International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict

RH Aritonang(1email), Aji Sujiwo(2), Tarsisius Susilo(3), Rapy Tadung(4), Andar Dodianto Panggabean(5)


(1) Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung, Indonesia
(2) Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung, Indonesia
(3) Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung, Indonesia
(4) Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung, Indonesia
(5) Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: This article analyzes the application of international humanitarian law (IHL) in the Russia–Ukraine conflict, focusing on the impact of hybrid warfare on civilian protection mechanisms.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the failure of civilian protection during the Russia–Ukraine conflict from legal, ethical, and strategic perspectives.

Methods of the Research: This research uses a qualitative normative method, employing case study and literature review approaches, supported by interviews with legal practitioners to explore gaps between IHL norms and military operations.

Results of the Research: The findings of this study show a critical disjunction between IHL provisions and military practices on the ground, leading to significant risks for non-combatants. The hybrid nature of the conflict complicates legal accountability and ethical compliance. This article offers a novel recommendation for reformulating combat strategies and updating military education curricula to better internalize IHL principles in contemporary armed conflicts.

Keywords


International Humanitarian Law; Civil Protection; Conflict; War Ethics.


DOI


10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096

Published


2025-11-03

How To Cite


APA: Aritonang, R., Sujiwo, A., Susilo, T., Tadung, R., & Panggabean, A.D. (2025). International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Balobe Law Journal, 5(2), 86-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096.
IEEE: R. Aritonang, A. Sujiwo, T. Susilo, R. Tadung, and A.D. Panggabean, "International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict", Balobe Law J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 86-94, Nov. 2025. Accessed on: Nov. 5, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096
Harvard: Aritonang, R., Sujiwo, A., Susilo, T., Tadung, R., and Panggabean, A.D., (2025). "International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict". Balobe Law Journal, Volume 5(2), pp. 86-94. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096 (Accessed on: 5 November 2025)
Chicago: Aritonang, RH, Aji Sujiwo, Tarsisius Susilo, Rapy Tadung, and Andar Dodianto Panggabean. "International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict." Balobe Law Journal 5, no. 2 (October 14, 2025): 86-94. Accessed November 5, 2025. doi:10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096
Vancouver: Aritonang R, Sujiwo A, Susilo T, Tadung R, Panggabean AD. International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Balobe Law J. [Internet]. 2025 Nov 3 [cited 2025 Nov 5];5(2):86-94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096
MLA 8th: Aritonang, RH, Aji Sujiwo, Tarsisius Susilo, Rapy Tadung, and Andar Dodianto Panggabean. "International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict." Balobe Law Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, 14 Oct. 2025, pp. 86-94, doi:10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096. Accessed 5 Nov. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{balobe3096,
		author = {RH Aritonang and Aji Sujiwo and Tarsisius Susilo and Rapy Tadung and Andar Panggabean},
		title = {International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict},
		journal = {Balobe Law Journal},
		volume = {5},
		number = {2},
		year = {2025},
		keywords = {International Humanitarian Law; Civil Protection; Conflict; War Ethics.},
		abstract = {Introduction: This article analyzes the application of international humanitarian law (IHL) in the Russia–Ukraine conflict, focusing on the impact of hybrid warfare on civilian protection mechanisms.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the failure of civilian protection during the Russia–Ukraine conflict from legal, ethical, and strategic perspectives.Methods of the Research: This research uses a qualitative normative method, employing case study and literature review approaches, supported by interviews with legal practitioners to explore gaps between IHL norms and military operations.Results of the Research: The findings of this study show a critical disjunction between IHL provisions and military practices on the ground, leading to significant risks for non-combatants. The hybrid nature of the conflict complicates legal accountability and ethical compliance. This article offers a novel recommendation for reformulating combat strategies and updating military education curricula to better internalize IHL principles in contemporary armed conflicts.},
				issn = {2775-6149},		pages = {86--94}			doi = {10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/3096}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Anthony Cullen, “The Role of International Humanitarian Law Education in Military Training: Challenges and Opportunities,” Journal of Conflict & Security Law 19, no. 3 (2014): 473–494.

Damara Nathania Boru Siahaan and Tjokorda Istri Diah Widyantari Pradnya Dewi, “Invasi Rusia ke Ukraina 2022 dalam Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional”, Jurnal Kertha Negara 11, no. 4 (2023).

Human Rights Watch, Russia: Apparent War Crimes in Ukraine, April 2022. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/04/03/russia-apparent-war-crimes-ukraine.

Human Rights Watch, Ukraine: Civilian Deaths in Russian Attacks May Be War Crimes, February 2022, tersedia di: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/02/25/ukraine-civilian-deaths-russian-attacks-may-be-war-crimes.

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), “International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts", Report 2022): 13–20.

ICRC, Guidelines on Integrating International Humanitarian Law into the Training of Armed Forces, Geneva: ICRC, 2019.

Jeff McMahan, “The Ethics of Killing in War,” Ethics, 114, no. 4 (2004): 693–733.

Jeff McMahan, Killing in War, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Jelena Pejic, “The Protective Scope of Common Article 3: Legal Policy and Operational Relevance,” International Review of the Red Cross, 93, no. 881 (2011): 189–212.

Marco Sassòli, International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.

Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, (New York: Basic Books, 2015.

Pujayanti, Adirini. “Posisi Rusia dan Perkembangan Krisis Ukraina.” Jurnal Info Singkat Hubungan Internasional 6, no. 13 (2014).

Wasis Susetio, Zulfikar, and Anatomi Muliawan, “Pelanggaran Hukum Internasional dalam Perang Rusia-Ukraina”, Lex Jurnalica 20, no. 1, (2023).

Rachel Manitik, “Protection of Civilian Populations in International Armed Conflict According to International Humanitarian Law”, Lex Privatum 11, no. 1 (2023).

Sandesh Sivakumaran, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Soerjono Sukanto and Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali, 2001.

Terry Gill and Dieter Fleck (eds.), The Handbook of International Law of Military Operations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Terry D. Gill, “Humanitarian Law in Military Academies: The European Model,” in the Terry Gill & Dieter Fleck (eds.), The Handbook of International Law of Military Operations, Oxford: OUP, 2010.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 44 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 26 times



 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document International Humanitarian Law at the Crossroads: A Strategic Reflection on the Failure of Civil Protection in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country RH Aritonang; Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Aji Sujiwo; Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Tarsisius Susilo; Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Rapy Tadung; Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Andar Dodianto Panggabean; Staff College of the Armed Forces, Bandung; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) International Humanitarian Law; Civil Protection; Conflict; War Ethics.
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: This article analyzes the application of international humanitarian law (IHL) in the Russia–Ukraine conflict, focusing on the impact of hybrid warfare on civilian protection mechanisms.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the failure of civilian protection during the Russia–Ukraine conflict from legal, ethical, and strategic perspectives.Methods of the Research: This research uses a qualitative normative method, employing case study and literature review approaches, supported by interviews with legal practitioners to explore gaps between IHL norms and military operations.Results of the Research: The findings of this study show a critical disjunction between IHL provisions and military practices on the ground, leading to significant risks for non-combatants. The hybrid nature of the conflict complicates legal accountability and ethical compliance. This article offers a novel recommendation for reformulating combat strategies and updating military education curricula to better internalize IHL principles in contemporary armed conflicts.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2025-11-03
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/3096
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/balobe.v5i2.3096
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Balobe Law Journal; Volume 5 Issue 2, October 2025
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files Hukum Humaniter Internasional di Persimpangan: Refleksi Strategis terhadap Kegagalan Perlindungan Sipil dalam Konflik Russia-Ukarina (104KB)
Untitled (104KB)
Hukum Humaniter Internasional di Persimpangan: Refleksi Strategis terhadap Kegagalan Perlindungan Sipil dalam Konflik Russia-Ukarina (104KB)
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

License: Balobe Law Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 RH Aritonang, Aji Sujiwo, Tarsisius Susilo, Rapy Tadung, Andar Dodianto Panggabean

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.