Kondisi dan Dampak Perbedaan Regulasi Penanganan Narkoba di Beberapa Negara ASEAN
)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introductioan: In this era of globalization, drug abuse and trafficking through smuggling in the Southeast Asian region is increasingly prevalent. Southeast Asia's strategic geographical location makes it an attractive traffic area for drug trafficking syndicates, both transnational and international. Therefore, there is a need for cooperation among ASEAN countries in dealing with this problem. Unfortunately, in terms of drug handling in ASEAN countries, there are still differences in regulations that have an impact on drug handling in the Southeast Asian region.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to find out how the conditions of differences in drug handling regulations in ASEAN countries and the resulting impacts.
Methods of the Research: This research uses normative juridical research methods and the problem approaches used are conceptual approaches, case approaches, and comparative approaches.
Novelty of the Research: Based on the results of the research that has been conducted, it is known that there are still differences in regulations between ASEAN countries. This difference can be seen through a comparison between the applicable laws in Indonesia and Malaysia regarding sanctions and the minimum amount of drug possession that can be punished by death. Then the difference in regulations in Thailand which began to legalize the use of marijuana in the health sector as well as in food and beverages. There is also a misalignment that can be seen through differences in the provision of death penalty sanctions. As a result, there is a gap in sanctions that can facilitate narcotics trafficking between countries due to lighter, weaker or less stringent drug handling regulations in one country with another.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/balobe.v4i1.1944
Published
2024-04-30
How To Cite
@article{balobe1944,
author = {Elsa Wear},
title = {Kondisi dan Dampak Perbedaan Regulasi Penanganan Narkoba di Beberapa Negara ASEAN},
journal = {Balobe Law Journal},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
year = {2024},
keywords = {ASEAN; Regulatory Differences; Drug.},
abstract = {Introductioan: In this era of globalization, drug abuse and trafficking through smuggling in the Southeast Asian region is increasingly prevalent. Southeast Asia's strategic geographical location makes it an attractive traffic area for drug trafficking syndicates, both transnational and international. Therefore, there is a need for cooperation among ASEAN countries in dealing with this problem. Unfortunately, in terms of drug handling in ASEAN countries, there are still differences in regulations that have an impact on drug handling in the Southeast Asian region.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to find out how the conditions of differences in drug handling regulations in ASEAN countries and the resulting impacts.Methods of the Research: This research uses normative juridical research methods and the problem approaches used are conceptual approaches, case approaches, and comparative approaches.Novelty of the Research: Based on the results of the research that has been conducted, it is known that there are still differences in regulations between ASEAN countries. This difference can be seen through a comparison between the applicable laws in Indonesia and Malaysia regarding sanctions and the minimum amount of drug possession that can be punished by death. Then the difference in regulations in Thailand which began to legalize the use of marijuana in the health sector as well as in food and beverages. There is also a misalignment that can be seen through differences in the provision of death penalty sanctions. As a result, there is a gap in sanctions that can facilitate narcotics trafficking between countries due to lighter, weaker or less stringent drug handling regulations in one country with another.},
issn = {2775-6149}, pages = {1--10} doi = {10.47268/balobe.v4i1.1944},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/1944}
}
Artikel Jurnal
Anggraini, Devi, Kebijakan ASEAN dalam Menanggulangi Penyalahgunaan Narkotika dan Obat-obatan Berbahaya di Asia Tenggara, Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional, Vol. 5 No. 3, Oktober 2016
Romdoni, Muhammad, dan Atu Karomah, Perbandingan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Terhadap Kejahaan Narkotika aau Dadah (Studi Komparati Indonesia dan Malaysia), Jurnal Al-Qisthas Vol. 1 No. 1, Januari-Juni 2021
Sianturi, Gabriel Mallatang dan Anak Agung Sri Utari, “Perang Terhadap Narkoba Serta Penarikan Diri Dari Pengadilan Pidana Internasional Oleh Filipina: Perspektif Hukum Internasional,” Kertha Negara 9, no. 3 (2021)
Buku
Devancey, Madona, Gary Reid, dan Simon Baldwin, Situational Analysis of Illicit Drug Issues and Responses in The Asia-Pasific Region, Camberra: Australian National Council on Drugs: 2006.
Prayuda, Rendi, dan Syafri Harto, Asean dan Kejahatan Transnasional Narkotika (Problematika, Dinamika dan Tantangan), Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak, 2020.
Skripsi, Tesis, Distertasi, Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain
ABC, Malaysia Mulai Perlakukan Pengguna Narkoba sebagai Kriminal, http://www.tempo.co/abc/4716/malaysia-mulai-perlakukan-pengguna-narkoba-bukan-sebagai-kriminal
AFP, Timor-Leste: Drug Policy Should Distinguish Cannabis from Dangerous Drughs-President, https://www.macaubusiness.com/timor-leste-drug-policy-should- distinguish-cannabis-from-dangerous-drugs-president/
Humas BNN, BNN RI Bahas Permasalahan Narkotika di Asean, htps://bnn.go.id/bnn-ri-bahas-permasalahan narkotika-asean/
Lewanmeru, Oby, Timor Leste Masih Pakai UU RI untuk Berantas Narkoba, https://kupang.tribunnews.com/2015/10/17/timor-leste-masih-pakai-uu-ri-untuk-berantas-narkoba
Pristiandaru, Danur Lambang, Perang Melawan Narkobadi Filipina Tak Akan Berhenti, tapi Caranya Berbeda, https://www.kompas.com/global/read/2022/09/25/130100870/ perang-melawan-narkoba-di-filipina-tak-akan-berhenti-tapi-caranya-berbeda#
Pssat UGM, Belajar tentang Perbedaan Hukuman Mati di Negara-Negara Asia Tenggara, htps://pssat.ugm.ac.id/id/belajar-tentang-perbedaan-hukuman-mai-di-negara-negara-asia-tenggara/
Putri, Vanya Karuni Mulia, Keuntungan Letak Geografis ASEAN, https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2022/05/04/103000469/keuntungan-letak-geografis-asean?page=all#page2
Rohman, Baitur, BNN Beberkan Jalur Penyelundupan Narkoba ke Indonesia, 80% Lewat Laut, https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/203264/bnn-beberkan-jalur-penyelundupan-narkoba-ke-indonesia-80-lewat-laut
Voa Indonesia, Thailand Legalkan Konsumsi Mariyuana pada Makanan dan Minuman, htps://www.voaindonesia.com/a/thailand-legalkan-konsumsi/mariyuana-pada-makanan-dan-minuman/6609749.html
: 575 times
Download : 1145 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Kondisi dan Dampak Perbedaan Regulasi Penanganan Narkoba di Beberapa Negara ASEAN |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Elsa Amalia Wear; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | ASEAN; Regulatory Differences; Drug. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introductioan: In this era of globalization, drug abuse and trafficking through smuggling in the Southeast Asian region is increasingly prevalent. Southeast Asia's strategic geographical location makes it an attractive traffic area for drug trafficking syndicates, both transnational and international. Therefore, there is a need for cooperation among ASEAN countries in dealing with this problem. Unfortunately, in terms of drug handling in ASEAN countries, there are still differences in regulations that have an impact on drug handling in the Southeast Asian region.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to find out how the conditions of differences in drug handling regulations in ASEAN countries and the resulting impacts.Methods of the Research: This research uses normative juridical research methods and the problem approaches used are conceptual approaches, case approaches, and comparative approaches.Novelty of the Research: Based on the results of the research that has been conducted, it is known that there are still differences in regulations between ASEAN countries. This difference can be seen through a comparison between the applicable laws in Indonesia and Malaysia regarding sanctions and the minimum amount of drug possession that can be punished by death. Then the difference in regulations in Thailand which began to legalize the use of marijuana in the health sector as well as in food and beverages. There is also a misalignment that can be seen through differences in the provision of death penalty sanctions. As a result, there is a gap in sanctions that can facilitate narcotics trafficking between countries due to lighter, weaker or less stringent drug handling regulations in one country with another. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2024-04-30 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/1944 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/balobe.v4i1.1944 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | Balobe Law Journal; Volume 4 Issue 1, April 2024 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | id |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: Balobe Law Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Elsa Amalia Wear
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
