Advokasi World Animal Protection Terhadap Permasalahan Kesejahteraan Beruang Melalui China’s Local Office Ditinjau Dari Hukum Organisasi Internasional
), Zulfikar Jayakusuma(2), Ledy Diana(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Transnationalism era, there has been a structured change in various dimension of International relations, include the actor which implies that the state is not the only capable one to influencing global developments. This shift strengthens INGO’s role as a part of international organization. Their advocacy plays an important role in bear welfare issues at China’s Bears Bile Industry.
Purposes of the Research: This article aims to review World Animal Protection’s competences as a jurisdiction personality through its advocacy agenda on Bears bile industry in China.
Methods of the Research: This article is written by utilizing normative legal research by focusing on synchronization of World Animal Protection’s advocacy effort and balances to Chinese administration also law through historical and descriptive methods.
Results of the Research: World Animal Protection’s advocacy has conformed to the general legal principles of environmental by utilizing the ethics of biocentralism, which entirely aimed to the mission of saving bears. However, the advocacy launched against China’s bear bile industry should be against international organization law based on the absence of permanent secretariat in China. This action may be due to the organization’s lack of compliance to naturalize its administration and laws in China. Therefore, the resulting effect tends to be puzzling because it doesn’t show a significant and measurable impact when compared to the other advocacy through similar issues.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/balobe.v4i1.1993
Published
2024-04-30
How To Cite
@article{balobe1993,
author = {Hadonia Manurung and Zulfikar Jayakusuma and Ledy Diana},
title = {Advokasi World Animal Protection Terhadap Permasalahan Kesejahteraan Beruang Melalui China’s Local Office Ditinjau Dari Hukum Organisasi Internasional},
journal = {Balobe Law Journal},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Animal Welfare Principle; International Organization Law; China’s Bears Bile.},
abstract = {Introduction: Transnationalism era, there has been a structured change in various dimension of International relations, include the actor which implies that the state is not the only capable one to influencing global developments. This shift strengthens INGO’s role as a part of international organization. Their advocacy plays an important role in bear welfare issues at China’s Bears Bile Industry.Purposes of the Research: This article aims to review World Animal Protection’s competences as a jurisdiction personality through its advocacy agenda on Bears bile industry in China.Methods of the Research: This article is written by utilizing normative legal research by focusing on synchronization of World Animal Protection’s advocacy effort and balances to Chinese administration also law through historical and descriptive methods.Results of the Research: World Animal Protection’s advocacy has conformed to the general legal principles of environmental by utilizing the ethics of biocentralism, which entirely aimed to the mission of saving bears. However, the advocacy launched against China’s bear bile industry should be against international organization law based on the absence of permanent secretariat in China. This action may be due to the organization’s lack of compliance to naturalize its administration and laws in China. Therefore, the resulting effect tends to be puzzling because it doesn’t show a significant and measurable impact when compared to the other advocacy through similar issues.},
issn = {2775-6149}, pages = {11--25} doi = {10.47268/balobe.v4i1.1993},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/1993}
}
Artikel Jurnal
Hinsley, Amy, Sifan Hu, Haochun Chen, David Garshelis, Michael Hoffmann, Tien Ming Lee, Brendan Moyle, Yingjie Qiu, Xiangdong Ruan, Anita Kar Yan Wan, Jiemin Zhou, dan E. J. Milner-Gulland, “Combining Data from Consumers and Traditional Medicine Practicioners to Provide more Complete of Chinese Bear Bile Markets,” British Ecologycal Society Journal Vol. 5, No. 2 (2021): h. 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10249.
Tamzil, Cazadira, “Consesting Global Civil Society’s Legitimacy Claims: Evaluating International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGO) Representation of and Accountability to Beneficiaries,” Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Universitas Indonesia Vol. 18, No. 2 (2017): h.10. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v18i2.304.
Dong, Chen, Meng Ming,Wu Bian-ying, Xu Wen-jie, Wu Su-huan, dan Liu Chun-ying, “Study of the Effect of Tan Re Qing Injection on Immune Function of the Mice Infected with Corona Virus Disease,” Journal of Hebei University (Natural Science Edition) Vol. 26, No. 5 (2020): h. 4. 10.7150/ijbs.45538.
Satmaidi, Edra, Konsep Deep Ecology dalam Pengaturan Hukum Lingkungan, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Supremasi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu Vol. 24, No. 2 (2015): h. 2. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.24.2.192-105.
David, Favre, “Integrating Animal Interest into Our Legal System”, MSU Legal Studies Research Paper Vol. 02, No. 10 (2004): h.3. https://ssrn.com/abstract=578570.
Miah, Gibson, “The Universal Declaration of Animal Welfare”, Journal Deakin Law Review Vol. 16, No. 2 (2011): h.21. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2011vol16no2art112.
Yustitianingtyas, Levina, Masyarakat dan Hukum Internasional: Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap
Perubahan-perubahan Sosial dalam Masyarakat Internasional, Jurnal Perspektif Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah Surabaya Vol. XX, No. II (2015): h. 90. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v20i2.150.
Natamihardja, Rudi, “Daya Ikat Framework Agreement terhadap Pihak Ketiga (Studi Kasus terhadap Nota Kesepakatan antara Indonesia dan Singapura mengenai Pengembangan Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus di Pulau Batam, Bintan, dan Karimun),” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Lampung Vol. 1, No. 1 (2007): h. 3. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v1no1.531.
Krasner, Stephen, “Abiding Sovereignty, International Political Science Review Vol. 22, No. 1 (2001): h.229. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251210122300.
Feng, Yibin, Kayu Siu, Ning Wang, Kwan-Ming Ng, Sai-Wah Tsao, Tadashi Nagamatsu, dan Yao Tong, “Bear Bile: Dilemma of Traditional Medicinal use and Animal Protection”, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine Vol. 5, No. 2 (2009): h. 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-2.
Buku
Broms, Bengt, The Doctrine of Equality of States as Applied in International Organizations. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press, 1959.
Tamzil, Cazadira, Advokasi World Society for the Protection of Animal untuk Isu Kesejahteraan Hewan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2018.
Schermers, Henry, International Institutional Law. Netherlands: Sijthoff anf Noordhoff International Publishers, 1980.
Chandler, Ian, Advocacy and Campaigning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Bhose, Joel, NGO’s and Rural Development: Theory and Practices. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company, 2003.
Foley, Kaitlyn, Pills, Powder, Vials, and Flakes. Selangor: TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, 2021.
Loeffler, Kati, Compromised Health and Welfare of Bears Farmed for Bile in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Levy, Marc, The Study of International Regimes. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied System Analysis, 1996.
Keck, Margareth, Activist Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
Arkheurst, Michael, Modern Introduction to International Law Third Edition. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1977.
Parthiana, Wayan, Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju, 2003.
Price, Richard, Moral, Limit, and Possibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Sefriani, Hukum Internasional Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.
Suwardi, Setianingsih, Hukum Perjanjian Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Vertovec, Steven, Transnationalism. Routledge: Oxon, 2009.
Regan, Tom, The Case for Animal Rights. Barkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
Skripsi, Tesis, Distertasi, Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain
World Animal Protection, “Unbearable: The International Bear Bile Trade,” 2017, https://www.worldanimalprotection.us/sites/default/files/media/us_files/unbearable-the-international-bear-bile-trade-sept-2018.pdf.
: 760 times
Download : 161 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Advokasi World Animal Protection Terhadap Permasalahan Kesejahteraan Beruang Melalui China’s Local Office Ditinjau Dari Hukum Organisasi Internasional |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Hadonia Lazarus Manurung; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Zulfikar Jayakusuma; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Ledy Diana; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Animal Welfare Principle; International Organization Law; China’s Bears Bile. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Transnationalism era, there has been a structured change in various dimension of International relations, include the actor which implies that the state is not the only capable one to influencing global developments. This shift strengthens INGO’s role as a part of international organization. Their advocacy plays an important role in bear welfare issues at China’s Bears Bile Industry.Purposes of the Research: This article aims to review World Animal Protection’s competences as a jurisdiction personality through its advocacy agenda on Bears bile industry in China.Methods of the Research: This article is written by utilizing normative legal research by focusing on synchronization of World Animal Protection’s advocacy effort and balances to Chinese administration also law through historical and descriptive methods.Results of the Research: World Animal Protection’s advocacy has conformed to the general legal principles of environmental by utilizing the ethics of biocentralism, which entirely aimed to the mission of saving bears. However, the advocacy launched against China’s bear bile industry should be against international organization law based on the absence of permanent secretariat in China. This action may be due to the organization’s lack of compliance to naturalize its administration and laws in China. Therefore, the resulting effect tends to be puzzling because it doesn’t show a significant and measurable impact when compared to the other advocacy through similar issues. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2024-04-30 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/1993 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/balobe.v4i1.1993 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | Balobe Law Journal; Volume 4 Issue 1, April 2024 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | Ina |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: Balobe Law Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Hadonia Lazarus Manurung, Zulfikar Jayakusuma, Ledy Diana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
