Foreign Arbitration As The Only Recourse In Resolving Trademark Disputes In A Civil Manner, Criticism of Act Number 20 Year 2016 About Brands and Geographical Indications

Theresia Nolda Agnes Narwadan(1email)


(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Act Number 20 year 2016 on trademark and geographic indication opens up opportunities to resolve trademark disputes not only through the Commercial Court, but also to resolve disputes through the District Court.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of the study was to find a form of fair trademark dispute resolution. Conventionally, dispute resolution is usually done by litigation or dispute resolution before the court.

Methods of the Research: Normative research is used to answer the formulation of problems regarding foreign arbitration as the only way to resolve trademark rights disputes in a civil manner. The method of approach is the approach of legislation that is to examine and analyze the regulation.

Results of the Research: Indonesia also has repeatedly updated the regulation on trademark, but on the other hand, the level of trademark infringement is increasing, even the Commercial Court which should be a place for people to seek justice often gives decisions that do not reflect justice. Is it not better to start looking for other alternatives to resolve trademark disputes that can provide a sense of justice to the community. The court, which is only a mouthpiece of the acts, without regard to the conventions in the field of trademark that have actually been ratified by Indonesia, making the enforcement of trademark regulations in Indonesia, has not been able to provide a sense of justice to holders of rights to trademarks, especially holders of rights to well-known trademars. So that the settlement of famous brand disputes through foreign arbitration is expected to provide a sense of justice for the rights holders of the wellknown trademark.

Keywords


Foreign Arbitration; Dispute Resolution; Brand


DOI


10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2404

Published


2024-10-31

How To Cite


APA: Narwadan, T.N. (2024). Foreign Arbitration As The Only Recourse In Resolving Trademark Disputes In A Civil Manner, Criticism of Act Number 20 Year 2016 About Brands and Geographical Indications. Balobe Law Journal, 4(2), 119 - 128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2404.
IEEE: T.N. Narwadan, "Foreign Arbitration As The Only Recourse In Resolving Trademark Disputes In A Civil Manner, Criticism of Act Number 20 Year 2016 About Brands and Geographical Indications", Balobe Law J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 119 - 128, Oct. 2024. Accessed on: Nov. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2404
Harvard: Narwadan, T.N., (2024). "Foreign Arbitration As The Only Recourse In Resolving Trademark Disputes In A Civil Manner, Criticism of Act Number 20 Year 2016 About Brands and Geographical Indications". Balobe Law Journal, Volume 4(2), pp. 119 - 128. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2404 (Accessed on: 15 November 2024)
Chicago: Narwadan, Theresia Nolda Agnes. "Foreign Arbitration As The Only Recourse In Resolving Trademark Disputes In A Civil Manner, Criticism of Act Number 20 Year 2016 About Brands and Geographical Indications." Balobe Law Journal 4, no. 2 (October 31, 2024): 119 - 128. Accessed November 15, 2024. doi:10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2404
Vancouver: Narwadan TN. Foreign Arbitration As The Only Recourse In Resolving Trademark Disputes In A Civil Manner, Criticism of Act Number 20 Year 2016 About Brands and Geographical Indications. Balobe Law J. [Internet]. 2024 Oct 31 [cited 2024 Nov 15];4(2):119 - 128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2404
MLA 8th: Narwadan, Theresia Nolda Agnes. "Foreign Arbitration As The Only Recourse In Resolving Trademark Disputes In A Civil Manner, Criticism of Act Number 20 Year 2016 About Brands and Geographical Indications." Balobe Law Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, 31 Oct. 2024, pp. 119 - 128, doi:10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2404. Accessed 15 Nov. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{balobe2404,
		author = {Theresia Narwadan},
		title = {Foreign Arbitration As The Only Recourse In Resolving Trademark Disputes In A Civil Manner, Criticism of Act Number 20 Year 2016 About Brands and Geographical Indications},
		journal = {Balobe Law Journal},
		volume = {4},
		number = {2},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Foreign Arbitration; Dispute Resolution; Brand},
		abstract = {Introduction: Act Number 20 year 2016 on trademark and geographic indication opens up opportunities to resolve trademark disputes not only through the Commercial Court, but also to resolve disputes through the District Court.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of the study was to find a form of fair trademark dispute resolution. Conventionally, dispute resolution is usually done by litigation or dispute resolution before the court.Methods of the Research: Normative research is used to answer the formulation of problems regarding foreign arbitration as the only way to resolve trademark rights disputes in a civil manner. The method of approach is the approach of legislation that is to examine and analyze the regulation.Results of the Research: Indonesia also has repeatedly updated the regulation on trademark, but on the other hand, the level of trademark infringement is increasing, even the Commercial Court which should be a place for people to seek justice often gives decisions that do not reflect justice. Is it not better to start looking for other alternatives to resolve trademark disputes that can provide a sense of justice to the community. The court, which is only a mouthpiece of the acts, without regard to the conventions in the field of trademark that have actually been ratified by Indonesia, making the enforcement of trademark regulations in Indonesia, has not been able to provide a sense of justice to holders of rights to trademarks, especially holders of rights to well-known trademars. So that the settlement of famous brand disputes through foreign arbitration is expected to provide a sense of justice for the rights holders of the wellknown trademark.},
				issn = {2775-6149},		pages = {119--128}			doi = {10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2404},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/2404}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Journal Article

Anik Entriani. Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal An-Nisbah Vol 03 No 02 April 2017. p. 8-20. https://doi.org/15.25101/annisbah.v03no02.6808.

Agil Febriansyah Santoso, Implementasi Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum, Jurnal Notarius, Vol 15 Nomor 2. 2022.

Devirianti Effendi. Pelaksanaan Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat Tidak Mampu Di Luar Pengadilan (Non Litigasi). Jurnal Unes Vol I Issue I 2017. p 55-66. https://doi.org/15.25101/unnes.v01no01.6578.

Dian Latifani, Pentingnya Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Hak Benda Bagi Hak Cipta Atau Merek Perusahaan, Supermasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, Vol 32 No 1, 2022.

Harijanto. Analisa Terhadap Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) Ditinjau Dari Sosiologi Hukum. Jurnal Rechtens Vol 3 No2 Desember 2014 p 8-20. https://doi.org/18.15101/rechtens.v03no02.6808.

Indriati Amarini. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif Dan Efisien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi Di Pengadilan”. Jurnal Kosmik Hukum Vol 16 No 2 Juni (2016): 88-98. https://doi.org/16.88198/kosmik.v16n2.1017.

Karlina Perdana & Pujiyanto. Kelemahan Undang-undang Merek Dalam Hal Pendaftaran Merek (Studi Atas Putusan Sengketa Merek Pierre Cardin). Privat Law Vol V No 2 Juli-Desember 2017. p 45-67. https://doi.org/15.25101/privatlaw.v05no02.6678.

Lahmuddin Zuhri & Endra Syaifuddin. Nilai Lokal Sebagai Model Mediasi Perdata Di Indonesia. E-Journal Graduate Unpar Part B:Legal Science. Vol 3 No 1 Tahun 2017. 77-90. https://doi.org/15.25101/ejournal.v03no01.6678.

Maya Jannah, Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, Vol 06 No 02, 2018.

Rahmi Yuniarti. Efisiensi Pemilihan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waralaba. Jurnal Fiat Justitia Vol 10 Issue 3 Juli-September 2016. p 35-50. https://doi.org/15.25101/fiatjustitia.v10no31.6808.

Renaldi, Ivan. “Optimalisasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Bidang Desain Industri (Studi Industri Mebel Dan Kerajinan Kabupaten Jepara)”. Privat Law Vol 6 No 1 (2018). P 50-64. https://doi.org/15.25101/privatlaw.v06no01.6678.

Vero Arifani Caniago, Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Solusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pengadilan, Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, No 8 Vol 3 doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7242951.

Book

Endang Purwaningsing, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Investasi: Kajian HKI Dalam Dunia Investasi Termasuk Pada UKMK, Setara Press, Malang, 2019.

Rahmadi Usman, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta Barat, 2020.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 80 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 54 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Theresia Nolda Agnes Narwadan

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0