Legal Challenges in Marine Governance in the North Natuna Marine Dispute Area

Authors

  • Philippa Philomena Kosho Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
  • Esterlita Nova Yaser Rantung Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v6i1.3171

Keywords:

North Natuna Sea, Exclusive Economic Zone, Nine-Dash Line, UNCLOS 1982, Maritime Dispute

Abstract

Introduction: The North Natuna Sea is rich in natural resources but remains a disputed area due to China’s nine-dash line claim, which overlaps with Indonesia’s EEZ under UNCLOS 1982.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze Indonesia’s legal position and dispute resolution strategies in the North Natuna Sea.

Methods of the Research: This research uses a normative juridical method by analyzing international legal instruments and national regulations related to EEZ and the law of the sea.

Results of the Research: The findings show that Indonesia has a strong legal standing over its EEZ in the North Natuna Sea based on UNCLOS 1982. However, enforcement faces challenges such as unilateral claims, illegal foreign vessel activities, limited surveillance capacity, and weak dispute resolution mechanisms. A comprehensive strategy combining legal action, diplomacy, and strengthened economic presence is needed to uphold sovereignty and sustainably manage marine resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Anatasia Anjani, “10 Negara Kepulauan Terbesar Di Dunia, Salah Satunya Indonesia", ‘10 Negara Kepulauan Terbesar Di Dunia, Salah Satunya Indonesia,’” detikEdu, https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-5679064/10-negara-kepulauan-terbesar-di-dunia-salah-satunya-indonesia.

Berlinda Nefertiti Goldy Salaki, “Klaim Nine-dash Line China: Pendekatan Pertahanan Indonesia”, Skripsi, Bandung, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, 2018.

Boy Anugerah, “Penguatan Strategi Penangkalan Dalam Merespons Aksi Koersif Cina di Laut Natuna Utara,” Jurnal Dinamika Global 6, no. 2 (2021): 286–307, https://doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v6i2.701.

Chairul Anwar, Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Di Dalam Hukum International: Dilengkapi Dengan Analisis Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia dan ZEE di Asia-Pasifik, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1995.

“Diplomasi Dan Kedaulatan Di Laut China Selatan - ANTARA News,” accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4471313/diplomasi-dan-kedaulatan-di-laut-china-selatan?page=all.

Faisal Ahmad, “Diplomasi Indonesia Dengan Tiongkok Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut Natuna Utara,” 2022.

Febriyansyah Rahmat Maulana and Rahayu Repindowaty, “Analisis Putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration Terhadap Klaim Nine Dash Line: Studi Kasus Klaim Wilayah Natuna Utara,” Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law (Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Jambi University, 2021), https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v1i2.10452.

Jessica Johanna Chirsty and Anto Ismu Budianto, “Sengketa Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Dengan Vietnam Di Wilayah Laut Natuna Utara,” Reformasi Hukum Trisakti 4, no. 1 (2022): 201–10, https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v4i1.13428.

Juliet N A Ahmad, “Pengaturan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Di Laut Natuna Utara Menurut Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982”, Skripsi, Ambon, Indonesia, Universitas Pattimura, n.d.

Kenya Njenga, “Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee Report of the 13th.” Session at Lagos, January 1972.

Maulana and Repindowaty, “Analisis Putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration Terhadap Klaim Nine Dash Line: Studi Kasus Klaim Wilayah Natuna Utara.”

Muhar Junef, “Sengketa Wilayah Maritim di Laut Tiongkok Selatan,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 2 (June 26, 2018): 219, https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.219-240.

Novianto, Firmansyah, and Pratama, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Laut Natuna Utara.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 3, no. 1 (2020).

Nuans Asa Septari B et al., “Respon Indonesia Menghadapi Ancaman Cina Di Laut Natuna Utara di Masa Kepemimpinan Presiden Joko Widodo,” Jurnal Lemhannas RI (Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia, 2022), https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v10i1.267.

Oktriyanto Maatiri, Djoly A Sualang, and Thor Bangsaradja Sinaga, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Laut Natuna Antara Indonesia Dan Cina,” Lex Administratum 12, no. 5 (2023).

Raden Florentinus Bagus Adhi Pradana, “Akibat Hukum Klaim Nine Dash Line Cina Terhadap Hak Berdaulat Indonesia Di Perairan Kepulauan Natuna (Khususnya Kabupaten Natuna) Menurut UNCLOS 1982,” Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta,.

Ririn Ardila and Akbar Kurnia Putra, “Sengketa Wilayah Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia (Studi Kasus Klaim Cina Atas Laut Natuna Utara),” Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law 1, no. 3 (2021): 358–77, https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v1i3.10895.

Rizal Dwi Novianto, Dimas Agung Firmansyah, and Naufal Adi Pratama, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Laut Natuna Utara,” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 3, no. 1 (2020): 69-78.

“Sembilan Garis Putus Tiongkok - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia,” https://law.ui.ac.id/sembilan-garis-putus-tiongkok/.

S. Wahyuni, “Strategi Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Klaim Traditional Fishing Ground Pada Zona Ekonomi Ekslusif Indonesia Di Perairan Natuna Oleh …,” Sosioreligius: Jurnal Ilmiah …, 2019, https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Sosioreligius/article/view/13321.

Salira Niti Sara et al., “Perspekif Hukum Intenasional Dalam Sengketa Laut Natuna: Kasus Indonesia Dan China,” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 9, no. 17 (2023): 584–91, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8320611.

Sannet Febriyanti, "Penegakan Hukum Di Undelimited Area Yang Berbatasan Dengan Vietnam Guna Mempertahankan Hak Berdaulat Di ZEEI." Jurnal Maritim Indonesia (Indonesian Maritime Journal) 8, no. 2 (2020).

Yayat Ruyat, “Peran Indonesia Dalam Menjaga Wilayah Laut Natuna Dan Menyelesaikan Konflik Laut Tiongkok Selatan,” Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, Edisi 29, March 2017, 67–75.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Legal Challenges in Marine Governance in the North Natuna Marine Dispute Area. (2026). Balobe Law Journal, 6(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v6i1.3171

Most read articles by the same author(s)