Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida
)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introductioan: A case of international dispute between Gambia and Myanmar where both countries have ratified the Convention on The Prevention of The Crime of Genocide.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of the research is to identify the legal standing of the parties, analyze the judges’ interpretation of the dispute, and propose potential approaches to resolve this case.
Methods of the Research: This research uses a qualitative approach to understand the issue under study, with legal analysis methods to evaluate legal aspects and case studies of Gambia vs. Myanmar.
Results of the Research: Legal standing is important. With recognition as a legal subject and participation in international agreements. Then it can claim rights and demand obligations based on international law. In this paper, there are three relevant approaches that judges can use in resolving such dispute, namely geographical, political and humanitarian approaches. When the three are combined, it will enrich the legal analysis and possibly find the best solution for all international communities.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388
Published
2024-10-31
How To Cite
@article{balobe2388,
author = {Aulya Nisa’ and Nirwana Nirwana and Philippa Kosho},
title = {Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida},
journal = {Balobe Law Journal},
volume = {4},
number = {2},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Genocide; Convention Violations; Gambia; Myanmar},
abstract = {Introductioan: A case of international dispute between Gambia and Myanmar where both countries have ratified the Convention on The Prevention of The Crime of Genocide.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of the research is to identify the legal standing of the parties, analyze the judges’ interpretation of the dispute, and propose potential approaches to resolve this case.Methods of the Research: This research uses a qualitative approach to understand the issue under study, with legal analysis methods to evaluate legal aspects and case studies of Gambia vs. Myanmar.Results of the Research: Legal standing is important. With recognition as a legal subject and participation in international agreements. Then it can claim rights and demand obligations based on international law. In this paper, there are three relevant approaches that judges can use in resolving such dispute, namely geographical, political and humanitarian approaches. When the three are combined, it will enrich the legal analysis and possibly find the best solution for all international communities.},
issn = {2775-6149}, pages = {99--107} doi = {10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/2388}
}
Artikel Jurnal
Elda Maisya R & Rahmiati, “Kejahatan Genosida dalam Kasus Rohingnya Myanmar Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional”, Journal of Law and Government Science, Vol.8, No.1, April 2022, Banten, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia.
Michael Frederijk Tampubolon et al, “Penerapan Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide dalam Sengketa antara Gambia dan Myanmar”, Diponegoro Law Journal Vol.11 No.2, 2022.
Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo, “Kejahatan Genosida Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional”, Jurnal Gema, Vol.7, Edisi III, (2020), FH Undip.
Buku
Setianingsih Suwardi, Ida Kurnia. Hukum Perjanian Internasional, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain
Alex, J. (2023). Geopolitics and Genocide: the Gambia vs. Myanmar at The International Court of Justice. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 4, no 8, h. 1610, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/23996544231188822.
International Court of Justice, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the Gambia v. Myanmar): Application Instituting Proceedings and Request for Provisional Measures, ICJ, 2019, paragraf 130. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/178/178-20191111-APP-01-00-EN.pdf.
International Court of Justice, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the Gambia v. Myanmar): Judgement on preliminary objection, ICJ, 2022, paragraf 34. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/178/178-20220722-jud-01-00-en.pdf
Sigar Aji Poerana, S.H., “Peran Perjanjian Internasional dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa”, hukumonline.com, 2020, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/peran-perjanjian-internasional-dalam-menyelesaikan-sengketa-internasional-lt565bb6c3736c7/.
United Nations Treaty Collection, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-1&chapter=4&clang=_en#2.
United Nations, ICJ The Gambia v. Myanmar, https://iimm-un-org.translate.goog/icj-the-gambia-v-myanmar/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc
: 34 times
Download : 46 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aulya Nisa’, Nirwana, Philippa Philomena Kosho
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
