Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida

Aulya Nisa’(1), Nirwana Nirwana(2), Philippa Philomena Kosho(3email)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introductioan: A case of international dispute between Gambia and Myanmar where both countries have ratified the Convention on The Prevention of The Crime of Genocide.

Purposes of the Research:  The purpose of the research is to identify the legal standing of the parties, analyze the judges’ interpretation of the dispute, and propose potential approaches to resolve this case.

Methods of the Research: This research uses a qualitative approach to understand the issue under study, with legal analysis methods to evaluate legal aspects and case studies of Gambia vs. Myanmar.

Results of the Research: Legal standing is important. With recognition as a legal subject and participation in international agreements. Then it can claim rights and demand obligations based on international law. In this paper, there are three relevant approaches that judges can use in resolving such dispute, namely geographical, political and humanitarian approaches. When the three are combined, it will enrich the legal analysis and possibly find the best solution for all international communities.

Keywords


Genocide; Convention Violations; Gambia; Myanmar


DOI


10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388

Published


2024-10-31

How To Cite


APA: Nisa’, A., Nirwana, N., & Kosho, P.P. (2024). Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida. Balobe Law Journal, 4(2), 99 - 107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388.
IEEE: A. Nisa’, N. Nirwana, and P.P. Kosho, "Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida", Balobe Law J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 99 - 107, Oct. 2024. Accessed on: Jul. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388
Harvard: Nisa’, A., Nirwana, N., and Kosho, P.P., (2024). "Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida". Balobe Law Journal, Volume 4(2), pp. 99 - 107. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388 (Accessed on: 19 July 2025)
Chicago: Nisa’, Aulya, Nirwana Nirwana, and Philippa Philomena Kosho. "Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida." Balobe Law Journal 4, no. 2 (October 31, 2024): 99 - 107. Accessed July 19, 2025. doi:10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388
Vancouver: Nisa’ A, Nirwana N, Kosho PP. Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida. Balobe Law J. [Internet]. 2024 Oct 31 [cited 2025 Jul 19];4(2):99 - 107. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388
MLA 8th: Nisa’, Aulya, Nirwana Nirwana, and Philippa Philomena Kosho. "Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida." Balobe Law Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, 31 Oct. 2024, pp. 99 - 107, doi:10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388. Accessed 19 Jul. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{balobe2388,
		author = {Aulya Nisa’ and Nirwana Nirwana and Philippa Kosho},
		title = {Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa  Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida},
		journal = {Balobe Law Journal},
		volume = {4},
		number = {2},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Genocide; Convention Violations; Gambia; Myanmar},
		abstract = {Introductioan: A case of international dispute between Gambia and Myanmar where both countries have ratified the Convention on The Prevention of The Crime of Genocide.Purposes of the Research:  The purpose of the research is to identify the legal standing of the parties, analyze the judges’ interpretation of the dispute, and propose potential approaches to resolve this case.Methods of the Research: This research uses a qualitative approach to understand the issue under study, with legal analysis methods to evaluate legal aspects and case studies of Gambia vs. Myanmar.Results of the Research: Legal standing is important. With recognition as a legal subject and participation in international agreements. Then it can claim rights and demand obligations based on international law. In this paper, there are three relevant approaches that judges can use in resolving such dispute, namely geographical, political and humanitarian approaches. When the three are combined, it will enrich the legal analysis and possibly find the best solution for all international communities.},
				issn = {2775-6149},		pages = {99--107}			doi = {10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/2388}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Artikel Jurnal

Elda Maisya R & Rahmiati, “Kejahatan Genosida dalam Kasus Rohingnya Myanmar Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional”, Journal of Law and Government Science, Vol.8, No.1, April 2022, Banten, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia.

Michael Frederijk Tampubolon et al, “Penerapan Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide dalam Sengketa antara Gambia dan Myanmar”, Diponegoro Law Journal Vol.11 No.2, 2022.

Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo, “Kejahatan Genosida Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional”, Jurnal Gema, Vol.7, Edisi III, (2020), FH Undip.

Buku

Setianingsih Suwardi, Ida Kurnia. Hukum Perjanian Internasional, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain

Alex, J. (2023). Geopolitics and Genocide: the Gambia vs. Myanmar at The International Court of Justice. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 4, no 8, h. 1610, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/23996544231188822.

International Court of Justice, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the Gambia v. Myanmar): Application Instituting Proceedings and Request for Provisional Measures, ICJ, 2019, paragraf 130. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/178/178-20191111-APP-01-00-EN.pdf.

International Court of Justice, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the Gambia v. Myanmar): Judgement on preliminary objection, ICJ, 2022, paragraf 34. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/178/178-20220722-jud-01-00-en.pdf

Sigar Aji Poerana, S.H., “Peran Perjanjian Internasional dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa”, hukumonline.com, 2020, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/peran-perjanjian-internasional-dalam-menyelesaikan-sengketa-internasional-lt565bb6c3736c7/.

United Nations Treaty Collection, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-1&chapter=4&clang=_en#2.

United Nations, ICJ The Gambia v. Myanmar, https://iimm-un-org.translate.goog/icj-the-gambia-v-myanmar/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 1554 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 1348 times



 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Interpretasi Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pelanggaran Myanmar terhadap Konvensi Genosida
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Aulya Nisa’; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Nirwana Nirwana; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Philippa Philomena Kosho; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Genocide; Convention Violations; Gambia; Myanmar
 
4. Description Abstract Introductioan: A case of international dispute between Gambia and Myanmar where both countries have ratified the Convention on The Prevention of The Crime of Genocide.Purposes of the Research:  The purpose of the research is to identify the legal standing of the parties, analyze the judges’ interpretation of the dispute, and propose potential approaches to resolve this case.Methods of the Research: This research uses a qualitative approach to understand the issue under study, with legal analysis methods to evaluate legal aspects and case studies of Gambia vs. Myanmar.Results of the Research: Legal standing is important. With recognition as a legal subject and participation in international agreements. Then it can claim rights and demand obligations based on international law. In this paper, there are three relevant approaches that judges can use in resolving such dispute, namely geographical, political and humanitarian approaches. When the three are combined, it will enrich the legal analysis and possibly find the best solution for all international communities.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2024-10-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/balobe/article/view/2388
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/balobe.v4i2.2388
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Balobe Law Journal; Volume 4 Issue 2, October 2024
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

License: Balobe Law Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Aulya Nisa’, Nirwana, Philippa Philomena Kosho

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0