The Principles Of Liability On Telemedicine Practices

Arman Anwar(1email)


(1) Faculty of Law, Pattimura University
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


This research was aimed at analyzing and finding the principle of liability in telemedicine medical practice proportionally.This research is a legal research with the approach of statute approach, conceptual approach and comparative approach, as well as the approach to the case approach. According to Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 5 (1) of Act No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Authority, determine that the judge shall explore, and understand the legal values and sense of justice in society. Thus Article 1367 paragraph (3) BW and Article 46 of Act No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals in the application must be in the context of the intended. The principle of liability risk in medical practice telemedicine in proportion refers to professional liability among medical practitioners telemedicine. The theoretical legitimacy is based on professional relationships in the delegation of medical action based on the code of ethics, professional standards, and service standards, and standard operating procedures. Consequences on liability does not necessarily have to be based on errors primary physician (primary care physician / PCP) or primary nurse as subordinate as mean vicarious liability doctrine. Nomenclature "proportional" in a significant liability risk as the distribution of rights and obligations of professionals in proportion to each party's fault based on the values of equality (equitability), feasibility and appropriateness (fair and reasionableness). Accountability based on the viewpoint of interactive justice according to the values of professional skill, prudence or accuracy, responsibility, and colleague and the desire to do good for the sake of healing patients (doing good).

Keywords


Liability; Medical Practice; Telemedicine

How To Cite


APA: Anwar, A. (2016). The Principles Of Liability On Telemedicine Practices. Pattimura Law Journal, 1(1), 13 - 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i1.6.
IEEE: A. Anwar, "The Principles Of Liability On Telemedicine Practices", Pattimura Law J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13 - 37, Sep. 2016. Accessed on: May. 7, 2021. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i1.6
Harvard: Anwar, A., (2016). "The Principles Of Liability On Telemedicine Practices". Pattimura Law Journal, Volume 1(1), pp. 13 - 37. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i1.6 (Accessed on: 7 May 2021)
Chicago: Anwar, Arman. "The Principles Of Liability On Telemedicine Practices." Pattimura Law Journal 1, no. 1 (November 11, 2016): 13 - 37. Accessed May 7, 2021. doi:10.47268/palau.v1i1.6
Vancouver: Anwar A. The Principles Of Liability On Telemedicine Practices. Pattimura Law J. [Internet]. 2016 Sep 1 [cited 2021 May 7];1(1):13 - 37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i1.6
MLA 8th: Anwar, Arman. "The Principles Of Liability On Telemedicine Practices." Pattimura Law Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, 11 Nov. 2016, pp. 13 - 37, doi:10.47268/palau.v1i1.6. Accessed 7 May. 2021.
BibTeX:
@article{PALAU6,
		author = {Arman Anwar},
		title = {The Principles Of Liability On Telemedicine Practices},
		journal = {Pattimura Law Journal},
		volume = {1},
		number = {1},
		year = {2016},
		keywords = {Liability; Medical Practice; Telemedicine},
		abstract = {This research was aimed at analyzing and finding the principle of liability in telemedicine medical practice proportionally.This research is a legal research with the approach of statute approach, conceptual approach and comparative approach, as well as the approach to the case approach. According to Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 5 (1) of Act No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Authority, determine that the judge shall explore, and understand the legal values and sense of justice in society. Thus Article 1367 paragraph (3) BW and Article 46 of Act No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals in the application must be in the context of the intended. The principle of liability risk in medical practice telemedicine in proportion refers to professional liability among medical practitioners telemedicine. The theoretical legitimacy is based on professional relationships in the delegation of medical action based on the code of ethics, professional standards, and service standards, and standard operating procedures. Consequences on liability does not necessarily have to be based on errors primary physician (primary care physician / PCP) or primary nurse as subordinate as mean vicarious liability doctrine. Nomenclature "proportional" in a significant liability risk as the distribution of rights and obligations of professionals in proportion to each party's fault based on the values of equality (equitability), feasibility and appropriateness (fair and reasionableness). Accountability based on the viewpoint of interactive justice according to the values of professional skill, prudence or accuracy, responsibility, and colleague and the desire to do good for the sake of healing patients (doing good).},
				issn = {2527-7316},		pages = {13--37}			doi = {10.47268/palau.v1i1.6},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/palau/article/view/6}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 


Achmad Ali. (2002). Keterpurukan Hukum di Indonesia (Penyebab dan Solusi). Bandung: Cipta Karya.

Agus Purwadianto. "Praktisi Medis Siap Bersaing dalam Masyarakat ASEAN. Majalah Masyarakat ASEAN, Media Publikasi Direktorat Kerja Sama ASEAN Kementerian Luar Negeri, Edisi 6, December 2014.

Agus Yudha Hernoko. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsional dalam Kontrak Komersil. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Amanda Pinto and Martin Evans. (2003). Corporate Criminal Liability. London: Sweet & Maxweel.

Ann Helm, (2006). Malpraktik Keperawatan. Jakarta: Buku kedokteran AGC.

Craig J, Patterson V. (2005). "Introduction to the Practice of Telemedicine". Journal Telemedicine and Telecare, 11(1): 3 - 9.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X0501100102

Danrivanto Budhijanto. (2010). Hukum Telekomunikasi Penyiaran dan Teknologi Informasi Regulasi dan Konvergen. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Djasadin Saragih. (1985). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan. Surabaya: Airlangga University.

Elias Mossialos, Sarah Thomson and Annemarie Ter Linden. (2004). "Information Technology Law and Health Systems in the European Union," International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 20 (4): 498-508.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462304001424

Frederic Cunningham."Respondeat Superior In Admiralty". (1905-06) 19 Harv. L. Rev. 445 at 445
https://doi.org/10.2307/1322691

Gary T. Schwartz. (1996). "The Hidden and Fundamental Issue of Employer Vicarious Liability". 69 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1739 at 1745

Yusuf Shopie. (2011). Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi Dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Muhammad Yusuf. (2014). Eksistensi Kejaksaan Sebagai Pengacara. Dissertation. not published. Malang: Brawijaya University.

Marcia M. Boumil and Paula A. Hattis. (2011). Medical Liability, West Publishing, St Paul United Of America,.

O.W. Holmes, "Agency" (1890-91) 4 Harv. L. Rev. 345; (1891-92) 5 Harv. L. Rev. 1 at 14

Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur. Rencana Strategis (Renstra) Rumah Sakit Dr. Soetomo Tahun 2009-2014.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2003). Batas-batas Kebebasan Berkontrak. Jurnal Yuridika, 18(3): 193-194.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2010). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi 6. Jakarta: Kencana Pernadia Media Grup.

Peter van Bossche dkk. (2010). Pengantar Hukum WTO (Word Trade Organization). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

R. K. Gorea. (2005). "Legal Aspects of Telemedicine: Telemedical Jurisprudence". Journal of Punjab Academy of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 5: 3

R. Wirjono Prodjodikoro. (1988). Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Bale Bandung.

Edmon Makarim, (2010). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Roscoe Pound. (1965). The Task of Law, Translate by Muhammad Radjab, Jakarta: Bharata.

Satjipto Rahardjo. (1986). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.

Satjipto Rahardjo. (1997). Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia dalam Konteks Situasi Global, Jurnal Perspektif, 2 (2): 2
https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v2i2.153

Terry Hutchinson, (2002). Researching and Writing in Law. Sydney: Law book. Co. Pyrmont-NSW.

Henry Campbell. (1990). Black's Law Dictionary. Minnesotta: West Publishing co, St Paul.

Website:

Paula Giliker, Vicarious Liability in Tort: A Comparative Perspective, Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law (No. 69), Cambridge University Press, see www.cambridge.org. Access on 23 October 2014.

Telemedicine and e-Health Development, in www.telemed.org.ua. access on 23 August 2013

Telemedicine apakah dapat diterapkan di Indonesia, be in http://khalidmustafa.info. Access on 12 February 2011

J.W. Neyers, "A Theory Of Vicarious Liability" in www.ucc.ie/law. Access on 21-10 2013

David Storey D. The Closer View About Law Issues In Telemedicine. http://www.hhnmag.com/hhnmag/jsp/articledisplay.jsp? dcrpath= HHNMO. Access on 12 July 2012

Newspaper :

Arief B. Witarto. (2005). Kebebasan dan Etika Ilmu Pengetahuan. Harian Bisnis Indonesia. (21 Oktober 2005).

Bayi Tertukar Ganti Rugi Rp 27 Miliar. (2015). Harian Jawa Pos, (11 February 2015).

Prija Djatmika. (2008). Problem Menegakkan Substantif. Harian Jawa Pos, (10 December 2008).

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 131 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 113 times



DOI: 10.47268/palau.v1i1.6



Copyright (c) 2016 Arman Anwar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.