Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction

Jan Samuel Maringka

doi:10.47268/palau.v1i2.90

Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction

Jan Samuel Maringka⁽¹⁾

(1) Solicitor General Of Republic Indonesia, Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

On extradition law in Indonesia is based from the fact that since the adoption of the Act in 1979, there have been fundamental changes in the criminal procedure ode in Indonesia, namely the enactment of Law No. 8 of 1981 on Criminal Proceedings and has the ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Politics Rights (International Convention on Civil and political Rights, abbreviated as ICCPR) under Law No. 12 of 2005 which requires Indonesia to immediately adjust its positive legal provisions in accordance with the principles set out in the ICCPR. Considering the purpose of extradition implementation as an effort to support law enforcement process and related to examination process in extradition case which is not different from the stages of case handling process as regulated in criminal procedure law, it is necessary to affirm the concept of extradition as an integral part of the enforcement process law so that the principle of due process can be implemented consequently in the process of extradition implementation.

Keywords

extradition; criminal justice system

DOI

10.47268/palau.v1i2.90

Published

2017-03-31

How To Cite

APA: Maringka, J.S. (2017). Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction. Pattimura Law Journal, 1(2), 79 - 97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i2.90.

IEEE: J.S. Maringka, "Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction", Pattimura Law J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79 - 97, Mar. 2017. Accessed on: Dec. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i2.90

Harvard: Maringka, J.S., (2017). "Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction". Pattimura Law Journal, Volume 1(2), pp. 79 - 97. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i2.90 (Accessed on: 21 December 2024)

Chicago: Maringka, Jan Samuel. "Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction." Pattimura Law Journal 1, no. 2 (March 31, 2017): 79 - 97. Accessed December 21, 2024. doi:10.47268/palau.v1i2.90

Vancouver: Maringka JS. Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction. Pattimura Law J. [Internet]. 2017 Mar 31 [cited 2024 Dec 21];1(2):79 - 97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i2.90

MLA 8th: Maringka, Jan Samuel. "Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction." Pattimura Law Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, 31 Mar. 2017, pp. 79 - 97, doi:10.47268/palau.v1i2.90. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{PALAU90,
		author = {Jan Maringka},
		title = {Extradition In Criminal Justice System Related To Foreign Jurisdiction},
		journal = {Pattimura Law Journal},
		volume = {1},
		number = {2},
		year = {2017},
		keywords = {extradition; criminal justice system},
		abstract = {On extradition law in Indonesia is based from the fact that since the adoption of the Act in 1979, there have been fundamental changes in the criminal procedure ode in Indonesia, namely the enactment of Law No. 8 of 1981 on Criminal Proceedings and has the ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Politics Rights (International Convention on Civil and political Rights, abbreviated as ICCPR) under Law No. 12 of 2005 which requires Indonesia to immediately adjust its positive legal provisions in accordance with the principles set out in the ICCPR. Considering the purpose of extradition implementation as an effort to support law enforcement process and related to examination process in extradition case which is not different from the stages of case handling process as regulated in criminal procedure law, it is necessary to affirm the concept of extradition as an integral part of the enforcement process law so that the principle of due process can be implemented consequently in the process of extradition implementation.},
				issn = {2527-7316},		pages = {79--97}			doi = {10.47268/palau.v1i2.90},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/palau/article/view/90}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Abdussalam, H.R. (2006).Hukum Pidana Internasional, Jakarta: Restu Agung.

Adji, Oemar Seno. (1980).Hukum-Hakim Pidana.Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

------------------------, (1981).Hukum (Acara) Pidana Dalam Prospeksi, Second Edion. Jakarta: Erlangga.f

Afiah, Ratna Nurul. (1986). Praperadilan dan Ruang Lingkupnya. Jakarta: Akademika Press-indo.

Amnesty International. (2012). The Human Rights Committee's New General Comment On The Right To Liberty And Security Of Person. London: Amnesty International Publications.

Arief, Basrief, Kajian Kelembagaan Kedudukan "Central Authority" di Indonesia dalam Kerjasama Penanganan Perkara Pidana, Makalah, Jakarta, Januari 2012

Asikin, Zainal. (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Atmasasmita, Romli, (1996).Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perspektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisionisme, Bandung: Bina Cipta.

-------------------------. (2001). Hukum Tentang Ekstradisi. Jakarta: PT Fikahati Aneska.

-------------------------. (2010).Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana.

Bantekas, Ilias and Susan Nash. (2007). International Criminal Law, Third Edition, Riutledge-Candevish, United Kingdom.

Bassiouni, C. (1974). International Extradition and World Order. Stijthoff International Publishing Company.

Berman, Harold J. (ed.). (1996). Ceramah-Ceramah Tentang Hukum Amerika Serikat. Translate by Gregory Churchill. Jakarta: PT. Tatanusa.

Bradley, Craig M. (ed.). (2007). Criminal Procedure, a Worlds Wide Study, 2nd ed, Durham NC: Carolina Academic Press.

Broome, John. Transnational Crime in The Twenty-First Century. Paper presented in the Transnational Crime Conference, orginized by the Australian Institute of Criminology in cooperation with the Australian Federal Ploce Force and Australia Custom Service. March 2000. Canberra.

Buana, Mirza Satria. (2007). Hukum Internasional Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Nusamedia.

Cranston, Maurice. (1973). What are Human Rights? Taplinger. New York.

Csabafi, Imre Anthony. (1971). The Concept of State Jurisdiction in International Space Law, Leiden: Martinus Nijhof Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0921-3

Devine, Carol, et.al. (1999). Human Rights:The Essential Reference. Phoenix, USA: Oryx Press.

De Cruz, Peter. (2010). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. Translate by Narulita Yusron, Jakarta: Nusa Media/Diadit Media.

Djajaatmadja, Bambang Iriana. (1992). Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Cetakan Pertama, Edisi ke-10. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Donnely, Jack. (2003). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, Ithacaand London: Cornell University Press.

Effendy, Marwan. (2005). Kejaksaan RI, Posisi dan Fungsinya Dari Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

El-Ayouty, Yassin, et.al, (2000). Government Ethics and Law Enforcement:Toward Global Guidelines, Praeger Publishers. Westport, USA.

Esmain Trans. (1968). History of Continental Criminal Procedure. New York, N.Y: Augustus M. Kelley.

Falk, Richard. (1981). Human Rights and State Sovereignty. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.

Fowler, Michael Ross. (1995). Law, Power, and the Sovereign State:The Evolution and Application of the Concept of Sovereignty. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Gilbert, Geoff. (2006). Responding to Intenational Crime. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004152762.i-495

Grote, Ranier. (1994). Protection of Individual in the Pre-Trial Procedure. David Weissbrodt & Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), The Right To a Fair Trial, Springer, Berlin, New York, Singapore, Tokyo.

Hamzah, Andi dan Irdan Dahlan. (1984).Perbandingan KUHAP HIR dan Komentar. Jakarta: Ghalia.

Hamzah, Andi. (1994).Pelaksanaan Peradilan Pidana Berdasar Teori Dan Praktek, Penahanan-Dakwaan-Requisitoir. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

-----------------. (2009). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Ed-2, cet-3, Jakarta Sinar Grafika,.

Hamzah, H. Bachtiar. (1997). Hukum Internasional I. Medan: USU Press.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (2002). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali)". Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

-------------------------. (2003). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hatta, Moh. (2009). Beberapa Masalah Penegakan Hukum Pidana Umum dan Pidana Khusus. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Hulsman, L.H.C. (1984). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum, translate by Soedjono D. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Kaligis, O.C., Rusdi Nurima, Deni Kailimang. (1983). Praperadilan Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Erlangga..

Kaligis, O.C. (2006).Perlindungan Hukum Atas Tersangka, Terdakwa Dan Terpidana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Karlen, Delmar, Geoffrey Sawer, dan Edward M. Wise. (1967).Anglo-American Criminal Justice. New York : Oxford University Press.

Kusumaatmaja, Mochtar. (2002). Konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan, Bandung: Alumni.

LeGrande, James L. (1973). The Basic Process of Criminal Justice, New York and Beverly Hills: Glencoe Press.

Lubis, Todung Mulya. (2005). Jalan Panjang Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mahfud MD. (2006). Membangun Politik Hukum Menegakan Konstitusi. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Margolies, Daniel S. (2011). Spaces of Law in American Foreign Relations: Extradition and Extraterritoriality in the Borderlands and beyond, 1877-1898. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Mauna, Boer.(2000).Hukum Internasional, Pengertian Peranan Dan Fungsi Dalam Era Dinamika Global. Bandung: PT Alumni.

Mueller, Gerhard O.W. dan Fré Le Poole-Griffiths. (1969). Comparative Criminal Procedure. New York: New York University Press.

Mujahidin, Ahmad. (2007). Peradilan Satu Atap di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditam.

Muladi. (2005). Hak Asassi Manusia, Hakekat, Konsep dan Implikasinya dalam Persepktif Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

-----------------, Pemahaman HAM Dan Perkembangannya Dalam Rangka Memperkokoh Keutuhan NKRI Dan Mendukung Kemandirian Bangsa (Materi Kuliah Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, MIH UNDIP Semarang)

Mulyadi, Lilik. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana, Normatif, Teoritis Praktik dan Permasalahannya. Bandung: Alumni.

Muslimin, H. Amrah, dkk.(1981). Kumpulan Pidato-Pidato Pengukuhan, Beberapa Guru Besar Berbicara Tentang Hukum dan Pendidikan Hukum, Bandung: Alumni.

M, Dikdik, Arief Mansyur dan Elisatris Gultom. (2007).Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatanantara Norma dan Realita. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Nasution, Adnan Buyung.(1981). Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: LP3ES.

Nasution, Faisal Akbar.(2009). Pemerintah Daerah dan Sumber-Sumber Pendapatan Asli Daerah. Jakarta: Sofmedia.

Nijboer, J.F., (2005). Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure. An Introduction. Kleuwer: Deventer.

O.S. Hiariej, Eddy, (2009).Pengantar Hukum Pidana Internasional, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Oppenheim, L., (1960).International Law A Treaties, 8 th edition, vol. On Peace. London: Longmans, Green & Co.

Packer, Herbert L. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, California: Stanford

Pangaribuan, Luhut M.P. (2009)Lay Judges & Hakim Ad Hoc, Suatu Studi Teoritis Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia/Papas Sinar Sinanti. Jakarta.

Parthiana, I Wayan. (1990).Ekstradisi Dalam Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Nasional Indonesia.Bandung: Mandar Maju.

-------------------------, (2004). Hukum Pidana Internasional dan Ekstradisi, Bandung: Yrama Widy.

-------------------------,(2004).Ekstradisi Dalam Hukum Internasional Modern.Bandung: Yrama Widy.

Philpott, Daniel, (2001).Revolutions in Sovereignty:How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Poernomo, Bambang. (1988).Pola Dasar Teori dan Azas Umum Hukum Acara Pidana.Yogyakarta: Penerbit Libert.

Prasetyo, Teguh dan Abdul Halim barkatullah. (2013).Filsafat, Teori Dan Ilmu Hukum,Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat Yang Berkeadilan Dan Bermartabat. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman. (1984).Kedudukan Tersangka dan Terdakwa Dalam Pemeriksaan.2nd ed. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. (1981).Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Jakarta: Sinar Baru.

-----------------------. (2003).Sisi-sisi lain dari hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Buku Kompas.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2010).Penegakan hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas.

Reksodiputro, Mardjono. (1994). Hak Asasi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Buku Ketiga. Pusat Pelayanan dan Pengabdian Hukum (d/h Lembaga Kriminologi) Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Sabuan, Ansorie, Syarifuddin Pettanasse, Ruben Achmad. (1990).Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Angkasa.

Santoso, Topo.(2000).Polisi dan Jaksa: Keterpaduan atau Pergulatan?. Depok: Pusat Studi Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (Centre for Indonesian criminal Justice Studies).

------------------, 2012, "Suatu Tinjauan Atas Efektivitas Pemidanaan", Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif, Agustinus Pohan , Topo Santoso, Martin Moerings (ed), Edisi.1, Denpasar (Pustaka Larasan); Jakarta (Universitas Indonesia), Universitas Leiden, Universitas Groningen,

Sardjono. (1996).Kerjasama Internasional di Bidang Kepolisian, Jakarta: NCB-Interpol.

Sarkar S.C. (1984). The Law of Criminal Procedure. 5 th ed. Rev. Prabhas S. Sarkar and Kshitis C. Ray. S.C. Sarkar & Sons (Private) Ltd: Calcutta..

Setiardjo, Gunawan. (1993). Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan Ideologi Pancasila, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Shawn, Malcom Nathan.(1994).International Law.Inggris. Cambridge University Press.

Skinner, B.F. (2002). Operant Conditioning. B. F. Skinner Foundation.

Silaban, M.H. (1987).Kasasi. Upaya Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: CV Sumber Ilmu Jaya.

Smith, Rhona K. (2008). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia UII.

Starke, JG. (1984).Introduction to International Law, Butterworth, 9th ed. London.

Subekti, R. (1984).Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam KUHAP. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Sudarsono. (1991). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Sumartini, L. (1996).Pembahasan Perkembangan Hukum Nasional tentanng Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: BPHN Depkehdan HAM RI.

Surachman, RM. dan Jan S Maringka. (2014).Peran Jaksa dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Kawasan Asia Pasifik.Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Susanto, Agus. (2014).Hukum, Moral dan Keadilan, Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Kencana Prenada. Jakarta: Media Grup.

Sutomo Surtiatmodjo. (1971)."Penangkapan Dan Penahanan Di Indonesia". Jakarta: Pradnja Paramira.

Tak, Peter J.P. (ed), Tasks and Powers of the Prosecutor Services in the EU Member States. Nijmegen. Wolf Legal Publishers.

Tanusoebroto, S. (1983).Peranan Pra Peradilan Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.Bandung: Alumni.

Thontowi, Jawahir dan Pranoto Iskandar. (2006).Hukum Internasional Kontemporer. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Tresna, R.(1977).Peradilan di Indonesia dari Abad ke Abad. 2nd edition. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Triatmojo, Sudibyo. (1982).Pelaksanaan Penahanan Dan Kemungkinan Yang Ada Dalam KUHAP. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.

United Nations Centre for Human Rights. (1994).Human Rights and Pretrial Detention (A Handbook Of International Standards Relating To Pretrial Detention). Geneva: United Nation Publications.

United Nations.(2004). United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime. Vienna: United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime.

United Nations, Eigth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba 27 August to 7 September 1990, A/Conf.144/7, 26 July 1990

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes (UNODC). (2012).Manual on Mutual Legal Assistance and Extradition.New York: United Nations.

Van Apeldoorn, L.J. (2001).Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Wagley, John R. (2006).Transnational Organized Crime:Principal Threats and U.S. Responses, Congressional Research Service. USA: The Library of Congress.

Wetson, Paul B. & Kenneth M. Wells. (1973).The Administration of Justice. 2nd ed., Inc, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Wisnusubroto, Al. dan G.Widairtama. (2005). Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung:Citra Aditya Bakti.

Yayasan Pengembangan Hak Asasi Manusia (HRRC). (2011). Rule of Law untuk Hak Asasi Manusia di Kawasan ASEAN: Studi Data Awal. Jakarta.

Yee, Sienho (ed), (2001).International Law in the Post-Cold War World:Essays in Memory of Li Haopei, Routledge. London.

Balakrisnan, Subrahmania Iyer. Speedy and Fair Administration of Justice. UNAFEI Report. No. 15, November 1978.

Mueller, Gerhard O. W., 1998, "Transnational Crime: Definitions and Concepts, Transnational Organized Crime vol. 4

Olii, Mohammad Irvan"Sempitnya Dunia, Luasnya Kejahatan? Sebuah Telaah Ringkas Tentang Transnational Crime", Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia Vol. 4 No. I September 2005

Philpott, Daniel, 1995, Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History, : Journal of International Affairs. Volume: 48, Columbia University School of International Public Affairs.

Husein, Yunus, "Perspektif dan Upaya yang Dilakukan dalam Perjanjian Bantuan Timbal Balik Mengenai Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang", (Makalah disampaikan pada "Seminar Tentang Bantuan Timbal Balik dalam Masalah Pidana yang diselenggarakan oleh BPHN pada tanggal 29- 30 Agustus 2006, di Bandung).

Ramelan. "Pandangan Kejaksaan Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Masa Depan." Makalah untuk Seminar Selapa Polri. 24 Juni 1999

Reksodiputro, Mardjono, "Hak-Hak Tersangka dan Terdakwa dalam KUHAP sebagai Bagian dari Hak-Hak Warga Negara (Civil Rights)", (makalah yang disampaikan dalam seminar sehari tentang KUHAP yang diselenggarakan FHUI, pada tanggal 6 Maret 1990 di Jakarta.