Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian

Muhammad Rum Siolimbona; Saartje Sarah Alfons; Hendrik Salmon

doi:10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051

Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian

Muhammad Rum Siolimbona⁽¹⁾, Saartje Sarah Alfons⁽²⁾, Hendrik Salmon⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not have a provision that gives the Constitutional Court the authority to examine Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws but in fact the Constitutional Court examines Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws.

Purposes of the Research: the purpose of this article is to find out the existence of government regulations in lieu of laws and the authority of the Constitutional Court to examine government regulations in lieu of laws.

Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.

Results of the Research: Hierarchically, government regulations in lieu of laws are parallel to laws and serve to replace laws that were issued in the event of a compelling emergency. The content material contained in the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law is the same as the Law. The Constitutional Court is based on Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, where a judge cannot reject a case that is brought to him on the grounds that there is no law. According to the principle of ius curia novit, the judge can conduct rechtvinding. The essence of the establishment of the Constitutional Court is to guarantee human rights, for that the Constitutional Court must fulfill the constitutional rights of citizens, by which the testing of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law by the Constitutional Court is allowed and does not violate the law.

Keywords

Existence; Government Regulation in Lieu of Law; Authority of the Constitutional Court

DOI

10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051

Published

2022-08-31

How To Cite

APA: Siolimbona, M.R., Alfons, S.S., & Salmon, H. (2022). Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 2(2), 141–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051.

IEEE: M.R. Siolimbona, S.S. Alfons, and H. Salmon, "Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian", Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 141–160, Aug. 2022. Accessed on: Apr. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051

Harvard: Siolimbona, M.R., Alfons, S.S., and Salmon, H., (2022). "Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian". PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, Volume 2(2), pp. 141–160. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051 (Accessed on: 30 April 2025)

Chicago: Siolimbona, Muhammad Rum, Saartje Sarah Alfons, and Hendrik Salmon. "Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 2, no. 2 (August 31, 2022): 141–160. Accessed April 30, 2025. doi:10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051

Vancouver: Siolimbona MR, Alfons SS, Salmon H. Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian. Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev. [Internet]. 2022 Aug 31 [cited 2025 Apr 30];2(2):141–160. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051

MLA 8th: Siolimbona, Muhammad Rum, Saartje Sarah Alfons, and Hendrik Salmon. "Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, vol. 2, no. 2, 31 Aug. 2022, pp. 141–160, doi:10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051. Accessed 30 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{pamali1051,
		author = {Muhammad Siolimbona and Saartje Alfons and Hendrik Salmon},
		title = {Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian},
		journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review},
		volume = {2},
		number = {2},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Existence; Government Regulation in Lieu of Law; Authority of the Constitutional Court},
		abstract = {Introduction: The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not have a provision that gives the Constitutional Court the authority to examine Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws but in fact the Constitutional Court examines Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws.Purposes of the Research: the purpose of this article is to find out the existence of government regulations in lieu of laws and the authority of the Constitutional Court to examine government regulations in lieu of laws.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.Results of the Research: Hierarchically, government regulations in lieu of laws are parallel to laws and serve to replace laws that were issued in the event of a compelling emergency. The content material contained in the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law is the same as the Law. The Constitutional Court is based on Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, where a judge cannot reject a case that is brought to him on the grounds that there is no law. According to the principle of ius curia novit, the judge can conduct rechtvinding. The essence of the establishment of the Constitutional Court is to guarantee human rights, for that the Constitutional Court must fulfill the constitutional rights of citizens, by which the testing of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law by the Constitutional Court is allowed and does not violate the law. },
				issn = {2775-5649},		pages = {141--160}			doi = {10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/1051}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 779 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 673 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Muhammad Rum Siolimbona; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Saartje Sarah Alfons; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Hendrik Salmon; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Existence; Government Regulation in Lieu of Law; Authority of the Constitutional Court

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not have a provision that gives the Constitutional Court the authority to examine Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws but in fact the Constitutional Court examines Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws.Purposes of the Research: the purpose of this article is to find out the existence of government regulations in lieu of laws and the authority of the Constitutional Court to examine government regulations in lieu of laws.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.Results of the Research: Hierarchically, government regulations in lieu of laws are parallel to laws and serve to replace laws that were issued in the event of a compelling emergency. The content material contained in the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law is the same as the Law. The Constitutional Court is based on Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, where a judge cannot reject a case that is brought to him on the grounds that there is no law. According to the principle of ius curia novit, the judge can conduct rechtvinding. The essence of the establishment of the Constitutional Court is to guarantee human rights, for that the Constitutional Court must fulfill the constitutional rights of citizens, by which the testing of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law by the Constitutional Court is allowed and does not violate the law.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Postgraduate Program in Law, Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2022-08-31

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/1051

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/pamali.v2i2.1051

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review; Vol 2, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, SEPTEMBER 2022

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files	Eksistensi Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian (359KB)

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..