Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pertama Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara

Novalin Noya(1email), Elsa Rina Maya Toule(2), Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Confiscation of assets of criminal acts of corruption at the investigation stage as the first effort in recovering state losses within the Prosecutor's Office, especially at the Maluku.

Purposes of the Research:  This study aims to analyze and explain what are the legal considerations and explain what factors are the obstacles faced by prosecutors in confiscating assets in corruption cases.

Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative legal research, meaning research that has an object of study on rules or regulations. The problem approach is in the form of a Legislative Approach (Statute Approach), a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach), and a case approach (Case Approach). The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The collection technique is done through literature study and qualitative analysis of legal materials.

Results of the Research: The results of the study indicate that the return of state assets has not been optimal because there are still many state losses that have not been returned because there are several weaknesses so that improvements need to be made to realize good governance. In addition, there are still inhibiting factors or obstacles in returning the assets of the criminal act of corruption which is marked by the lack of good coordination in the legal structure, the lack of human resources in the internal prosecutor's office, facilities and infrastructure, and the lack of participation from the public who tend to be apathetic. To overcome the obstacles and obstacles in the settlement of cases of criminal acts of corruption closely related to the confiscation of assets carried out by the Prosecutor's Office, cooperation and coordination with related technical fields are needed both in the internal and external environment.

Keywords


Asset confiscation; Corruption Crimes; Return of State Losses


DOI


10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1052

Published


2023-04-11

How To Cite


APA: Noya, N., Toule, E.R., & Hehanussa, D.J. (2023). Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pertama Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 3(1), 12–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1052.
IEEE: N. Noya, E.R. Toule, and D.J. Hehanussa, "Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pertama Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara", Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–38, Apr. 2023. Accessed on: Jul. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1052
Harvard: Noya, N., Toule, E.R., and Hehanussa, D.J., (2023). "Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pertama Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara". PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, Volume 3(1), pp. 12–38. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1052 (Accessed on: 16 July 2024)
Chicago: Noya, Novalin, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa. "Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pertama Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 3, no. 1 (April 11, 2023): 12–38. Accessed July 16, 2024. doi:10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1052
Vancouver: Noya N, Toule ER, Hehanussa DJ. Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pertama Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev. [Internet]. 2023 Apr 11 [cited 2024 Jul 16];3(1):12–38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1052
MLA 8th: Noya, Novalin, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa. "Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pertama Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, vol. 3, no. 1, 11 Apr. 2023, pp. 12–38, doi:10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1052. Accessed 16 Jul. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{pamali1052,
		author = {Novalin Noya and Elsa Toule and Deassy Hehanussa},
		title = {Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Pertama Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara},
		journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review},
		volume = {3},
		number = {1},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Asset confiscation; Corruption Crimes; Return of State Losses},
		abstract = {Introduction: Confiscation of assets of criminal acts of corruption at the investigation stage as the first effort in recovering state losses within the Prosecutor's Office, especially at the Maluku.Purposes of the Research:  This study aims to analyze and explain what are the legal considerations and explain what factors are the obstacles faced by prosecutors in confiscating assets in corruption cases.Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative legal research, meaning research that has an object of study on rules or regulations. The problem approach is in the form of a Legislative Approach (Statute Approach), a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach), and a case approach (Case Approach). The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The collection technique is done through literature study and qualitative analysis of legal materials.Results of the Research: The results of the study indicate that the return of state assets has not been optimal because there are still many state losses that have not been returned because there are several weaknesses so that improvements need to be made to realize good governance. In addition, there are still inhibiting factors or obstacles in returning the assets of the criminal act of corruption which is marked by the lack of good coordination in the legal structure, the lack of human resources in the internal prosecutor's office, facilities and infrastructure, and the lack of participation from the public who tend to be apathetic. To overcome the obstacles and obstacles in the settlement of cases of criminal acts of corruption closely related to the confiscation of assets carried out by the Prosecutor's Office, cooperation and coordination with related technical fields are needed both in the internal and external environment.},
				issn = {2775-5649},		pages = {12--38}			doi = {10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1052},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/1052}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Adolop Seleky, Salmon Nirahua, and Patrick Corputty. 2022. “Kewenangan Penetapan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 no (1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i1.5928.

Agustinus Herimulyanto, “Sita Aset Berbasis Nilai dan Pembuktian dalam Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia”, Penyampaian Penelitian Dalam Disertasi Ujian Terbuka Program Doktor di Fakuktas Hukum UGM, Jumat, 5 Oktober 2018.

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI, Laporan Lokakarya Tentang Pengambilan Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2009.

Basrief Arief, Pemulihan Aset Hasil Kejahatan dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Workshop Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana, Jakarta: Mahupiki, 2014.

Darwis Tirande, Salmon Nirahua, and Elsa Toule. 2022. “Kriminologis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 no (2), 133-50. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6435.

Evi Hartanti, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.

Ferry Makawimbang Hernold, Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Suatu Pendekatan Hukum Progresif, Yogyakarta: Thefa Media, 2014.

Gunawan Sunendar, Penanganan Korupsi Tidak Lagi Berorientasi Pada Kerugian Negara. 2009.

Harun M.Husen, Kejahatan dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1990.

I Gusti Ketut Ariawan, Stolen Asset Recovery, Suatu Harapan Dalam Pengembalian Aset Negara, Jakarta: Kertha Patrika, 2008.

Ismansyah, Penerapan dan pelaksanaan Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Demokrasi (ejournal.unp.ac.id) 6, no 2 (2007).

Muchsin, Ikhtisar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Iblam, 2006.

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2007.

Nashriana, Aset recovery dalam tindak pidana korupsi: Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Peter Marzuki Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada, Jakarta : Media Group, 2010.

Purwanibng M. Yanuar, Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi: Berdasarkan Konversi PBB Anti Korupsi 2003 Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Bandung: Alumni, 2007

Randy Ferdiansyah, Tujuan Hukum Menurut Gustav Radbruch, http://hukumindo.com/2011/11/artikel-politik-hukum-tujuan-hukum.html.

Soedjono Dirjosisworo, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1983.

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: UI Pres, 1983.

Sonny Pungus, Teori Tujuan Hukum, http://sonny-tobelo.com/2010/10/teori-tujuan hukum-gustav-radbruch-dan.html.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, (Yogyakarta: Liberty 2003.

Suhariyono AR, Rancangan Undang-undang tentang Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana, Workshop Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana, Jakarta: Mahupiki, 28-29 Agustus 2014.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 691 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 650 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Novalin Noya, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.