The Existence of an Integrated Law Enforcement Center in the Settlement of General Election Crimes at the General Election Supervisory Agency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i3.2220Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Criminal, ElectionAbstract
Introduction: The existence of Gakkumdu as an integrated law enforcement center has an important role in handling election crimes which aims to equlize understanding of the handling of election crime violations by Bawaslu, the Police and the Prosecutor’s office. The presence of Gakkumdu as a manifestation of judicial power which is given attribution authority by Law Number 7 07 2017 cncerning Election is a bright spot for legal certainly regarding the handling of criminal election violations; however, Gakkumdu’s authority is not yet completely independent in handling election criminal violations because it it still tied to the respective agencies of origin so that sectoral subjectivity and ego can sometimes influence decision regarding handling election criminal violations.
Purposes of the Research: Examining and explaining the existence of the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Gakkumdu) in resolving election crimes in the Tanimbar Islands Regency and reviewing and explaining the factors that influence the resolution of election crimes in the Tanimbar Islands Regency by the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Gakkumdu).
Methods of the Research: The Research method used is empirical legal research. Research approaches are a case approach, a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Techniques for collecting legal materials through documentation studies and field research and then analyzed through persepective using qualitative methods.
Results Main Findings of the Research: The expected result I that when talking about alleged criminal election violations, that hope is in the hands of the Gakkumdu Center, the election supervisory institution only as an entry point, the analysis and subsequent decisions rest on the shoulders of the Gakkumdu center (Election supervisor, Police and Prosecutor’s Office) and on their shoulders. Hopefully there is still a glimmer of hope for the enforcement of election crimes in Indonesia.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Adri Husin and Budi Rizki Husin. Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung. 2015.
Ali Imran Nasution, Davilla Prawidya Azaria, Muhammad Fauzan, “Penguatan Fungsi Pengawasan Bawaslu Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelenggaraan Tahapan Kampanye Pemilu Serentak 2024”, Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2023).
Alrhega Caesar Grestiano and Kolang Muhammad Dinul Akram, “Eksistensi Sentra Gakkumdu Sebagai Penegak Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu”, Jurnal Pettarani Election Review 1, no. 2 (2020).
Benyamin Buntu, La Ode Husen & Nurul Qamar, “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum Oleh Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu (Gakkumdu): Studi Di Kota Makassar”, Journal of Lex Generalis 3, no. 3 (2022).
Budi Nuryanto, “Fungsi Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu (Gakkumdu) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu Tahun 2019 Di Kabupaten Cianjur”, Journal Justiciabellen 01, no. 02 (2021).
Elfahmi Lubis Dan Mona Agustina Nedy, “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu Oleh Sentra Gakkumdu”, Jupank (Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan) 2, no. 2 (2022).
Fikri Rizki, Amsori, “Analisis Hukum Tentang Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Mengenai Tindak Pidana Dalam Proses Pemilihan Umum”, Journal Evidence of Law 2, no 2 (2023).
Hasrul Fitriyadia , H.M. Pangeranb , Amir Ilyasc, “Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum Oleh Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu (Gakkumdu)”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau 9, no. 1, (2020): 44-62.
Irwan, Alexander and Edriana, Pemilu, Pelanggaran Asas Luber, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1995.
Satjipto Rahardjo. Masalah Penegakan Hukum. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1983.
Sarah Bambang, Sri Setyadji and Aref Darmawan, “Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu Dalam Sentra Penegakkan Hukum Terpadu (Gakkumdu)”, Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi 2, no. 2 (2021).
Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2002.
Theo Huijbers. Filsafat Hukum. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1991.
Topo Santoso et. at, Penegakan Hukum Pemilu, Praktek Pemilu 2004, Kajian Pemilu 2009 – 2014.
Wiwik Afifah, “Tindak Pidana Pemilu Legislatif di Indonesia”, Mimbar Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, (2014).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Melky Iron Supusepa, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, Reimon Supusepa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
