Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Persimpangan: Menelusuri Upaya Pelemahan Dan Dampaknya Bagi Hukum Dan Demokrasi
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: This article discusses the position of the Constitutional Court (MK) in Indonesia in the context of the attempts to weaken it and its impact on law and democracy.
Purposes of the Research: This research identifies several factors that contribute to the Constitutional Court's challenges, such as political interference, corruption, and legislation that harms the institution's independence
Methods of the Research: Using literature methods, this research analyzes various secondary sources, including books, academic articles, and official reports relating to constitutional and judicial issues
Results of the Research: Weakening of the Constitutional Court (MK) can be divided into two categories: external and internal. External factors include the lack of strengthening authority in the Constitutional Court Law, political efforts in appointing judges, and the removal of judges by the DPR without legal basis. Meanwhile, internal factors come from ethical violations of judges affiliated with politics and inconsistencies in decisions. Strengthening the Constitutional Court institution is needed through a transparent judge selection process and supervision from the Judicial Commission, concluding that efforts to strengthen the Constitutional Court are very important in maintaining justice and democracy in Indonesia. Recommendations are proposed to increase the independence and accountability of the Constitutional Court, including the need for structural reform and strengthening supervisory mechanisms. Thus, this research contributes to understanding the importance of the role of the Constitutional Court in a healthy legal system and democracy.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/pamali.v4i3.2371
Published
2024-11-29
How To Cite
@article{pamali2371, author = {Hilda Salsabil}, title = {Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Persimpangan: Menelusuri Upaya Pelemahan Dan Dampaknya Bagi Hukum Dan Demokrasi}, journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review}, volume = {4}, number = {3}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Constitutional Court; Weakening; Law; and Democracy.}, abstract = {Introduction: This article discusses the position of the Constitutional Court (MK) in Indonesia in the context of the attempts to weaken it and its impact on law and democracy.Purposes of the Research: This research identifies several factors that contribute to the Constitutional Court's challenges, such as political interference, corruption, and legislation that harms the institution's independenceMethods of the Research: Using literature methods, this research analyzes various secondary sources, including books, academic articles, and official reports relating to constitutional and judicial issuesResults of the Research: Weakening of the Constitutional Court (MK) can be divided into two categories: external and internal. External factors include the lack of strengthening authority in the Constitutional Court Law, political efforts in appointing judges, and the removal of judges by the DPR without legal basis. Meanwhile, internal factors come from ethical violations of judges affiliated with politics and inconsistencies in decisions. Strengthening the Constitutional Court institution is needed through a transparent judge selection process and supervision from the Judicial Commission, concluding that efforts to strengthen the Constitutional Court are very important in maintaining justice and democracy in Indonesia. Recommendations are proposed to increase the independence and accountability of the Constitutional Court, including the need for structural reform and strengthening supervisory mechanisms. Thus, this research contributes to understanding the importance of the role of the Constitutional Court in a healthy legal system and democracy.}, issn = {2775-5649}, pages = {419--435} doi = {10.47268/pamali.v4i3.2371}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/2371} }
Artikel Jurnal
Amnan, Durohim, ‘LegalitaS PemeCatan HaKim ASWanto Di Tengah MaSa Jabatan Oleh DeWan PerWaKilan RaKYat’, Jatiswara, 38.1 (2023).
Azis, Fuad Abdul, and Irham Ramur, ‘Analisis Kewenangan Dpr Terhadap Polemik Penggantian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Lisyabab : Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 4.1 (2023), pp. 71–83, doi:10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v4i1.153.
Indramayu, Indramayu, Jayus Jayus, and Rosita Indrayati, ‘Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi Yang Berkualifikasi’, E-Journal Lentera Hukum, 4.1 (2017), p. 1, doi:10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.5267.
Isra, Saldi, ‘Titik Singgung Wewenang Mahkamah Agung’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4.1 (2015), pp. 17–30.
Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam, ‘Implication of Selection Mechanism Towards Integrity and Independency of Constitutional Court Judges in Indonesia’, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9.1 (2021), pp. 112–38, doi:10.29303/ius.v9i1.871.
Subandri, Rio, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Persyaratan Batas Usia Pencalonan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden’, 2.1 (2024), pp. 135–53, doi:10.51903/jaksa.v2i1.1512.
Syandhira Suzeeta, Nala, and Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba, ‘Pelanggaran Kode Etik Oleh Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023’, Pelanggaran Kode Etik (Suzeeta, Dkk.) Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1.11 (2023), pp. 255–62, doi:10.5281/zenodo.10252190.
Topane, Gayus Lumbun, ‘Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Oleh Dpr Ri’, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 6.3 (2009).
Viktoris Dahoklory, Madaskolay, ‘Menilik Arah Politik Perubahan Undang-Undang MK’, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50.2 (2011), pp. 222–31.
Wahyu Aji Ramadan, Irma Aulia Pertiwi Nusantara, Tanti Mitasari, ‘Reformulasi Pengawasan Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Jurnal Studia Legalia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3.2 (2022), pp. 21–43.
Wicaksono, Agung Tri, Achmad Arby Nur, Sayidatul Mar’ah, and Ernawati Huroiroh, ‘Praktik Inkonstitusional Pemberhentian Hakim Konstitusi Pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia’, Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 2.1 (2023), pp. 1–24, doi:10.30762/vjhtn.v2i1.217.
Buku
Mahfud, Moh, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945 (2008)
———, Rambu Pembatas Dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi (2009)
Gani, A. (2020). Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Mahfud, M. D. (2021). Konstitusi dan Keadilan: Menjaga Integritas Lembaga Peradilan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gadjah Mada.
Tanjung, R. (2019). Dinamika Hukum dan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Alumni.
Sudrajat, H. (2022). Peradilan Konstitusi dan Tantangan Modernitas. Bandung: Penerbit Rosda.
Skripsi, Tesis, Distertasi, Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain
Ardhi, Satria, ‘Pandangan Pakar UGM Terkait Putusan MK Soal Batas Usia Capres-Cawapres’, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2023 (https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/pandangan-pakar-ugm-terkait-putusan-mk-soal-batas-usia-capres-cawapres/)
Badan Pengembangan Dan Pembinaan Bahasa, ‘KBBI’, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2016) https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/pelemahan
‘Indeks Demokrasi Turun, Kebebasan Pers Turut Terancam’, Kompas.Id, 2024 (https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2024/01/31/indeks-demokrasi-turun-kebebasan-pers-turut-terancam)
Ketua Komisi Ii Dpr Dorong Perkuat Mk, Singgung Amandemen Konstitusi’, Detik News, 2024 <https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7533707/ketua-komisi-ii-dpr-dorong-perkuat-mk-singgung-amandemen-konstitusi>
Madrim, Sasmito, ‘LSI: Mayoritas Warga Nilai Putusan MK Soal Usia Capres-Cawapres Tidak Adil’, VOA Indonesia, 2023 (https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/lsi-mayoritas-warga-nilai-putusan-mk-soal-usia-capres-cawapres-tidak-adil/7322100.html)
‘Otokratisasi Adalah Suatu Proses Perubahan Sistem Politik Yang Semula Demokrasi Perlahan Bergerak Menuju Otokrasi’
‘RUU Pilkada Yang Anulir Putusan MK Akan Disahkan Besok Dalam Rapat Paripurna Artikel Ini Telah Tayang Di Kompas.Com Dengan Judul “RUU Pilkada Yang Anulir Putusan MK Akan Disahkan Besok Dalam Rapat Paripurna”, Klik Untuk Baca: Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/R’, Kompas, 2024 <https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/08/21/19054751/ruu-pilkada-yang-anulir-putusan-mk-akan-disahkan-besok-dalam-rapat-paripurna>Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Hilda Halnum Salsabil
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0