The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law

Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas Kusumawardhani(1email)


(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: This study examines the dialectical relationship between the National Criminal Code and the living law through the contemporary criminal law philosophy approach. The existence of the Criminal Code as a formal legal product of the state is often in tension with the customary law system and the values that live in pluralistic Indonesian society.

Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the patterns of interaction, contradictions, and potential harmonization between the two legal systems.

Methods of the Research: Using juridical-philosophical research methods and legal hermeneutic approaches, this study explores the ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions of the dialectic.

Results Main Findings of the Research: The results of the study show that despite paradigmatic tensions, the two legal systems can run in a complementary manner through an integrated legal pluralism recognition mechanism. This research offers a new conceptual framework in understanding the nature of criminal law that is responsive to social change but still upholds legal certainty. The findings of the research have implications for the urgency of reformulating the Criminal Code that accommodates the living law while maintaining the fundamental principles of modern criminal law, especially legality, proportionality, and protection of human rights. This dialectical approach is an important foundation for the development of a contextual, fair, and sustainable Indonesian criminal law system.

Keywords


Criminal Code; The Living Law; Legal Dialectics; Legal Pluralism; Criminal Justice System.


DOI


10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037

Published


2025-07-31

How To Cite


APA: Kusumawardhani, D.L. (2025). The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 5(2), 244-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037.
IEEE: D.L. Kusumawardhani, "The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law", Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 244-252, Jul. 2025. Accessed on: Sep. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037
Harvard: Kusumawardhani, D.L., (2025). "The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law". PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, Volume 5(2), pp. 244-252. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037 (Accessed on: 23 September 2025)
Chicago: Kusumawardhani, Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas. "The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 5, no. 2 (July 31, 2025): 244-252. Accessed September 23, 2025. doi:10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037
Vancouver: Kusumawardhani DL. The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law. Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev. [Internet]. 2025 Jul 31 [cited 2025 Sep 23];5(2):244-252. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037
MLA 8th: Kusumawardhani, Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas. "The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, vol. 5, no. 2, 31 Jul. 2025, pp. 244-252, doi:10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037. Accessed 23 Sep. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{pamali3037,
		author = {Dwinanda Kusumawardhani},
		title = {The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law},
		journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review},
		volume = {5},
		number = {2},
		year = {2025},
		keywords = {Criminal Code; The Living Law; Legal Dialectics; Legal Pluralism; Criminal Justice System.},
		abstract = {Introduction: This study examines the dialectical relationship between the National Criminal Code and the living law through the contemporary criminal law philosophy approach. The existence of the Criminal Code as a formal legal product of the state is often in tension with the customary law system and the values that live in pluralistic Indonesian society.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the patterns of interaction, contradictions, and potential harmonization between the two legal systems.Methods of the Research: Using juridical-philosophical research methods and legal hermeneutic approaches, this study explores the ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions of the dialectic.Results Main Findings of the Research: The results of the study show that despite paradigmatic tensions, the two legal systems can run in a complementary manner through an integrated legal pluralism recognition mechanism. This research offers a new conceptual framework in understanding the nature of criminal law that is responsive to social change but still upholds legal certainty. The findings of the research have implications for the urgency of reformulating the Criminal Code that accommodates the living law while maintaining the fundamental principles of modern criminal law, especially legality, proportionality, and protection of human rights. This dialectical approach is an important foundation for the development of a contextual, fair, and sustainable Indonesian criminal law system.},
				issn = {2775-5649},		pages = {244--252}			doi = {10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/3037}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Akib, Muhammad. “Refleksi Pemikiran Hukum Moderen.” Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia 27, no. 2 (2009).

Anwar, Yesmil. Pembaruan Hukum Pidana: Reformasi Hukum. Grasindo, 2008.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. “Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana:(Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru),” 2011.

Arizona, Yance. “Kedudukan Peradilan Adat Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Diskusi Tentang Memperkuat Peradilan Adat Di Kalimantan Tengah Untuk Penguatan Akses Terhadap Keadilan, 2013.

Barda Nawawi Arief, S H. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Prenada Media, 2016.

Creswell, John W, and J David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications, 2017.

Denzin, Norman K, and Yvonna S Lincoln. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. sage, 2011.

Efendi, Jonaedi, Jhonny Ibrahim, and Prasetijo Rijadi. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris,” 2016.

Ehrlich, Eugene, and Klaus A Ziegert. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Routledge, 2017.

Faisal, Ahmad. “Pemikiran Hukum Progresif Prof. Dr. Satjipto Rahardjo.” Journal of Cross Knowledge 1, no. 2 (2023): 314–28.

Gosita, Arif. “Masalah Korban Kejahatan.” Buku Dosen-2009, 2010.

Kusumawardhani, Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas. “Hukum Pidana.” Yayasan DPI, 2024.

———. “Sistem Penegakan Hukum Nasional Sebagai Bingkai Putusan Pengadilan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum STHG 1, no. 1 (2018): 44–68.

Littlefield, Neil O. “Eugen Ehrlich’s Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law.” Me. L. Rev. 19 (1967): 1.

Mahfud, Moh. Politik Hukum Di Indonesia. Lp3s, 1998.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. “Penelitian Hukum,” 2013.

Nasional, Badan Pembinaan Hukum, Petunjuk Teknis, and I BAB. “Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.” Draft Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) 1, no. 1 (2015).

Nikolas, Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah, and Sumartini Dewi. “Dasar Konseptual Dan Implementasi Restorative Justice Oleh Polri Untuk Mewujudkan Tujuan Dan Fungsi Hukum (Kepastian, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4197–4203.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, and Biarkan Hukum Mengalir. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Dasar Pembangunan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia.” In Makalah Yang Disampaikan Pada Seminar Nasional Menggagas Ilmu Hukum Progresif Di Indonesia, Di Semarang, 2004.

Rochaeti, Nur. “Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 44, no. 2 (2015): 150–60.

Sidharta, B Arief. “Refleksi Tentang Fundasi Dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia= Reflection Concerning the Foundation and Scientific Character of the Legal Science as the Basis for Developing Indonesia’a National Legal s.” Universitas Padjajaran, 1996.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Hukum Adat Indonesia, 2005.

———. “Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,” 2007.

Supusesa, Reimon. “Eksistensi Hukum Delik Adat Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Maluku Tengah.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 24, no. 1 (2012): 41–54.

Susanto, Anthon F. Ilmu Hukum Non Sistematik (Fondasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia). LoGoz Publishing, 2015.

Tamanaha, Brian Z. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford Socio-Legal Studies, 2001.

Tanya, Bernard L, Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak, and Markus Y Hage. “Teori Hukum.” Genta Publishing, 2013.

Wiranata, I Gede A B, and M H Sh. Hukum Adat Indonesia Perkembangan Dari Masa Ke Masa. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.

Yahya, Muhammad, and Deli Bunga Saravistha. “Implikasi Restorative Justice Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang KUHP.” Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti 7, no. 2 (2024): 73–81.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 239 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 70 times



 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas Kusumawardhani; Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Semarang; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Criminal Code; The Living Law; Legal Dialectics; Legal Pluralism; Criminal Justice System.
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: This study examines the dialectical relationship between the National Criminal Code and the living law through the contemporary criminal law philosophy approach. The existence of the Criminal Code as a formal legal product of the state is often in tension with the customary law system and the values that live in pluralistic Indonesian society.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the patterns of interaction, contradictions, and potential harmonization between the two legal systems.Methods of the Research: Using juridical-philosophical research methods and legal hermeneutic approaches, this study explores the ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions of the dialectic.Results Main Findings of the Research: The results of the study show that despite paradigmatic tensions, the two legal systems can run in a complementary manner through an integrated legal pluralism recognition mechanism. This research offers a new conceptual framework in understanding the nature of criminal law that is responsive to social change but still upholds legal certainty. The findings of the research have implications for the urgency of reformulating the Criminal Code that accommodates the living law while maintaining the fundamental principles of modern criminal law, especially legality, proportionality, and protection of human rights. This dialectical approach is an important foundation for the development of a contextual, fair, and sustainable Indonesian criminal law system.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Postgraduate Program in Law, Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2025-07-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/3037
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review; Vol 5, No 2 (2025): JULY
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas Kusumawardhani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.