The Dialectic of The National Criminal Code and The Living Law: A Philosophical Approach to Contemporary Criminal Law

Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas Kusumawardhani

doi:10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037

Authors

Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas Kusumawardhani Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3037

Keywords:

Criminal Code, The Living Law, Legal Dialectics, Legal Pluralism, Criminal Justice System.

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the dialectical relationship between the National Criminal Code and the living law through the contemporary criminal law philosophy approach. The existence of the Criminal Code as a formal legal product of the state is often in tension with the customary law system and the values that live in pluralistic Indonesian society.

Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the patterns of interaction, contradictions, and potential harmonization between the two legal systems.

Methods of the Research: Using juridical-philosophical research methods and legal hermeneutic approaches, this study explores the ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions of the dialectic.

Results Main Findings of the Research: The results of the study show that despite paradigmatic tensions, the two legal systems can run in a complementary manner through an integrated legal pluralism recognition mechanism. This research offers a new conceptual framework in understanding the nature of criminal law that is responsive to social change but still upholds legal certainty. The findings of the research have implications for the urgency of reformulating the Criminal Code that accommodates the living law while maintaining the fundamental principles of modern criminal law, especially legality, proportionality, and protection of human rights. This dialectical approach is an important foundation for the development of a contextual, fair, and sustainable Indonesian criminal law system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Akib, Muhammad. “Refleksi Pemikiran Hukum Moderen.” Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia 27, no. 2 (2009).

Anwar, Yesmil. Pembaruan Hukum Pidana: Reformasi Hukum. Grasindo, 2008.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. “Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana:(Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru),” 2011.

Arizona, Yance. “Kedudukan Peradilan Adat Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Diskusi Tentang Memperkuat Peradilan Adat Di Kalimantan Tengah Untuk Penguatan Akses Terhadap Keadilan, 2013.

Barda Nawawi Arief, S H. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Prenada Media, 2016.

Creswell, John W, and J David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications, 2017.

Denzin, Norman K, and Yvonna S Lincoln. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. sage, 2011.

Efendi, Jonaedi, Jhonny Ibrahim, and Prasetijo Rijadi. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris,” 2016.

Ehrlich, Eugene, and Klaus A Ziegert. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Routledge, 2017.

Faisal, Ahmad. “Pemikiran Hukum Progresif Prof. Dr. Satjipto Rahardjo.” Journal of Cross Knowledge 1, no. 2 (2023): 314–28.

Gosita, Arif. “Masalah Korban Kejahatan.” Buku Dosen-2009, 2010.

Kusumawardhani, Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas. “Hukum Pidana.” Yayasan DPI, 2024.

———. “Sistem Penegakan Hukum Nasional Sebagai Bingkai Putusan Pengadilan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum STHG 1, no. 1 (2018): 44–68.

Littlefield, Neil O. “Eugen Ehrlich’s Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law.” Me. L. Rev. 19 (1967): 1.

Mahfud, Moh. Politik Hukum Di Indonesia. Lp3s, 1998.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. “Penelitian Hukum,” 2013.

Nasional, Badan Pembinaan Hukum, Petunjuk Teknis, and I BAB. “Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.” Draft Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) 1, no. 1 (2015).

Nikolas, Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah, and Sumartini Dewi. “Dasar Konseptual Dan Implementasi Restorative Justice Oleh Polri Untuk Mewujudkan Tujuan Dan Fungsi Hukum (Kepastian, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4197–4203.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, and Biarkan Hukum Mengalir. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Dasar Pembangunan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia.” In Makalah Yang Disampaikan Pada Seminar Nasional Menggagas Ilmu Hukum Progresif Di Indonesia, Di Semarang, 2004.

Rochaeti, Nur. “Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 44, no. 2 (2015): 150–60.

Sidharta, B Arief. “Refleksi Tentang Fundasi Dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia= Reflection Concerning the Foundation and Scientific Character of the Legal Science as the Basis for Developing Indonesia’a National Legal s.” Universitas Padjajaran, 1996.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Hukum Adat Indonesia, 2005.

———. “Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,” 2007.

Supusesa, Reimon. “Eksistensi Hukum Delik Adat Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Maluku Tengah.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 24, no. 1 (2012): 41–54.

Susanto, Anthon F. Ilmu Hukum Non Sistematik (Fondasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia). LoGoz Publishing, 2015.

Tamanaha, Brian Z. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford Socio-Legal Studies, 2001.

Tanya, Bernard L, Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak, and Markus Y Hage. “Teori Hukum.” Genta Publishing, 2013.

Wiranata, I Gede A B, and M H Sh. Hukum Adat Indonesia Perkembangan Dari Masa Ke Masa. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.

Yahya, Muhammad, and Deli Bunga Saravistha. “Implikasi Restorative Justice Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang KUHP.” Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti 7, no. 2 (2024): 73–81.