Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka

Arios Valentino Taghupia; John Dirk Pasalbessy; Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa

doi:10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773

Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka

Arios Valentino Taghupia⁽¹⁾, John Dirk Pasalbessy⁽²⁾, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The pretrial examination only examines the validity of legal procedures in handling cases. The question which one should be the subject of a pretrial case examination, whether the examination of the procedure, or examination of the subject matter.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss of the essentially examination of pretrial cases an effort to fulfil one’s rights of the suspect according of the criminal procedure code, and Objectivity of pretrial case examination and its presence in the criminal procedure code in the future.

Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative legal research. The approach used in this research are the statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials are through literature study, and analysis of legal materials is qualitative.

Results of the Research: The pretrial examination mechanism which is essentially an effort to fulfil one's rights in its implementation is not so broad in the sense that the examination of cases that are substantial (material aspects) in the context of actual prove of a procedure law enforcement. To obtain a material truth, the judge in examining existing pretrial case, has not been able to explore the truth in assessing any evidence submitted by the applicant and the respondent in a pretrial case, which also means that in some pretrial case examinations, judge are still limited to pretrial examination, namely regarding the procedure as stipulated in article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Keywords

Pretrial; Suspect Rights; Protection of Human Rights

DOI

10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773

Published

2022-08-31

How To Cite

APA: Taghupia, A.V., Pasalbessy, J.D., & Hehanussa, D.J. (2022). Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 2(2), 96–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773.

IEEE: A.V. Taghupia, J.D. Pasalbessy, and D.J. Hehanussa, "Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka", Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 96–113, Aug. 2022. Accessed on: Jul. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773

Harvard: Taghupia, A.V., Pasalbessy, J.D., and Hehanussa, D.J., (2022). "Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka". PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, Volume 2(2), pp. 96–113. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773 (Accessed on: 27 July 2024)

Chicago: Taghupia, Arios Valentino, John Dirk Pasalbessy, and Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa. "Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 2, no. 2 (August 31, 2022): 96–113. Accessed July 27, 2024. doi:10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773

Vancouver: Taghupia AV, Pasalbessy JD, Hehanussa DJ. Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka. Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev. [Internet]. 2022 Aug 31 [cited 2024 Jul 27];2(2):96–113. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773

MLA 8th: Taghupia, Arios Valentino, John Dirk Pasalbessy, and Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa. "Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, vol. 2, no. 2, 31 Aug. 2022, pp. 96–113, doi:10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773. Accessed 27 Jul. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{pamali773,
		author = {Arios Taghupia and John Pasalbessy and Deassy Hehanussa},
		title = {Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka},
		journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review},
		volume = {2},
		number = {2},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Pretrial; Suspect Rights; Protection of Human Rights},
		abstract = {Introduction: The pretrial examination only examines the validity of legal procedures in handling cases. The question which one should be the subject of a pretrial case examination, whether the examination of the procedure, or examination of the subject matter.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss of the essentially examination of pretrial cases an effort to fulfil one’s rights of the suspect according of the criminal procedure code, and Objectivity of pretrial case examination and its presence in the criminal procedure code in the future.Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative legal research. The approach used in this research are the statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials are through literature study, and analysis of legal materials is qualitative.Results of the Research: The pretrial examination mechanism which is essentially an effort to fulfil one's rights in its implementation is not so broad in the sense that the examination of cases that are substantial (material aspects) in the context of actual prove of a procedure law enforcement. To obtain a material truth, the judge in examining existing pretrial case, has not been able to explore the truth in assessing any evidence submitted by the applicant and the respondent in a pretrial case, which also means that in some pretrial case examinations, judge are still limited to pretrial examination, namely regarding the procedure as stipulated in article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code.},
				issn = {2775-5649},		pages = {96--113}			doi = {10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/773}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Afandi, Fachrizal. “Perbandingan Praktik Praperadilan dan Pembentukan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Dalam Peradilan Pidana Indonesia”, Mimbar Hukum 28, no. 1, (2016): 93-106. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/15868/10477. Ariyanti, Vivi. “Kebebasan Hakim dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Menangani Perkara Pidana di Indonesia”, Mahkamah 4, no. 2, (2019): 162-74. https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/ mahkamah/article/view/5374/2477. Ginting, Miko Susanto. “Evaluasi Terhadap Pembahasan RKUHAP: Mengapa Pemerintah dan DPR Tidak Berhasil Membahas RKUHAP?”, Teropong 3, (2015): 31-44. http://mappifhui.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/10/JPer-Final-29-Jun.pdf. Hamzah, Andi and R. M. Surachman, Pre-Trial Justice & Discretionary Justice: Dalam KUHAP Berbagai Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015. Kaligis, O. C. Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Asasi Tersangka, Terdakwa dan Terpidana, Bandung: Alumni, 2006. ------, et al., Praktek Praperadilan Dari Waktu ke Waktu, Jakarta: Otto Cornelis Kaligis & Associates, 2000. Maggalatung, A. Salman. “Hubungan Antara Fakta, Norma, Moral, dan Doktrin Hukum Dalam Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim”, Cita Hukum II, no. 2, (2014): 185-92. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum/article/view/1462/pdf. Manan, Abdul. Dinamika Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana, 2018. Margono, Asas Keadilan, Kemanfaatan dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Putusan Hakim, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019. Muhaimin, “Keberadaan Hakim Komisaris dan Transparansi Dalam Proses Penyidikan”, De Jure 16, no. 2, (2016): 215-30. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/57/9. Muntaha, “Pengaturan Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia”, Mimbar Hukum 29, no. 23, (2017): 463-72. http://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.22318. Rahim, Arhjayati. “Praperadilan Sebagai Kontrol Profesionalisme Kinerja Penyidik”, Pelangi Ilmu 5, no. 1, (2012): 87-94. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/901. Reksodiputro, Mardjono. “Menggugat Praperadilan ‘Sarpin Effect’ Merupakan ‘Malapetaka’ Reformasi Peradilan di Indonesia?”, Teropong 3, (2015): 1-12. http://mappifhui.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/JPer-Final-29-Jun.pdf. Rumadan, Ismail. “Peran Lembaga Peradilan Sebagai Institusi Penegak Hukum Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Bagi Terwujudnya Perdamaian”, Rectsvinding 6, no. 1, (2017): 69-87. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/128/131. Seno Adji, Indriyanto. “Hakim Komisaris: Solusi ke Arah Prinsip Keadilan”, Hukum & Pembangunan 32, no. 3, (2002): 251-70. http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/1344/1266. Sudrajat Tedi, and Endra Wijaya, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020. Susilo, Erwin. Permasalahan Praperadilan, Ganti Rugi dan/atau Rehabilitasi Ditinjau Dari Segi Teori, Norma dan Praktik, Bandung: Alumni, 2020. Tornado, Anang Shophan. Praperadilan: Sarana Perlindungan Tersangka Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Nusa Media, 2018. ------. “Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Prinsip Keadilan”, Al’Adl 10, no. 2, (2018): 237-52. https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/aldli/article/view/1366/1151. ------. Reformasi Praperadilan di Indonesia, Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019. Wahyuningsih, Sri Endah. “Urgensi Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Materiel Indonesia Berdasarkan Nilai- Nilai Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa”, Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 1, (2014): 17-23. http://lppm- unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/1457/1128. Witanto, D. Y. Hukum Acara Praperadilan Dalam Teori dan Praktik: Mengurai Konflik Norma dan Kekeliruan Dalam Praktik Penanganan Perkara Praperadilan, Jakarta: Imaji Cipta Karya, 2019.

Full Text: PDF