Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah

Ricardo Marlon Mauwa(1email), Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua(2), Jemmy Jeffry Pietersz(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: The Ministerial decree of Home Affairs (beleidsregels) in the Authority of Annulment provincial regulations is a form of modification of administrative law in preparing regional regulatory norms and has a hierarchical basis for the formation of provincial regulations.

Purposes of the Research:  Reviewing and analyzing the suitability of legal norms instruments against the hierarchical laws and regulations within the authority to annulment provincial regulations by the Minister of Home Affairs, so that the instrument of authority in the context of central and regional relations should be a source of positive law based on the authority of state institutions (authority of the Minister of Home Affairs).

Methods of the Research: This research is a case study using a normative juridical method with a case approach that is discussed descriptively, namely examining legal reasons (ratio decidendi) legitimacy and the basis for the authority of the Minister of Home Affairs in annulment Provincial Regulations and reviewing the authority of central relations and regions as indicators of government authority (Cq. Minister of Home Affairs) in the context to harmonize the implementation of public interest (administrative function = bestuurs function).

Results of the Research: Modification of administrative law in practice of the authority to annulment provincial regional regulations by the Minister of Home Affairs in connection with central and regional relations in normative legal research on the laws and regulations applied in the Constitutional Court Decision No. Register: 137/PUU-XIII/2015; judicial review Article 251: (2),(3),(4),(8) and the Constitutional Court Decision No. Register: 56/PUU-XIV/2016; judicial review Article 251 : (1),(4),(5),(7), "as long as the phrase the authority to repeal provincial regional regulations by the Minister of Home Affairs is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and has no binding legal force". This creates confusion and dualism from the analogy principle by design : (1). Control of the administrative mechanism/ administrative function based on the normative formulation of Law Number 23 of 2014 the relevance of Permendagri Number 80 of 2015 (as the principal authority of the Minister of Home Affairs) is "a priore" in the practice of HTN is called as the authority of state institutions in an administrative appeal; and (2). Control of the juridical/judicial function mechanism, namely the legal authority to test according to the conception/hierarchy of laws and regulations based on the normative formulation of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the relevance of Presidential Regulation Number 87 of 2014 (which is the authority of the Supreme Court in the toetsingrehct/judicial mechanism review) is having the quality of “a posterore” on the other hand.


Keywords


Law Norm Instruments; Annulment of Authority Provincial Regulation; Central And Regional Relationship


DOI


10.47268/pamali.v2i2.885

Published


2022-08-31

How To Cite


APA: Mauwa, R.M., Nirahua, S.E., & Pietersz, J.J. (2022). Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 2(2), 172–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.885.
IEEE: R.M. Mauwa, S.E. Nirahua, and J.J. Pietersz, "Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah", Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 172–199, Aug. 2022. Accessed on: Dec. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.885
Harvard: Mauwa, R.M., Nirahua, S.E., and Pietersz, J.J., (2022). "Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah". PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, Volume 2(2), pp. 172–199. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.885 (Accessed on: 22 December 2024)
Chicago: Mauwa, Ricardo Marlon, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua, and Jemmy Jeffry Pietersz. "Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 2, no. 2 (August 31, 2022): 172–199. Accessed December 22, 2024. doi:10.47268/pamali.v2i2.885
Vancouver: Mauwa RM, Nirahua SE, Pietersz JJ. Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah. Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev. [Internet]. 2022 Aug 31 [cited 2024 Dec 22];2(2):172–199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.885
MLA 8th: Mauwa, Ricardo Marlon, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua, and Jemmy Jeffry Pietersz. "Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, vol. 2, no. 2, 31 Aug. 2022, pp. 172–199, doi:10.47268/pamali.v2i2.885. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{pamali885,
		author = {Ricardo Mauwa and Salmon Nirahua and Jemmy Pietersz},
		title = {Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah},
		journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review},
		volume = {2},
		number = {2},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Law Norm Instruments; Annulment of Authority Provincial Regulation; Central And Regional Relationship},
		abstract = {Introduction: The Ministerial decree of Home Affairs (beleidsregels) in the Authority of Annulment provincial regulations is a form of modification of administrative law in preparing regional regulatory norms and has a hierarchical basis for the formation of provincial regulations.Purposes of the Research:  Reviewing and analyzing the suitability of legal norms instruments against the hierarchical laws and regulations within the authority to annulment provincial regulations by the Minister of Home Affairs, so that the instrument of authority in the context of central and regional relations should be a source of positive law based on the authority of state institutions (authority of the Minister of Home Affairs).Methods of the Research: This research is a case study using a normative juridical method with a case approach that is discussed descriptively, namely examining legal reasons (ratio decidendi) legitimacy and the basis for the authority of the Minister of Home Affairs in annulment Provincial Regulations and reviewing the authority of central relations and regions as indicators of government authority (Cq. Minister of Home Affairs) in the context to harmonize the implementation of public interest (administrative function = bestuurs function).Results of the Research: Modification of administrative law in practice of the authority to annulment provincial regional regulations by the Minister of Home Affairs in connection with central and regional relations in normative legal research on the laws and regulations applied in the Constitutional Court Decision No. Register: 137/PUU-XIII/2015; judicial review Article 251: (2),(3),(4),(8) and the Constitutional Court Decision No. Register: 56/PUU-XIV/2016; judicial review Article 251 : (1),(4),(5),(7), "as long as the phrase the authority to repeal provincial regional regulations by the Minister of Home Affairs is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and has no binding legal force". This creates confusion and dualism from the analogy principle by design : (1). Control of the administrative mechanism/ administrative function based on the normative formulation of Law Number 23 of 2014 the relevance of Permendagri Number 80 of 2015 (as the principal authority of the Minister of Home Affairs) is "a priore" in the practice of HTN is called as the authority of state institutions in an administrative appeal; and (2). Control of the juridical/judicial function mechanism, namely the legal authority to test according to the conception/hierarchy of laws and regulations based on the normative formulation of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the relevance of Presidential Regulation Number 87 of 2014 (which is the authority of the Supreme Court in the toetsingrehct/judicial mechanism review) is having the quality of “a posterore” on the other hand.},
				issn = {2775-5649},		pages = {172--199}			doi = {10.47268/pamali.v2i2.885},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/885}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Amirudin, H. Zainal Azikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian hukum. Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persoda, 2006. Hexter, J.H. Thomas Hobbes and the law. Volume 65, Cornell Law Review 471 (1980), Available at: Article1. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol65/iss4/1 Manan, Bagir. Hubungan Antara Pusat dan Daerah Menurut UUD 1945. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1994. Manan, Bagir. Peningkatan Fungsi Kontrol Masyarakat Terhadap Lembaga Legislatif, Eksekutif dan Yudikatif. Makalah pada forum Orientasi dan Tatap Muka Tingkat Nasional Kosgoro, Cipanas-Cianjur, 26 Juli 2000. Sunggono, Bambang. Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1997. Sihombing, Eka NAM. PERKEMBANGAN KEWENANGAN PEMBATALAN PERATURAN DAERAH DAN PERATURAN KEPALA DAERAH Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 Dan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016. 2017; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. Hadjon, P. M. (1997). Pengkajian Ilmu Hukum. Makalah Pelatihan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum – Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Airlangga bekerjsama dengan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga. Balck, Henry Campbell, Op.Cit, p. 229; dalam Jemmy Jeffry Pietersz. Pengujian Dalam Penggunaan Kewenangan Pemerintahan. Karya Ilmiah Disertasi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 2016. Hutchinson, T. (2002). Researching and Writing in Law. Lawbook Co. Fachruddin, Irfan. Pengawasan Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah. Alumni, Bandung, 2004. Pietersz, Jemmy Jeffry. Pengujian Dalam Penggunaan Kewenangan Pemerintahan. Karya Ilmiah Disertasi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 2016. Pieterz, Jemmy Jeffry. S.E.M. Nirahua. Argumentasi Hukum Pada Ujian Tesis: “Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah”. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, 2022. Pieterz, Jemmy Jeffry. Materi Perkuliahan Hukum Administrasi Wilayah Kepulauan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, 2008. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. HUKUM TATA NEGARA DAN PILAR-PILAR DEMOKRASI Serpihan Pemikiran Hukum, Media dan HAM. Jakarta, Jakarta Barat, Konstitusi Press dengan PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2005. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Diterbitkan atas kerjasama Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Pusat Studi HTN FH Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2004. S. Indrati, Maria Farida. ILMU PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan., Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, PT. Kanisius (Anggota IKAPI), 2007. Muchsan. Sistem Pengawasan Terhadap Perbuatan Aparat Pemerintah dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1992. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, Kencana, 2008. Risalah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 56/PUU-XIV/2016 tanggal 21 Juli 2016 Risalah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 137/PUU-XIII/2015 tanggal 11 November 2015 Andreae, S.J. Fockema. Rechtsgeleerd Handwoordenboek. Tweede Druk, J.B. Wolter’Uitgevers-maatshappij N.V., Groningen, 1951. Soejono, H. Abdurrahman. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta, 2003. Syarifuddin. Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Mengadili Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta, Kencana, Cetakan Pertama 2020. Thomas Hobbes. Dari Anarki Ke Hierarki: Eksposisi Gagasan Thomas Hobbes sebagai Rujukan Teori Realisme. Jurnal Hukum, https://ejournal.fisip.unjani.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-dinamika-global/article/download/796/275. Sedubun, Victor Juzuf. Marthinus Johanes Saptenno. Jemmy Jeffry Pietersz. Sostones Yacobis Sisinaru., “Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah dan Akibat Hukumnya Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah”, SASI 25, No. 2 (2019): 109,https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i2.216 Yuswanto. M. Yasin Al Arif. Diskursus Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Putusan MK Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Hukum, 2018. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1542. Zaka Firma Aditya dan M. Reza Winata, “Rekonstruksi Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia”, NEGARA HUKUM: Vol. 9, No. 1, Juni 2018.https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/976.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 857 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 620 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Marlon Mauwa, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua, Jemmy Jeffry Pietersz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.