A Comparative Study of Fair Online Buying and Selling Regulations: A Legal Comparison Between Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore
)
(1) Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada, Pare-Pare, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The practice of buying and selling online is part of the development of digitalization and technology. Regulation of fair online buying and selling practices by the state is important to protect the rights of the parties.
Purpose of the Research: This research aims to analyze and compare online buying and selling arrangements implemented in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.
Method of Research: Normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual, statutory and conceptual approaches.
Results of Research: Regulation of online buying and selling in Indonesia is viewed from the aspect of distributive justice because the practice of equal playing field, namely equalizing business actors from abroad and from within the country, has not been accompanied by empowerment efforts and special treatment for small, micro and medium businesses in Indonesia, despite its commutative justice aspect, has accommodated various efforts to protect sellers and buyers in online buying and selling transactions. Comparison of the legal regulations for online buying and selling between Indonesia and Malaysia and Singapore. In general, Malaysia and Singapore have provided special arrangements and appropriate and fast procedures regarding means of complaints and the process for complaints in online buying and selling transactions is carried out comprehensively to ensure that everyone or parties involved in online buying and selling transactions have their complaints heard and followed up. Therefore, Indonesia needs to improve regulations related to online buying and selling transactions, especially regarding optimizing complaint services as implemented in Malaysia and Singapore, which follow up on complaint services within a certain period of time and are processed to provide legal certainty and protection for the parties involved in the transaction. online buying and selling transactions.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v30i2.2021
Published
2024-06-28
How To Cite
@article{SASI2021,
author = {Muhammad Rahman},
title = {A Comparative Study of Fair Online Buying and Selling Regulations: A Legal Comparison Between Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {30},
number = {2},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Buying and Selling; Online Legal Comparison.},
abstract = {Introduction: The practice of buying and selling online is part of the development of digitalization and technology. Regulation of fair online buying and selling practices by the state is important to protect the rights of the parties.Purpose of the Research: This research aims to analyze and compare online buying and selling arrangements implemented in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.Method of Research: Normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual, statutory and conceptual approaches.Results of Research: Regulation of online buying and selling in Indonesia is viewed from the aspect of distributive justice because the practice of equal playing field, namely equalizing business actors from abroad and from within the country, has not been accompanied by empowerment efforts and special treatment for small, micro and medium businesses in Indonesia, despite its commutative justice aspect, has accommodated various efforts to protect sellers and buyers in online buying and selling transactions. Comparison of the legal regulations for online buying and selling between Indonesia and Malaysia and Singapore. In general, Malaysia and Singapore have provided special arrangements and appropriate and fast procedures regarding means of complaints and the process for complaints in online buying and selling transactions is carried out comprehensively to ensure that everyone or parties involved in online buying and selling transactions have their complaints heard and followed up. Therefore, Indonesia needs to improve regulations related to online buying and selling transactions, especially regarding optimizing complaint services as implemented in Malaysia and Singapore, which follow up on complaint services within a certain period of time and are processed to provide legal certainty and protection for the parties involved in the transaction. online buying and selling transactions.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {157--168} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v30i2.2021},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/2021}
}
Journal Article
Alnsour, Ibrahim Radwan, Mohammad Yousef Alghadi, Ahmad Bani Ahmad, Mohammad Haider Alibraheem, Said Mohamad Altahat, Raed Walid Al-Smadi, and Khaled Y. Alshboul. “Islamic Financial Technology Acceptance: An Empirical Study in Jordan.” International Journal of Data and Network Science 7, no. 4 (2023): 1659–68. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.7.023.
Apriliani, Intan Nur, Nadya Salsabila, and Putri Regina Wijaya. “Problematika Implementasi Khiyar Dalam Jual Beli Online.” Shar-E : Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah 9, no. 1 (2023): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.37567/shar-e.v9i1.1539.
Chotim, Endah Ratnawaty. “Talcott Parsons’ Sociological Perspective In Viewing Social Change In Society In The New Normal Era.” Ijd-Demos 4, no. 1 (2022): 607–17. https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i1.238.
Cruz, Carolina da. “Legal Aspects Of Justice In Criminal Law Enforcement.” Pembaharuan Hukum 6, no. 3 (2019): 398.
Dian Humairoh, Iftitah, Mia Rosmiawati, Jalan Kalimantan No, Krajan Timur, Kec Sumbersari, Kabupaten Jember, and Jawa Timur. “Problematika Normatif Dalam Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 31 Tahun 2023 Terkait Larangan Social-Commerce Pada Tiktok Shop.” Jurnal Crepido 05, no. November (2023): 184–95.
Elida Saragih, Fauziah Nur, Hendra Alsa Fahmi, Ali Imran Sinaga. “Bisnis Jual Beli Online (Online Shop) Dalam Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 1 (2024): 3100–3104. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v3i01.99.
Hari Sutra Disemadi. “Lensa Penelitian Hukum : Esai Deskriptif Tentang Metodologi Penelitian Hukum.” Journal of Judicial Review 24, no. 2 (2022): 289–304. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/.
Harun, Muhammad. “Philosophical Study of Hans Kelsen ’ s Thoughts on Law and Satjipto Rahardjo ’ s Ideas on Progressive Law.” Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) 1, no. 2 (2019): 195–220. https://doi.org/10.21580/Walrev/2019.1.2.4815.
Hefny, Mohamed Hamed Mohamed, Yehia Helmy, and Mohamed Abdelsalam. “Open Banking API Framework to Improve the Online Transaction between Local Banks in Egypt Using Blockchain Technology.” Journal of Advances in Information Technology 14, no. 4 (2023): 729–40. https://doi.org/10.12720/jait.14.4.729-740.
Koos, Stefan. “Digital Globalization and Law.” Lex Scientia Law Review 6, no. 1 (2022): 33–68. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.55092.
Kristiyant, Celina Tri Siwi. “Fulfillment Of Good Faith Principle In Preparation Of Standard Clauses.” Notariil 4, no. 2 (2019): 114–22.
Lee, Cassey. “Strategic Policies for Digital Economic Transformation: The Case of Malaysia.” Journal of Southeast Asian Economies 40, no. 1 (2023): 32–63. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae40-1c.
Lin, Lin. “Regulating FinTech: The Case of Singapore.” SSRN Electronic Journal 1, no. 1 (2019): 94–98. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3481563.
Makhtar, Maheran, and Farhanin Abdullah Asuhaimi. “Regulatory Framework for Online Businesses in Malaysia.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 9, no. 3 (2019): 427–38. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i3/5703.
Milik, Piotr, and Grzegorz Pilarski. “Cyberattacks and the Bank ’ s Liability for Unauthorized Payment Transactions in the Online Banking System – Theory and Practice.” Cybersecurity and Law 1, no. 9 (2023): 109–12.
Mofea, Sukhebi, and Beggy Tamara. “Juridical Analysis of Electronic Transaction Information Crime Against Gambling.” The International Journal of Review and State Administration 1, no. 1 (2023): 30–38.
Mutiara, Upik, Rahmad Ramadhan Hasibuan, and Lupita Risma Candanni. “Perlindungan Data Dalam Layanan Perbankan Berbasis Teknologi (Fintech): Kerangka Regulasi Di Indonesia Dan Singapura.” Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2021): 1. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v5i2.788.
Putri, Allya Maulida, and Hardian Iskandar. “Legal Protection Of International Business Transactions On Electronic Commerce (Ecommerce) Transaction Contracts.” Jurnal Justiciabelen 6, no. 1 (2023): 36. https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v6i1.6168.
Safira Widya Attidhira, and Yana Sukma Permana. “Review of Personal Data Protection Legal Regulations in Indonesia.” Awang Long Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 280–94. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i1.562.
Saleh, Gazalba Saleh, and Gazalba Saleh Saleh. “Juridical Analysis of the Crime of Online Store Fraud in Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 11, no. 1 (2022): 151. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.1.2022.151-175.
Sharma, Rahul. “Legal Challenges and Enforcement Mechanisms in India ’ s Contract Act , 1872 for E-Commerce Transactions.” Eduzone 12, no. 2 (2023): 236–43.
Siregar, Ahmad Munawir, Hamdan Azhar Siregar, Siti Miskiah, and Nino Agung Perdana. “Validity of Online Transaction Agreements in the Digital Era.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on “Changing of Law: Business Law, Local Wisdom and Tourism Industry", 804:56–64, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-180-7_8.
Situmorang, Mosgan. “Measuring The Effectiveess of Consumer Dispute Resolution on Small Value E-Commerce Transaction.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 22, no. 4 (2022): 537. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.v22.537-550.
Subagyono, Bambang Sugeng Ariadi, Sri Astutik, Zahry Vandawati Chumaida, Mochamad Kevin Romadhona, and Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti. Consumer Dispute in Electronic Transactions: State Obligation and Dispute Settlement Under Indonesia Consumer Protection Law. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. Vol. 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1240.
Sudarwanto, Al Sentot, and Dona Budi Budi Kharisma. “Comparative Study of Personal Data Protection Regulations in Indonesia, Hong Kong and Malaysia.” Journal of Financial Crime 10 (2021): 431–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2021-0193.
Sunaryo, Sunaryo. “Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik Dan Relevansinya.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 1 (2022): 001. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1911.
Tan, Seow Hon. “Radbruch’s Formula Revisited: The Lex Injusta Non Est Lex Maxim in Constitutional Democracies.” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 34, no. 2 (2021): 472.
Widjaja, Abdi, Achmad Musyahid Idrus, Tahani Asri Maulidah, Mulham Jaki Asti, and Nurjannah. “The Implementation of E-Commerce Consumer Option Rights (Khiyar) in Realizing Transaction Justice: A Study of Maqasid Al-Shariah.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 17, no. 1 (2023): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i1.7673.
Zhumadilova, Mira A., Yerkin Sh Dussipov, Gulnar I. Arginbekova, Bolat Zh Aitimov, and Yelena V. Milova. “Civil Legal Handling of Electronic Transactions: The Essence and Modern Realities.” Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes 15, no. 1 (2023): 160–76. https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v15i1.43829.
Book
Susskind, Richard. The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Thesis, Online/World Wide Web and Others
Kominfo. “Peraturan Pemerintah Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik (PMSE).” aptika.kominfo.go.id, 2020. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2020/01/peraturan-pemerintah-nomor-80-tahun-2019-tentang-perdagangan-melalui-sistem-elektronik-pmse/.
Sunartono. “Tren Ekonomi Digital 2024: E-Commerce Masih Merajai, 64 Persen Masyarakat Bayar Nontunai,” 2024. https://ekbis.harianjogja.com/read/2023/12/08/502/1157504/tren-ekonomi-digital-2024-e-commerce-masih-merajai-64-persen-masyarakat-bayar-nontunai.
WANTIKNAS. “Arah Transformasi Digital Indonesia,” 2024. http://www.wantiknas.go.id/id/berita/arah-transformasi-digital-indonesia.
: 11 times
Download : 6 times
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Sabir Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
