Praktik Eksekusi Riil Tanah Milik Masyarakat Adat Sunda Wiwitan

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia

(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract
At the time of the riil execution, it was not uncommon to encounter obstacles which caused the execution to not be carried out. One of them is the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 2394 K/Pdt/2010. Therefore the researcher wants to examine the things that cause riil execution cannot be carried out in terms of civil procedural law and what legal actions can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out in connection with a civil law. The research method used is a normative juridical,analytical methods used in the data are qualitative normative. Based on the research, it can be concluded that what caused the riil execution of the Supreme Court's Decision Number 2394 K/PDT/2010 on 12 January 2012 could not be implemented because of the resistance carried out by the parties executed and third parties carried out by the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people by carrying out physical resistance which caused casualties to the execution, resistance efforts are carried out to obstruct the process of execution and Legal actions that can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out that is by way of the applicant's execution can submit a request for execution again to the Chairperson of the Kuningan District Court to carry out the second execution.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v26i3.285
Published
2020-09-21
How To Cite
@article{SASI285, author = {Hazar Kusmayanti and Sandi Hawari}, title = {Praktik Eksekusi Riil Tanah Milik Masyarakat Adat Sunda Wiwitan}, journal = {SASI}, volume = {26}, number = {3}, year = {2020}, keywords = {Real Execution; Land; Custom Society}, abstract = {At the time of the riil execution, it was not uncommon to encounter obstacles which caused the execution to not be carried out. One of them is the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 2394 K/Pdt/2010. Therefore the researcher wants to examine the things that cause riil execution cannot be carried out in terms of civil procedural law and what legal actions can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out in connection with a civil law. The research method used is a normative juridical,analytical methods used in the data are qualitative normative. Based on the research, it can be concluded that what caused the riil execution of the Supreme Court's Decision Number 2394 K/PDT/2010 on 12 January 2012 could not be implemented because of the resistance carried out by the parties executed and third parties carried out by the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people by carrying out physical resistance which caused casualties to the execution, resistance efforts are carried out to obstruct the process of execution and Legal actions that can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out that is by way of the applicant's execution can submit a request for execution again to the Chairperson of the Kuningan District Court to carry out the second execution.}, issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {341--355} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i3.285}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/285} }
[1] Basuki Prasetyo.A, (2019). "Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Masyarakat Adat Karuhun Urang (AKUR) Di Desa Cigugur Kuningan Melalui Lembaga Peradilan", Law, Development & Justice Review, Vol 2 (1).
https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v2i1.5003
[2] Hipan N, (2018) "Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Di Lokasi Tanjung Sari Kabupaten Banggai", Jurnal Law Reform, 14 (2).
https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i2.20870
[3] Farakhiyah R, Irfan M, (2019), "Eksistensi Masyarakat Adat Tergerus Oleh Kebutuhan Zaman", Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 1, (1)
https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v1i1.20892
[4] Jumaidah Aulia N, (2016) "Eksekusi Riil Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Telah Mempunyai Kekuatan Tetap Pada Perkara Perdata No.20/P.dt.G/2011/PN.Pbr Di PN Kelas IA Pekan Baru", JOM Fakultas Hukum, III (2).
[5] Latifiani : "Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Putusan Hakim", (2015) JHAPER: 1(1). Kusmayanti H, Sandra. E, dan Novianti. R, (2015), "Sidang Keliling dan Prinsip-prinsip HukumAcara Perdata: Studi Pengamatan Sidang Keliling di Pengadilan Agama Tasikmalaya", JHAPER, 1, (2)
[6] Kusmayanti, H. (2016). "Penerapan dan Permasalahan Eksekusi Pesawat Terbang Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Perjanjian Perawatan Mesin Pesawat". Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol. (1).
https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v1n1.3
[7] Rahmawati, R, (2019). "Eksekusi Aset Debitor yang Berada Di Luar Negeri dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan", SASI. 25 (2) : 121-132, DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i2.217
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i2.217
[8] Suyatno. A, (2014) "Perlawanan Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Titel Eksetorial", Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 3 (1).
https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.3.1.2014.1-10
[9] Wahyu Wikanto.A, Yudowibowo. S, Harjono, (2014) "Eksekusi Riil Dalam Perkara Perdata Tentang Pengosongan Tanah Dan Bangunan Rumah", Jurnal Verstek, 2 (2).
[10] Khaidir Muhammad. A, (1992) Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, cetakan V, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti,
[11] Yahya Harahap.M, (1997), Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bandung: Citra Abadi.
[12] Soeroso,(2010) Hukum Acara Perdata lengkap dan praktis HIR,RBg dan Yurisprudensi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[13] Sarwono, (2016) Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[14] Sutantio R, Oeripkartawinata I, (2009), Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
[15] Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, (2006) Yogyakarta: Liberty
Cited-By:
1. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Beritikad Baik yang Dirugikan Atas Penetapan Eksekusi Berdasarkan Akta Perdamaian
Fiona Theresia, Lanny Kusumawati, Erly Aristo
Notaire vol: 5 issue: 2 first page: 235 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat pada Kawasan Hutan
Adonia Ivonne Laturette
SASI vol: 27 issue: 1 first page: 102 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Praktik Eksekusi Riil Tanah Milik Masyarakat Adat Sunda Wiwitan |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Hazar Kusmayanti; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung; Indonesia ![]() |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Sandi Yusta Hawari; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Real Execution; Land; Custom Society |
4. | Description | Abstract | At the time of the riil execution, it was not uncommon to encounter obstacles which caused the execution to not be carried out. One of them is the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 2394 K/Pdt/2010. Therefore the researcher wants to examine the things that cause riil execution cannot be carried out in terms of civil procedural law and what legal actions can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out in connection with a civil law. The research method used is a normative juridical,analytical methods used in the data are qualitative normative. Based on the research, it can be concluded that what caused the riil execution of the Supreme Court's Decision Number 2394 K/PDT/2010 on 12 January 2012 could not be implemented because of the resistance carried out by the parties executed and third parties carried out by the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people by carrying out physical resistance which caused casualties to the execution, resistance efforts are carried out to obstruct the process of execution and Legal actions that can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out that is by way of the applicant's execution can submit a request for execution again to the Chairperson of the Kuningan District Court to carry out the second execution. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2020-09-21 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/285 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v26i3.285 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Vol 26, No 3 (2020): Volume 26 Nomor 3, Juli - September 2020 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2020 Hazar Kusmayanti, Sandi Yusta Hawari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Beritikad Baik yang Dirugikan Atas Penetapan Eksekusi Berdasarkan Akta Perdamaian
Fiona Theresia, Lanny Kusumawati, Erly Aristo
Notaire vol: 5 issue: 2 first page: 235 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat pada Kawasan Hutan
Adonia Ivonne Laturette
SASI vol: 27 issue: 1 first page: 102 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]