KEABSAHAN KETERANGAN AHLI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Proof needed to convince the judge that there has been a criminal offense, after HIR to the Code of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Procedure Code) was added Specification Expert as a form of evidence, in the Corruption MCK Ambon City in 2012, the Prosecutor requested an expert witness of the National Association of Indonesian Consultants (NAIC) Mollucas, to perform calculations MCK building construction Ambon, at the hearing the expert testimony submitted evidently not in accordance with skills, whereas in providing expert testimony at both the investigation and the court should have the skills to enter. The results showed that specification experts given for criminal acts that occure and seek state losses in the corruption of Crime MCK Ambon City, but it turns out experts who testified in the investigation process does not have a certification as a construction expert, and he was not breathing sworn. In the process of the corruption court, the public prosecutor can not bring experts from NAIC Mollucas, and testimony just recited, this shows that the expert testimony can not be used or invalid
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v20i1.340
Published
2014-06-30
How To Cite
@article{SASI340,
author = {Erwin Ubwarin},
title = {KEABSAHAN KETERANGAN AHLI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {20},
number = {1},
year = {2014},
keywords = {Expert testimony; Corruption},
abstract = {Proof needed to convince the judge that there has been a criminal offense, after HIR to the Code of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Procedure Code) was added Specification Expert as a form of evidence, in the Corruption MCK Ambon City in 2012, the Prosecutor requested an expert witness of the National Association of Indonesian Consultants (NAIC) Mollucas, to perform calculations MCK building construction Ambon, at the hearing the expert testimony submitted evidently not in accordance with skills, whereas in providing expert testimony at both the investigation and the court should have the skills to enter. The results showed that specification experts given for criminal acts that occure and seek state losses in the corruption of Crime MCK Ambon City, but it turns out experts who testified in the investigation process does not have a certification as a construction expert, and he was not breathing sworn. In the process of the corruption court, the public prosecutor can not bring experts from NAIC Mollucas, and testimony just recited, this shows that the expert testimony can not be used or invalid},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {1--7} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v20i1.340},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/340}
}
: 1470 times
Download : 9153 times
Cited-By:
1. Pertangungjawaban Pidana Tim Anggaran Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Penetapan RKA-SKPD Yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Negara
Weldy Vienando Lopulisa, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Erwin Ubwarin
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum vol: 3 issue: 2 first page: 184 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]
Copyright (c) 2014 Erwin Ubwarin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Pertangungjawaban Pidana Tim Anggaran Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Penetapan RKA-SKPD Yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Negara
Weldy Vienando Lopulisa, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Erwin Ubwarin
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum vol: 3 issue: 2 first page: 184 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]
Email this article 
