The Interplay of Customary Law and Labor Regulations: A Comparative Legal Pluralism Study in Indonesia and Algeria
), Kunarto Kunarto(2), Bakhouya Driss(3)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
(3) Faculty Law and Political Sciences, University of Adrar, Adrar, Algeria
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: This study examines the interaction between customary law and national labor regulations in Indonesia and Algeria through the lens of legal pluralism. The research is motivated by the persistent coexistence of formal state law and traditional practices in shaping employment relations, which is particularly evident in societies with strong communal and religious traditions. Both Indonesia and Algeria represent cases where historical legacies of colonialism, post-independence political choices, and enduring social structures have produced distinctive forms of legal pluralism in labor relations.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to compare how legal pluralism operates in the two countries to regulate employment relations, resolve labor disputes, and accommodate customary norms within national frameworks.
Methods of the Research: This study applies a normative legal research method with a comparative legal approach. Primary data sources include statutory regulations such as the Indonesian Labour Law Number 13 of 2003 (as amended by the Job Creation Law 2020 and Law Number 6 of 2023) and the Algerian Labour Code (Law Number 90-11/1990), while secondary data are drawn from academic literature, case studies, and reports from international institutions like the ILO. Data were analyzed using a descriptive-comparative technique to identify similarities, differences, and integration patterns between customary law and national labor regulations.
Results of the Research: The findings reveal that both Indonesia and Algeria institutionalize pluralism by formally recognizing certain customary practices, such as oral employment agreements in Algeria and community-based contractual practices in Indonesia. This novelty lies in demonstrating how pluralism is not merely a social phenomenon but also a legally recognized mechanism for regulating labor relations and dispute resolution. This study advances existing knowledge by showing that legal pluralism provides a flexible and context-sensitive framework for labor law, balancing global standards with local legitimacy.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3483
Published
2026-03-24
How To Cite
@article{SASI3483,
author = {Mahmuda Febriharini and Kunarto Kunarto and Bakhouya Driss},
title = {The Interplay of Customary Law and Labor Regulations: A Comparative Legal Pluralism Study in Indonesia and Algeria},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {32},
number = {1},
year = {2026},
keywords = {Legal Pluralism; Customary Law; Labor Regulation; Employment Relations.},
abstract = {Introduction: This study examines the interaction between customary law and national labor regulations in Indonesia and Algeria through the lens of legal pluralism. The research is motivated by the persistent coexistence of formal state law and traditional practices in shaping employment relations, which is particularly evident in societies with strong communal and religious traditions. Both Indonesia and Algeria represent cases where historical legacies of colonialism, post-independence political choices, and enduring social structures have produced distinctive forms of legal pluralism in labor relations.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to compare how legal pluralism operates in the two countries to regulate employment relations, resolve labor disputes, and accommodate customary norms within national frameworks.Methods of the Research: This study applies a normative legal research method with a comparative legal approach. Primary data sources include statutory regulations such as the Indonesian Labour Law Number 13 of 2003 (as amended by the Job Creation Law 2020 and Law Number 6 of 2023) and the Algerian Labour Code (Law Number 90-11/1990), while secondary data are drawn from academic literature, case studies, and reports from international institutions like the ILO. Data were analyzed using a descriptive-comparative technique to identify similarities, differences, and integration patterns between customary law and national labor regulations.Results of the Research: The findings reveal that both Indonesia and Algeria institutionalize pluralism by formally recognizing certain customary practices, such as oral employment agreements in Algeria and community-based contractual practices in Indonesia. This novelty lies in demonstrating how pluralism is not merely a social phenomenon but also a legally recognized mechanism for regulating labor relations and dispute resolution. This study advances existing knowledge by showing that legal pluralism provides a flexible and context-sensitive framework for labor law, balancing global standards with local legitimacy.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {59--71} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3483},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/3483}
}
Akmal, Ilyas Syarofian, Novelia Fitri Prasista, Yuni Purnama Sari, and Aditya Muhammad Noor. “Agama Dan Relasi Budaya Dalam Islam: Menjelajahi Peran Penting Budaya Dalam Pembentukan Identitas Keagaman.” AL AUFA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kajian Keislaman 5, no. 2 (2023): 113–33. https://doi.org/10.32665/ALAUFA.v5i2.1667.
Algeria, Ilo Natlex. Relative Aux Relations De Travail, Modifiée Et Complétée Modifiée Et Complétée, Pub. L. No. Loi n° 90-11 du 21 (1990). https://www.mtess.gov.dz/fr/.
Ali, Apriyodi, Achmad Fitrian, and Putra Hutomo. “Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Sebuah Perjanjian Baku Ditinjau Berdasarkan Pasal 1338 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.” SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah 1, no. 2 (2022): 270–78.
Amel, Benachi. “The Legal System of Judicial Conciliation in Civil Litigation under The Algerian.” Journal of Law and Political Science 12, no. 1 (2025): 384–99. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/262624.
Aulia, Nurul, Kristin Oule Simbolon, Ai Naya Azkia Zahra, Diaz Pradipa Winandar, Zahra Fauzia Hidayat, and Ratna Fitria. “Gotong Royong Di Desa Lagadar: Membangun Kebersamaan Dengan Nilai Pancasila.” Jurnal Pendidikan Non Formal 2, no. 4 (2025): 10–10. https://doi.org/10.47134/JPN.V2I4.1712.
Azis, Yuldiana Zesa, and Ahmad Ali Muddin. “Revitalisasi Hukum Waris Adat Dalam Masyarakat Marind: Penguatan Nilai Lokal Di Papua Selatan.” Jurnal Hukum Cassowary 2, no. 1 (2025): 22–33. https://jurnal.asthagrafika.com/index.php/cas/article/view/151.
Boulassel, and Soufiane. “Challenges of Civil Society Organizations in Tourism in Algeria: A Civil Participation Approach.” Http://Journals.Openedition.Org/Espacoeconomia, no. 22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4000/ESPACOECONOMIA.21202.
Bruegel, Martin. “Law, Labour and Lunch in France at the Turn of the Twentieth Century.” International Review of Social History 68, no. 2 (2023): 257–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859023000214.
Burhanudin, Achmad Asfi. “Eksistensi Hukum Adat Di Era Modernisasi.” Salimiya: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam 2, no. 4 (2021): 96–113. https://doi.org/10.2906/SALIMIYA.v2i4.466.
Chaami, Marouane, Slimane Bedrani, Abdelwahab Bessaad, and Fatima Lambarraa-Lehnhardt. “Why Is There a Shortage of Agricultural Labor in Algeria? Evidence from M’zirâa, Southern Algeria’s Leading Vegetable Market.” New Medit 1, no. 2025 (2025). https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2501h.
Clark, Hannah Louise. “The Islamic Origins of the French Colonial Welfare State: Hospital Finance in Algeria.” European Review of History: Revue Européenne d’histoire 28, no. 5–6 (2021): 689–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2021.1990867.
Disantara, Fradhana Putra. “Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia Sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum.” Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam 6, no. 1 (2021): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.35673/AJMPI.v6i1.1129.
Djemaiai, Asma. “Analyse De La Procédure D’assurance Des Salariés En Algérie. Cas De Chu.” Universite Mouloud Ministere De L’enseignement Superieur Et De La Recherchescientifiquemammeri, 2022.
Dwihastini, Evi Rosa, Didin Hikmah Perkasa, and Ahmad Badawi Saluy. “Kebijakan Ketenagakerjaan Internasional Dan Peran Atase Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Perlindungan Pekerja Migran.” Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 10, no. 6 (2025). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i6.59507.
Feriandy, Andriansyah, Edi Riesnandar, and Angga Nugraha. Dinamika Hubungan Industrial Era Modern: Antara Idealisme, Realita, Kepentingan Buruh, Dan Pengusaha. Yogyakarta: Pohon Cahaya, 2025.
Gustamar, Andri, Efrinaldi, Rahmat Hidayat, and Benazza Amal. “Transformation Of Family Law In Algeria Analysis Of The Pre- And Post Independence Period.” Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 3, no. 1 (2025): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.52496/MJHKI.v3i1.68.
Halima, Bahri, and Hadj Soudi Mohamed. “The Concept Of The Binding Authority of Arbitration Decisions In Collective Labor Disputes : A Study In Light of Algerian Law.” Russian Law Journal 12, no. 2 (2024). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/the-concept-of-the-binding-authority-of-arbitration-decisions-in-collective-labor-disputes-a-study-in-light-of-algerian-law.
Hichem, Bencherif Mohammed, and Kadaoui Soumia. “Mediation and the Legal Translator’s Obligation in the Face of Differing Legal Systems in Algeria: Theoretical Benchmarks.” Man and Field Magazine 9, no. 2 (2023): 258–78. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/233551.
Houdret, Annabelle, and Hichem Amichi. “The Rural Social Contract in Morocco and Algeria: Reshaping through Economic Liberalisation and New Rules and Practices.” The Journal of North African Studies 27, no. 4 (2022): 641–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2020.1848560.
Kurniawan, I. Gede Agus, Putu Aras Samsithawrati, Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan, Fradhana Putra Disantara, and Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo. “Legal Reform in Business Dispute Resolution: A Study of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 6, no. 2 (2025): 569–616. https://doi.org/10.15294/JLLR.v6i2.21128.
Lestari, Septi Indah, and Novia Putri Rahmadani. “Implikasi Hukum Masyarakat Dalam Penegakan Keadilan Sosial Di Era Modern: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 93/Puu-Xx/2022.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 10, no. 24 (2024): 647–58. http://www.jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/JIWP/article/view/9131.
Mahardika, Hery, M Galang Asmara, and Muh Risnain. “Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat Melalui Lembaga Adat Di Kabupaten Lombok Utara.” JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 9, no. 4 (2022): 2107–21. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v9i4.
Mansouri, Mohamed Charif. “English and Algerian Legal Cultures Formation: A Comparative Anthropological Study.” Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research 5, no. 2 (2024): 460–70. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijssr.05.02.08.
Mantili, Rai. “Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Antara Serikat Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan Melalui Combined Process (Med-Arbitrase).” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021): 47–65. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.252.
Muhni, Afif, Eko Saputra, Nila Amania, and Nuriyah Fara Muthia. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia: Sejarah, Sistem, Sumber Hukum Dan HAM Di Indonesia. Edited by Indah Khairun Nisya. Cetakan Pe. Yogyakarta: Star Digital Publishing, 2025.
Ndraha, Abdian Berkat, Siti Marwiyah, Bachrul Amiq, and Wahyu Prawesthi. “Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Pada Masyarakat Adat Dayak Di Kabupaten Seruyan, Kalimantan Tengah.” COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916) 5, no. 01 (2025): 41–53. https://doi.org/10.69957/CR.v5i01.1728.
Puryanto, Sidik, and Sardjiyo. “Persepsi Masyarakat Baduy Terhadap Konflik.” Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora 6, no. 4 (2023): 936–43. https://doi.org/10.37329/GANAYA.v6i4.2709.
Salam, Safrin, Rizki Mustika Suhartono, Edy Nurcahyo, La Ode Muhammad Karim, Erick Bason, and Sulayman. “Pengakuan Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Di Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja: Perspektfi Teori Hukum Kritis.” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 5, no. 1 (2024): 721–32. https://doi.org/10.22225/JUINHUM.5.1.7166.721-732.
Sholikin, Ahmad. “‘Social Security’ Bagi Tenaga Kerja Informal Pada Sektor Industri Ekstraktif Di Bojonegoro.” Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 16, no. 02 (2024): 225–48. https://doi.org/10.52166/MADANI.v16i02.7401.
Sutrisno, Sutrisno, Dayat Limbong, and Yusuf Hanafi Pasaribu. “Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (Phk) Akibat Pelanggaran Perjanjian Kerja Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Pt Tekno Cipta Dwidaya.” Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 1 (2024): 132–42. https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/FIAT/article/view/4145.
Syah, Irwan, Miswardi Miswardi, Muhammad Luthfi, and Muhammad Inamul Hasan. “Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Eksistensi Hukum Islam Dan Adat.” Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan 4, no. 2 (2025): 363–74. https://doi.org/10.47200/AWTJHPSA.v4i2.2910.
Tamburini, Francesco. “The History of the Algerian Islamic High Council: Promoting and Preserving the ‘True Islam’ for National Unity and Stability.” Journal of Asian and African Studies, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096241270686.
———. “Who Controls the Past Controls the Future: How Algeria Manipulated History and Legitimated Power Using Its Constitutional Charters and Legislation.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 57, no. 2 (2022): 226–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096211013416.
Wahyuningrum, Ana Liana, and Darwanto Darwanto. “Penerapan Bagi Hasil Maro Perspektif Akad Mukhabarah.” TAWAZUN : Journal of Sharia Economic Law 3, no. 1 (July 7, 2020): 45. https://doi.org/10.21043/TAWAZUN.v3i1.7544.
Walenta, Karina Nataya, Nur Mohamad Kasim, and Lusiana Margaret Tijow. “Pemenuhan Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Adat Suku Polahi Di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan.” Philosophia Law Review 2, no. 1 (2022): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56591/PILAR.v2i1.14125.
Yitawati, Krista, Meirza Aulia Cahirani, and Angga Pramodya Pradhana. “Problematika Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Cipta Kerja Klaster Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Dan Kesejahteraan Pekerja.” Jurnal Rechtens 13, no. 1 (2024): 97–118. https://doi.org/10.56013/Rechtens.v13i1.2671.
Zakarriya, Jihan. “Female Activism, Tribalism, and Shame in the Arabian Gulf.” In Shame and Gender in Transcultural Contexts, 139–57. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54593-1_8.
Zasuń, Anna. “The Compromise of Islamism and Democracy in the Light of the Tunisian Revolution and Views of Rachid Al-Gannouchi.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 52, no. 2 (2025): 401–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2023.2281424.
Zulfa, Qatrunnada Assyifa Shabrina, Rachmad Indrawan Sidiq, and Aryo Subroto. “Tradisi Carok Dalam Pluralisme Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 7, no. 2 (2024): 224–33. https://doi.org/10.38043/JAH.v7i2.5243.
: 22 times
Download : 1 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | The Interplay of Customary Law and Labor Regulations: A Comparative Legal Pluralism Study in Indonesia and Algeria |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Mahmuda Pancawisma Febriharini; Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Semarang; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Kunarto Kunarto; Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Semarang; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Bakhouya Driss; Faculty Law and Political Sciences, University of Adrar, Adrar; Algeria |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Legal Pluralism; Customary Law; Labor Regulation; Employment Relations. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: This study examines the interaction between customary law and national labor regulations in Indonesia and Algeria through the lens of legal pluralism. The research is motivated by the persistent coexistence of formal state law and traditional practices in shaping employment relations, which is particularly evident in societies with strong communal and religious traditions. Both Indonesia and Algeria represent cases where historical legacies of colonialism, post-independence political choices, and enduring social structures have produced distinctive forms of legal pluralism in labor relations.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to compare how legal pluralism operates in the two countries to regulate employment relations, resolve labor disputes, and accommodate customary norms within national frameworks.Methods of the Research: This study applies a normative legal research method with a comparative legal approach. Primary data sources include statutory regulations such as the Indonesian Labour Law Number 13 of 2003 (as amended by the Job Creation Law 2020 and Law Number 6 of 2023) and the Algerian Labour Code (Law Number 90-11/1990), while secondary data are drawn from academic literature, case studies, and reports from international institutions like the ILO. Data were analyzed using a descriptive-comparative technique to identify similarities, differences, and integration patterns between customary law and national labor regulations.Results of the Research: The findings reveal that both Indonesia and Algeria institutionalize pluralism by formally recognizing certain customary practices, such as oral employment agreements in Algeria and community-based contractual practices in Indonesia. This novelty lies in demonstrating how pluralism is not merely a social phenomenon but also a legally recognized mechanism for regulating labor relations and dispute resolution. This study advances existing knowledge by showing that legal pluralism provides a flexible and context-sensitive framework for labor law, balancing global standards with local legitimacy. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2026-03-24 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/3483 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3483 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Volume 32 Issue 1, March 2026 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2026 Mahmuda Pancawisma Febriharini, Kunarto Kunarto, Bakhouya Driss
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
