(Abstracts are written in 2 languages, namely English and Indonesian. Writing abstract title using bolds for abstract substance written Book Antiqua, 10 pt, italic, 1 space, max 250 words)
Introduction: provides a brief introduction to the problem under study. For example: This article analyzes competition laws related to the abuse of market position. (50-60 words)
Purposes of the Research: briefly describe the purpose of this study, For example: The purpose of this article is to survey predatory pricing as a phenomenon both inside and outside the European Union. (50-60 words)
Methods of the Research: Briefly state the research method based on a focus of study, namely empirical research, or normative research, with the research approach used. (50-60 words)
Results / Main Findings / Novelty/Originality of the Research: What is new in this Research that may benefit readers and how it is advancing the existing knowledge or creating new knowledge in this subject. It is at the heart of a research report because a finding is what the reader is actually looking for. The findings component does not have to present all the things that are found in the research, it is presented that the findings are relevant to the nature of this research. For example: The results show that or The findings of this study prove that businesses that reached their dominant position before the recession had a significant advantage over small businesses. However, they cannot be compelled to act on the same basis for very long, which is why a more US-like model would be useful for controlling some of these business behaviors.
(50-60 words).Key writing uses Book Antiqua, 10 pt in size, italics. Keywords are written in words or phrases, preferably in phrases. Keywords consist of 3-5 words or 3-5 phrases, and must be separated by semicolons (;) not comma(,)
The introduction should be clear and provide the issue to be discussed in the manuscript. Before the objective, authors should provide an adequate background, and very short literature survey in order to record the existing solutions, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what do you hope to achieve (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper.[1] At the end of the paragraph, the author/s should end with a comment on the significance concerning identification of the issue and objective of the research.[2] This article analyses the comparative competition law related to abuse of a dominant market position using strategy of predatory pricing by undertakings in the European Union (hereinafter ‘EU’). For this purpose, a precise case study of the Valio case has been made.[3] Antti Aine, Adjunct Professor of general competition law at the University of Turku as expert in field of European Competition Law, has been interviewed for this article.[4] Also, EU law on predatory pricing has been compared to the United States’ predatory pricing law.
Therefore, this article explores the following research questions; whether EU Competition law policy is already excessively restrictive, and if so, what is the effect on the business development of undertakings with only one nationally dominant market position and, whether the products, which are legally classified as belonging to different product markets, belong de facto to the same product market in case of being fully interchangeable with each other?.
LITERATURE REVIEW (OPTIONAL)
METHODS OF THE RESEARCH
The method is optional for original research articles. This method is written in descriptive and should provide a statement regarding the methodology of the research. This method as much as possible to give an idea to the reader through the methods used. This Method are optional, only for original research articles.[5] Example of writing Research Methods: This paper uses normative legal research methods because the focus of the study departs from the blurring of norms, using approaches: statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. The technique of tracing legal materials uses document study techniques, as well as analysis of studies using qualitative analysis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The writing of the Results and Discussion section contains the results or research findings (scientific finding) which is followed by a scientific discussion. The description of the discussion in the Results and Discussion chapter is descriptive, analytical and critical. The description of the discussion must be adjusted to the sequence of legal issues that are the main elements in the study. Theories included in the theoretical framework should be cited in this chapter. The state of art listed in the Introduction Section is also reviewed and elaborated in the Results and Discussion Section. The analysis in the Results and Discussion section can be supported by a table that is presented horizontally. Table presentation is equipped with “Table Title” and “Table Source.” Each Table is followed by the author's review and comments as part of the analysis of the Tables presented. In addition to the table, the provisions of the Act or other regulations presented are accompanied by studies and opinions of the authors in strengthening and sharpening the analysis of articles submitted for publication.
Tables and Figures are presented center and cited in the manuscript. The figures should be clearly readable and at least have a resolution of 300 DPI (Dots Per Inch) for good printing quality.
- A. Main Heading of the First Analysis or Discussion
This section is the most important section of your article. The analysis or results of the research should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.
- B. Main Heading of the Second Analysis or Discussion etc..
This section is the most important section of your article. The analysis or results of the research should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.
etc…
CONCLUSION
Conclusion contains a description that should answer the objectives of research. Provide a clear and concise conclusion. Do not repeat the Abstract or simply describe the results of the research. Give a clear explanation regarding the possible application and/or suggestions related to the research findings.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (OPTIONAL)
Recognize those who helped in the research, especially funding supporter of your research. Include individuals who have assisted you in your study: Advisors, Financial supporters, or may other supporter i.e. Proof-readers, Typists, and Suppliers who may have given materials.
[2] Example for Journal Articles references: Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun, “A Legal Awareness of Copyright on Regional Song Creators,” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 5, no. 1 (2021): 49–61, https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15406
[4] Vinod Dhall, ed. Competition law today: Concepts, issues, and the law in practice. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 83.
[5] Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2007), h. 56. https://doi.org/340.072.
REFERENCES
Bibliography in the research article as well as conceptual ideas contains all references used in the study. References used in writing come from publications and publications in the last 10 (ten) years. The composition of the reference list / bibliography is highly recommended to maximize the use of primary sources (60%) in the form of national journals, international journals, theses, dissertations, proceedings conferences both national and international. Other sources (40%) can be in the form of books or other reference sources. Each article submitted uses a minimum of 10 (ten) references by maximizing the primary source, and only references used as citations are written in the Bibliography, and written in alphabetical order (arranged alphabetically) by the author.
This journal uses the writing of the APA (American Psychological Association) Citation Style model. It is recommended for authors to use the standard Mendeley, EndNote.
Endnotes
This journal uses the Endnotes model to write down the sources cited by the author.
Last name, first name abbreviation. Year of publication in parentheses. Book title (italic). Place of publication: Name of the publisher.
Example:
Book titled Hukum Organisasi Perusahaan. The author Dr. Teng Berlianty,S.H.,M.Hum. Published by Zifatama Jawara. publishing place Sidoarjo. year 2019.
How to write it in the Batulis Civil Law Review Journal Reading / Reference List:
[1] Berlianty, T. (2019). Hukum Organisasi Perusahaan. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara.
Peter Van Den Bossche.(2008). The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials. New York:Cambridge University Press.
How to write it in the Batulis Civil Law Review Journal Reading / Reference List:
[2] Bossche, P.V.D. (2008). The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials. New York:Cambridge University Press.
- A book that is more than one author:
The last name, the first author's first name abbreviation, & the last name, the second author's first name. Year of publication in parentheses. Book title (italic). Place of publication: Name of the publisher.
Example:
Book titled Buku Ajar HUKUM ISLAM. Penulis Dr. Barzah Latupono,SH.,MH. Dr La Ode Angga,S.Ag.,SH.,M.Hum, Muchtar Aanshary Hamid Labetubun,SH.,MH. Sabri Fataruba,SH.,L.LM. publishing place Yogyakarta pada Tahun 2017. Pubisher: Deepublish.
How to write it in the Batulis Civil Law Review Journal Reading / Reference List:
[3] Latupono, B. Angga, L. O. Labetubun, M. A. H. Fataruba. S. (2011). Buku Ajar HUKUM ISLAM. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Journal
[4] Angga, L. O., Latupono, B., Labetubun, M. A. H., & Fataruba, S. (2019). Effectiveness of Law Number 41 the Year 1999 in the Case of Illegal Logging in Maluku Province. Cepalo, 3(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v3no2.1848
[5] Berlianty, T. (2018). Penguatan Eksistensi Bahasa Tana dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bahasa Daerah sebagai Warisan Budaya Bangsa. Kertha Patrika, 40 (2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2018.v40.i02.p04
Thesis or Dissertation
Writing in sequence is: author's last name, abbreviation of the first name. year in parentheses. Title of the thesis or dissertation in italics. Thesis / Dissertation, University name.
Example:
[6] Labetubun, Muchtar A. H (2010). Perlindungan Hukum HaKI atas Desain Industri terhadap Produk Kerajinan Kerang Mutiara dalan Pemberdayaan Usaha Kecil di Kota Ambon. Tesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
World Wide Web
Online source writing: author's last name, short for first name. in parentheses. Article title. Retrieved from website URL, accessed date.
Example:
[7] United Nations and the Rule of Law. (2015). Environmental Law. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/thematic-areas/land-property-environment/environmental-law/, diakses 9 April 2020.
