Eksekusi Aset Debitor yang Berada Di Luar Negeri dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan

Rizka Rahmawati(1*)

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

In order to carry out business activities, it is not uncommon for someone to make a debt to have enough capital. These accounts payable activities of course require objects that are a guarantee to give a sense of security to creditors. In its development it is not uncommon for collateral objects to be held by debtors abroad. However, if the collateral object is located abroad, it will not be easy to execute as a debt repayment tool because of the state sovereignty that must be respected and the territoriality principle adopted by a country. The problem in this writing is about how Indonesia's national legal regulation regarding debtors 'assets is located abroad and how efforts can be made so that debtors' assets residing abroad can be executed as debt repayment tools. This research will be conducted using a type of normative juridical research with a type of legislative approach (concept approach) and a conceptual approach. According to the provisions of Article 212 PKPU UUK, that property owned by bankrupt debtors abroad can be used as bankrupt boedel. The provisions of the article give the right to a creditor to obtain repayment by using debtor's assets which are not bound to him which are outside the jurisdiction of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. In order for collateral objects to be used abroad to be used as a debt repayment tool, a number of ways can be taken, namely by a general court process, bilateral agreements (diplomatic agreements), diplomatic channels, or using the UNCITRAL Law on Cross Model. Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment.

Keywords

Guarantee Objects; Execution; Foreign Affairs

References

Buku

[1] Bayu Seto Hardjowahono, 2013, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perdata Internasional (Buku Kesatu Edisi Kelima), Penerbit PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

[2] Hikmah, Mutiara. (2007). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perdata Internasional dalam Perkara-Perkara Kepailitan. Jakarta: Refika Aditama.

[3] Soekanto, S. & Mamudji. S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Jurnal dan Lain-Lain

[4] Assalmani, M., & Priyono, D. (2018). KONSEP PENGATURAN CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY BADAN USAHA DI ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS (ASEAN) DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN ASEAN ECONOMIC INTEGRATION (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Hukum).

[5] Fuady, M. (2002). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Arbitrase. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Bisnis, Jakarta, 21.

[6] Kartoningrat, R. B., & Andayani, I. (2018). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit oleh Kurator Kepailitan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 2(1), 291-305.

[7] Makmur, S. (2018). Kepastian Hukum Kepailitan Bagi Kreditur dan Debitur Pada Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 4(2).

[8] Retnaningsih, S. (2018). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITOR PAILIT INDIVIDU DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA KEPAILITAN DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER, 3(1), 1-16.

[9] Sihotang, E. G., Atmadja, I. B. P., & Sukihana, I. A. DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DAN UPAYA HUKUM DEBITOR PAILIT TERKAIT PENGGUNAAN PAKSA BADAN DALAM KEPAILITAN.

[10] Setiawan. (1998), “Kepailitan Konsep-Konsep Dasar Serta Pengertiannya”, Kumpulan Makalah Calon Hakim Pengadilan Niaga, Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

[11] Wikipedia. (2018). Jaminan. Retrieved from: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaminan.

[12] Wikipedia. (2019). Hubungan Luar Negeri Indonesia. Retrieved from: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubungan_luar_negeri_Indonesia.

Article Metrics

Abstract views: 94
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Views: 56

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Rizka Rahmawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.