Implementation of Temporary Procedures and Minimum Standards for Countries That Do Not Ratify the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol
Penerapan Temporary Prtoection dan Standar Minimum Bagi Negara yang Tidak Meratifikasi Konvensi 1951 dan Protokol 1967
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v6i2.3413Keywords:
Temporary Protection, International Refugees, Non-Participating States, Non-Refoulement Principles, International LawAbstract
Introduction: The increasing flow of international refugees due to armed conflict and human rights violations poses challenges for countries that are not participants in the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol, including Indonesia as a transit country.
Purposes of the Research: This study examines the implementation of temporary protection by non-party countries and its relation to the fulfillment of minimum human rights standards for international refugees.
Methods of the Research: Through descriptive-prescriptive normative legal methods with legal and comparative approaches, it was found that.
Results Main Findings of the Research: It was found that temporary protection can be applied by non-party states based on the principle of non-refoulement which is customary international law. There is a close link between temporary protection and the fulfillment of minimum human rights standards; failure to comply with it can be considered a violation of international law. This study suggests the establishment of a national legal framework in Indonesia to regulate international refugees and guarantee their basic rights.
References
Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-Refoulement Obligations, UNHCR, 2007.
Dio Herdiawan Tobing, Indonesia’s Refugee Policy – Not Ideal, but a Step in The Right Direction, The Conversation, 6 September 2017, https://theconversation.com/indonesias-refugee-policy-not-ideal-but-a-step-in-the-right-direction-75395/.
Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming The Human Rights Enforcement Problem, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Hendrik O Melatunan, Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata, and Wilshen Leatemia. "Pengaturan Tentang Pengungsi Dan Tanggung Jawab UNCHR Bagi HAM Para Pengungsi" TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 11 (2024): 1069-1081, https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i11.2099.
Heru Susetyo, Heri Aryanto, and Ryan Muthiara Wasti. Rohingya: Suara Etnis Yang Tak Boleh Bersuara. (Jakarta: Pusat Advokasi Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Indonesia (PAHAM), 2013.
Iin Karita Sakharina, "Posisi Indonesia sebagai Transit Country dan Masifnya Pengungsi Internasional." Amanna Gappa 28, no. 1 (2020), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.20956/ag.v28i1.14218.
James C Hathaway. The Rights of Refugees under International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Downloads
Article History
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syenie Angel Pattiasina, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, Irma Halima Hanafi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
