Criminal Accountability in Cases of Threats and Dissemination of Cyber Immoral Content: Realizing Digital Justice for Victims

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kasus Ancaman dan Penyebaran Muatan Asusila Siber: Mewujudkan Keadilan Digital Bagi Korban

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v6i2.3742

Keywords:

Digital Justice, Cybercrime, Criminal Liability, Immorality

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid development of information and communication technology has changed the landscape of people's lives, making the digital space an essential arena for interaction. However, this progress has also opened a gap for the birth of cybercrime, including threats and the spread of immoral content through electronic media. These crimes not only violate legal norms, but also threaten the privacy, dignity, and psychological condition of victims, thus creating new challenges in realizing justice.

Purposes of the Research: To analyze the criminal law arrangements in Indonesia related to criminal acts of threats and the dissemination of immoral content through electronic media, examine the criminal liability of perpetrators based on the Tanjungkarang District Court Decision Number 1056/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tjk, and evaluate the extent to which the judge's considerations in the decision reflect the principles of digital justice for victims.

Methods of the Research: The research uses normative and empirical legal approaches with conceptual study methods, legislative analysis, and case studies. Secondary data (laws and regulations, literature) and primary data (interviews with law enforcement officials) were collected and analyzed qualitatively.

Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings show that Indonesia's criminal law, through the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, the Pornography Law, and the Criminal Code, has comprehensively regulated this crime. The criminal responsibility of the perpetrators has been analyzed based on the elements of acts, mistakes, and the ability to be responsible. The Tanjungkarang District Court Decision Number 1056/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tjk reflects the principle of digital justice by considering the psychological and social impact of the victim and imposing strict penalties. However, the digital justice that is realized is still partial because it does not explicitly include a comprehensive victim recovery mechanism.

References

A. Rahayu, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Malicious Distribution (Ancaman Penyebaran) Konten Pornografi di Indonesia,” Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 11, no. 1 (2021): 57.

Bambang Hartono, Intan N. S., Suta Ramadan, dan Benny K. Limantara, Hukum Pidana, Bandar Lampung: UBL Press, 2024.

Bambang Hartono, Benny K. Limantara, dan Iqbal Alfaruki, “The Judicial Considerations in Determining Criminal Sanctions for Complicity in Promoting Online Gambling Sites (A Study of Decision No. 967/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tjk),” TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal 4, no. 8 (2025): 4226.

C. Juditha, “Isu Pornografi dan Penyebarannya di Twitter (Kasus Video Asusila Mirip Artis),” Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Opini Publik 25, no. 1 (2021): 16.

D. W. Putri, Fadlan, H. Kurniawan, dan S. M. Ginting, “Analisis Tindak Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyebaran Video Asusila di Batam (Studi Penelitian di Subdit Cyber Ditreskrimsus Polda Kepri),” Zona Keadilan: Program Studi Ilmu Hukum (S1) Universitas Batam 14, no. 1 (2024): 5.

. B. Gurusinga, M. Ekaputra, dan Marlina, “Upaya Penanganan Kasus Penyebaran Konten Asusila Melalui Media Elektronik oleh Subdit Siber Polda Sumatera Utara,” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 3, no. 2 (2024): 219–220.

Maskun, Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime): Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2022.

Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2023.

N. Aini dan F. Lubis, “Tantangan Pembuktian dalam Kasus Kejahatan Siber,” Judge: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2024): 56.

Roeslan Saleh, Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2016.

Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2023.

Soedarto, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2017.

Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 2013.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2023.

V. T. Khalbi, D. G. Maulani, dan D. R. Monica, “Kajian Normatif dan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Penyebaran Informasi Elektronik Bermuatan Kesusilaan dan Ancaman,” Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan 12, no. 12 (2025): 51–60.

Z. Abdussamad dan M. H. Muhtar, “Etika Penggunaan Media Sosial dalam Promosi Destinasi Wisata di Desa Patoameme,” Akuntansi dan Humaniora: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 1, no. 2 (2022): 132–139.

Downloads

Published

Published: September 9, 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates

Article History

Received: January 25, 2026
Accepted: August 23, 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Criminal Accountability in Cases of Threats and Dissemination of Cyber Immoral Content: Realizing Digital Justice for Victims: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kasus Ancaman dan Penyebaran Muatan Asusila Siber: Mewujudkan Keadilan Digital Bagi Korban. (2026). PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 6(2), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v6i2.3742

Article Metrics

Abstract Views 0

Full Text Views 0
Last updated: September 8, 2026

Most read articles by the same author(s)