Judge's Considerations in Assessing the Continued and Burdensome Theft of Toll Road Barrier Iron

Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menilai Pencurian Besi Pembatas Jalan Tol yang Berlanjut dan Memberatkan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v6i2.3750

Keywords:

Judge's Consideration, Legal Consequences, Continued Theft, Incriminating Circumstances, Toll Roads

Abstract

Introduction: The rampant theft of public facilities, including toll road guardrails, is an unlawful act that causes material losses to managers and has the potential to endanger the safety of road users. The complexity of this crime increases when carried out continuously, magnifying the impact of losses and risks, and causing public unrest that requires stricter supervision of toll road infrastructure.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the judge's considerations in deciding the case of the theft of toll road barrier iron which is carried out continuously and in incriminating circumstances, based on the study of Decision Number 13/Pid.B/2025/PN Tjk.

Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical approach by examining applicable laws, as well as an empirical approach through interviews with investigators, public prosecutors, and judges at the Tanjung Karang District Court. Secondary data were obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, as well as primary data from interviews.

Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings show that the legal consequences against the perpetrators in Decision Number 13/Pid.B/2025/PN Tjk are comprehensive and proportional, including detention, imprisonment for 2 (two) years, confiscation and return of evidence, and the imposition of case costs. This is in line with the theory of legal consequences of R. Soeroso, which emphasizes that every criminal event gives rise to rights and obligations for the perpetrator as well as the authority of the state to uphold justice. The judge's consideration in deciding this case has met the elements of continuing and incriminating theft, including the analysis of evidence, trial facts, social impact, and aggravating and mitigating circumstances. This finding is in line with the theory of consideration of judge Sudikno Mertokusumo in balancing legal certainty, justice, and benefits for the defendant and the community.

References

Daffa Ladro Kusworo, Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi. “Diversion In the Settlement of Crime Theft by Minor at Tanjung Karang District Court”. Cepalo Journal 7, no. 1 (2023), h.30. https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/cepalo/article/view/2855.

Erlina Bachri, Nauval Murtadho. “Implementasi Pembuatan Surat Tuntutan Jaksa dan Hubungannya Dengan Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Pencurian (Studi Putusan Nomor 1085/Pid.B/2023/PN Tjk)”, Jurnal Rectum 6, no. 3 (2024), h. 546. https://jurnal.universitasdarmaagung.ac.id/jurnalrectum/article/view/4752.

Ismu Gunadi, Jonaedi Efensi. Cepat dan Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.

Kasmanto Rinaldi,dkk. Dinamika Kejahatan dan Pencegahannya Potret Beberapa Kasus Kejahatan di Provinsi Riau, Malang: Ahlimedia Press, 2022.

Merliana S. Koesumoatmadja, Rochmani. “Penanggulangan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan (CURAT) Yang Dilakukan Oleh Begal di Wilayah Hukum Polrestabes Semarang”, Jurnal of Swara Justisia 7, no. 3 (2023), h. 945. https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/view/399.

Rian Prayudi Saputra. “Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Indonesia”, Jurnal Pahlawan 2, no. 2 (2020), h. 2. https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jp/article/download/573/491/20823.

Rumpang, A., Rahman, Natsir. “Identifikasi Sidik Jari Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pencurian”, Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 9, no. 1 (2021): 26-33. http://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/54.

Tami Rusli. “Analisis Gugatan Wanprestasi Dalam Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Putusan Nomor 127/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Tk)”, Jurnal Pranata Hukum 11, no. 1 (2016), h. 52. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/160172-ID-analisis-gugatan-wanprestasi-dalam-jual.pdf.

Downloads

Published

Published: September 9, 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates

Article History

Received: January 26, 2026
Accepted: August 23, 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Judge’s Considerations in Assessing the Continued and Burdensome Theft of Toll Road Barrier Iron: Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menilai Pencurian Besi Pembatas Jalan Tol yang Berlanjut dan Memberatkan. (2026). PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 6(2), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v6i2.3750

Article Metrics

Abstract Views 0

Full Text Views 0
Last updated: September 8, 2026

Most read articles by the same author(s)