Enforcement of Distributive Justice in Criminal Accountability of Narcotics Abusers Class I Not Plants
Penegakan Keadilan Distributif Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penyalahguna Narkotika Golongan I Bukan Tanaman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v6i2.3759Keywords:
Criminal Liability, Narcotics Abuse, Judicial Decision.Abstract
Introduction: The abuse of Class I narcotics that are not plants for personal interests is an unlawful act that has a serious impact on individuals and society.
Purposes of the Research: Examine the application of criminal liability against perpetrators of Class I narcotics abuse that is not a plant for personal interests and analyze whether the imposition of criminal sanctions in Decision Number: 70/Pid.Sus/2025/PNTjk has reflected the principle of justice.
Methods of the Research: The research method uses a normative and empirical juridical approach, by examining laws and regulations, court decisions, and interviews with judges, police investigators, and the National Narcotics Agency.
Results Main Findings of the Research: The results of the study show that the application of criminal responsibility in Decision Number: 70/Pid.Sus/2025/PNTjk has fulfilled the element of criminal responsibility according to Moeljatno's theory, because the defendant is proven to have committed a criminal act with a mistake and without a justifiable or forgiving reason. The imposition of prison criminal sanctions reflects Aristotle's distributive justice in the sense of proportionality, but the justice realized is still juridical-formal because it has not optimized the rehabilitative approach. These findings underscore the importance of a balance between formal legal certainty and substantive justice in handling narcotics cases.
References
Ahmad Rifai. Narkoba Di Balik Tembok Penjara. Yogyakarta: UGM Press, 2020.
Dimas Adit Sutono, Alpi Sahari, dan Surya Perdana. ”Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Kepada Anak Dibawah Umur Pemakai Narkotika (Studi Pada Polrestabes Medan)”, Journal Recht (JR) 1, no. 1 (2022)
Emil Fitra Nur, Muhammad Natsir, Phireri, dan Khaerul Mannan. 2004. Melangkah Ke Dalam Kegelapan: Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Dalam Pengaruh Alkohon”, Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 11, no. 3 (2004): 282-296.
I Ketut Seregig, Gindha Ansori Wayka, dan Mutiara Fitri. ”Penegakkan Hukum Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Jual Beli Narkotika Golongan I Bukan Tanaman (Studi Putusan Nomor 199/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Tjk)”, Unizar Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 256-265.
Moh. Taufik Makarao. Tindak Pidana Narkotika. (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2003.
Zainab Ompu Jainah, Erlina B, Hendri Dunan, Intan Nurina Seftiniara. Buku Saku Petunjuk Teknis Penyelenggaraan Layanan Rehabilitasi Rawat Jalan Bagi Penyalahguna Narkotika. (Bandar Lampung: Universitas Bandar Lampung Press, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Article History
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yulyanti Simamora, Erina Pane
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
Article Metrics
