Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anggota Polri Yang Melakukan Penyalahgunaan Senjata Api
)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Normatively, Indonesia is actually a country that is quite strict in implementing the rules of gun ownership for civilians. There are a number of legal bases that regulate this, starting from the level of the Law, namely Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951, Law Number 8 of 1948 and PERPU Number 20 of 1960. The rest are regulations issued by the Police such as the Chief of Police Decree No. Skep/244/II/1999 and Chief of Police Decree No. 82 of 2004 concerning the Implementation of Supervision and Control of Non-Organic Weapons. In fact, the use of firearms must be very sensitive and selective, not in every condition of handling crimes the police must show, point and even pop their firearms. In Perkap 01 of 2009 concerning the purpose of the use of force in police actions Article 2 states: The purpose of the use of force in police actions is: prevent, inhibit, or stop the actions of criminals or suspects who are attempting or carrying out actions that are against the law; prevent criminals or suspects from escaping or taking actions that endanger members of the Police or the public; protect themselves or the public from the threat of acts or actions of criminals or suspects that can cause severe or deadly injuries; or protect the honor of decency or property of oneself or the community from attacks that are against rights and / or threaten human life. Various cases of shooting or misuse of firearms by members of the police have resulted in the public becoming victims.
Purposes of the Research: This article aims to analyze and discuss law enforcement for members of the National Police in the misuse of firearms and analyze and discuss the application of criminal sanctions against members of the National Police who misuse firearms.
Methods of the Research: Research methods used with normative juridical research type. The problem approach used is the legislation approach, the concept analysis approach, the case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The collection technique is through literature studies and is further analyzed through the way of description using qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: The results showed that in law enforcement against unscrupulous members of the National Police through the application of criminal sanctions in the misuse of firearms through efforts to overcome the misuse of firearms by members of the National Police are grouped into 2 groups, namely repressively and preventively. Repressively, against members of the Police who misuse firearms will be subject to action in the form of disciplinary sanctions and / or criminal sanctions as stipulated in the Criminal Code. Preventive efforts are carried out by tightening psychological tests and mental tests for the right to hold firearms, not allowing members with personal, family or official problems to borrow firearms, and retesting the right to hold firearms for Polri members who hold firearms. The application of criminal sanctions against unscrupulous members of the National Police who misuse firearms resulting in the death of members of the public based on the laws and regulations applicable to unscrupulous members of the National Police is legally processed through a trial process in court and based on the juridical and non-juridical legal considerations of the Judge so that the judge decided that the defendant Markus Manuhutu alias Max alias Maku was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act due to his negligence resulting in the death of another person in accordance with Article 359 of the Criminal Code and imposed a prison sentence on the defendant with a prison sentence of 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sanisa.v3i1.1540
Published
2023-04-28
How To Cite
@article{sanisa1540,
author = {Philicia Manuhutu and Saartje Alfons and Denny Latumaerissa},
title = {Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anggota Polri Yang Melakukan Penyalahgunaan Senjata Api},
journal = {SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum},
volume = {3},
number = {1},
year = {2023},
keywords = {Sanctions; Police Officer; Misuse of firearms},
abstract = {Introduction: Normatively, Indonesia is actually a country that is quite strict in implementing the rules of gun ownership for civilians. There are a number of legal bases that regulate this, starting from the level of the Law, namely Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951, Law Number 8 of 1948 and PERPU Number 20 of 1960. The rest are regulations issued by the Police such as the Chief of Police Decree No. Skep/244/II/1999 and Chief of Police Decree No. 82 of 2004 concerning the Implementation of Supervision and Control of Non-Organic Weapons. In fact, the use of firearms must be very sensitive and selective, not in every condition of handling crimes the police must show, point and even pop their firearms. In Perkap 01 of 2009 concerning the purpose of the use of force in police actions Article 2 states: The purpose of the use of force in police actions is: prevent, inhibit, or stop the actions of criminals or suspects who are attempting or carrying out actions that are against the law; prevent criminals or suspects from escaping or taking actions that endanger members of the Police or the public; protect themselves or the public from the threat of acts or actions of criminals or suspects that can cause severe or deadly injuries; or protect the honor of decency or property of oneself or the community from attacks that are against rights and / or threaten human life. Various cases of shooting or misuse of firearms by members of the police have resulted in the public becoming victims.Purposes of the Research: This article aims to analyze and discuss law enforcement for members of the National Police in the misuse of firearms and analyze and discuss the application of criminal sanctions against members of the National Police who misuse firearms.Methods of the Research: Research methods used with normative juridical research type. The problem approach used is the legislation approach, the concept analysis approach, the case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The collection technique is through literature studies and is further analyzed through the way of description using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results showed that in law enforcement against unscrupulous members of the National Police through the application of criminal sanctions in the misuse of firearms through efforts to overcome the misuse of firearms by members of the National Police are grouped into 2 groups, namely repressively and preventively. Repressively, against members of the Police who misuse firearms will be subject to action in the form of disciplinary sanctions and / or criminal sanctions as stipulated in the Criminal Code. Preventive efforts are carried out by tightening psychological tests and mental tests for the right to hold firearms, not allowing members with personal, family or official problems to borrow firearms, and retesting the right to hold firearms for Polri members who hold firearms. The application of criminal sanctions against unscrupulous members of the National Police who misuse firearms resulting in the death of members of the public based on the laws and regulations applicable to unscrupulous members of the National Police is legally processed through a trial process in court and based on the juridical and non-juridical legal considerations of the Judge so that the judge decided that the defendant Markus Manuhutu alias Max alias Maku was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act due to his negligence resulting in the death of another person in accordance with Article 359 of the Criminal Code and imposed a prison sentence on the defendant with a prison sentence of 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months.},
issn = {2776-2289}, pages = {1--13} doi = {10.47268/sanisa.v3i1.1540},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sanisa/article/view/1540}
}
Hartono, 2010, Penyidikan dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Melalui Pendekatan Hukum Progresif, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Josias Simon Runturambi dan Atin Sri Pujiastuti, Senjata Api dan Penanganan Tindak Kriminal, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, 2015
M, Faal, 2000, Penyaringan Perkara Pidana oleh Kepolisian, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta
Parker Thomas and Carter David, Penyimpangan Polisi (terjemahan Police Deviance), Cipta Manunggal. Jakarta, 1999
Runturambi, A. Josias Simon dan Atin Sri Pujiastuti, 2015, Senjata Api dan Penanganan Tindak Kriminal, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta
Topo Santoso dan Eva Achjani Zulfa, Kriminologi, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2001
Yulies Tiena Masriani, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2004
Soedjono Dirdjosisworo, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2012
Jimly Asshiddiqie,Penegakan Hukum, http://www.docudesk.com diakses pada tanggal 28 September 2017.
Saddam Tri Widodo, Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perizinan Perdagangan dan Kepemilikan Senjata Api di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum UNMUL, Vol. II, No. 12 2013
: 1115 times
Download : 5942 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anggota Polri Yang Melakukan Penyalahgunaan Senjata Api |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Philicia Manuhutu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Saartje Sarah Alfons; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Denny Latumaerissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Sanctions; Police Officer; Misuse of firearms |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Normatively, Indonesia is actually a country that is quite strict in implementing the rules of gun ownership for civilians. There are a number of legal bases that regulate this, starting from the level of the Law, namely Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951, Law Number 8 of 1948 and PERPU Number 20 of 1960. The rest are regulations issued by the Police such as the Chief of Police Decree No. Skep/244/II/1999 and Chief of Police Decree No. 82 of 2004 concerning the Implementation of Supervision and Control of Non-Organic Weapons. In fact, the use of firearms must be very sensitive and selective, not in every condition of handling crimes the police must show, point and even pop their firearms. In Perkap 01 of 2009 concerning the purpose of the use of force in police actions Article 2 states: The purpose of the use of force in police actions is: prevent, inhibit, or stop the actions of criminals or suspects who are attempting or carrying out actions that are against the law; prevent criminals or suspects from escaping or taking actions that endanger members of the Police or the public; protect themselves or the public from the threat of acts or actions of criminals or suspects that can cause severe or deadly injuries; or protect the honor of decency or property of oneself or the community from attacks that are against rights and / or threaten human life. Various cases of shooting or misuse of firearms by members of the police have resulted in the public becoming victims.Purposes of the Research: This article aims to analyze and discuss law enforcement for members of the National Police in the misuse of firearms and analyze and discuss the application of criminal sanctions against members of the National Police who misuse firearms.Methods of the Research: Research methods used with normative juridical research type. The problem approach used is the legislation approach, the concept analysis approach, the case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The collection technique is through literature studies and is further analyzed through the way of description using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results showed that in law enforcement against unscrupulous members of the National Police through the application of criminal sanctions in the misuse of firearms through efforts to overcome the misuse of firearms by members of the National Police are grouped into 2 groups, namely repressively and preventively. Repressively, against members of the Police who misuse firearms will be subject to action in the form of disciplinary sanctions and / or criminal sanctions as stipulated in the Criminal Code. Preventive efforts are carried out by tightening psychological tests and mental tests for the right to hold firearms, not allowing members with personal, family or official problems to borrow firearms, and retesting the right to hold firearms for Polri members who hold firearms. The application of criminal sanctions against unscrupulous members of the National Police who misuse firearms resulting in the death of members of the public based on the laws and regulations applicable to unscrupulous members of the National Police is legally processed through a trial process in court and based on the juridical and non-juridical legal considerations of the Judge so that the judge decided that the defendant Markus Manuhutu alias Max alias Maku was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act due to his negligence resulting in the death of another person in accordance with Article 359 of the Criminal Code and imposed a prison sentence on the defendant with a prison sentence of 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2023-04-28 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sanisa/article/view/1540 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sanisa.v3i1.1540 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum; Vol 3, No 1 (2023): Volume 3, Nomor 1, April 2023 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence: SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2023 Philicia Manuhutu, Saartje Sarah Alfons, Denny Latumaerissa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
