Kajian Yuridis Kesaksian Palsu Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v3i2.1891Keywords:
False Testimony, Evidence, CrimeAbstract
Introduction: Evidence is a very decisive factor for judges in making decisions. Witnesses are needed in explaining a case. In giving testimony, witnesses must provide truthful information. In order for witness testimony to be considered valid, it must meet the conditions specified in the Criminal Procedure Code. A statement given under oath where the content contradicts the truth both in a positive sense, namely giving false information (fabricating) or in a negative sense, namely hiding the truth, is also called perjury.
Purposes of the Research: to analyze explaining that false testimony is a crime as well as the mechanism for handling or legal remedies against false testimony in proving a crime.
Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this study is normative juridical. The sources of legal materials are primary and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques are carried out through identification of laws and regulations, legal journals, books.
Results of the Research: the construction of false testimony in the Criminal Code must fulfill the element of testimony that must be under oath. The statement must be required by law or according to regulations that determine the legal consequences of said statement, the statement must be false (incorrect) and this falsehood is known to the giver of the statement. Second, proving the act of justifying false testimony in criminal procedural law can be carried out if the witness continues to defend his statement until the witness examination is complete, then a criminal act of perjury occurs which is then supported by a decision stating that the defendant has not been legally and convincingly proven and the judge orders the defendant to immediately released from custody so that this will become the subject of a new case that can be reported by the defendant's lawyer or the defendant himself
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Abdul Hakim G. Nusantara, et al, 1986,KUHAP dan Peraturan-peraturan Pelaksana, Djambatan, Jakarta,
Andi Hamzah, 1984, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, Penerbit Chalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Deassy J.A .Hehanussa 2022, Tindak Pidana dalam KUHP, PT. Widina, Bandung,
Deassy J.A. Hehanussa dkk,2017 Penanganan tindak pidana perdagangan orang di provinsi Maluku,Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Vol.2.No.1
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, 1984, Komentar atas KUHAP: Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha
Munir Fuady, 2006, Teori Hukum Pembuktian (Pidana dan Perdata), PT. Citra Adytia Bakti, Bandung,
Mukti Arto, Praktek perkara pada pengadilan Agama, Yogyakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2006,
Sudrajat Bassar, 1984,Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Remaja Karya, Bandung,
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Christi Marvel Latupeirissa, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
