Akibat Hukum Penetapan Tersangka Terhadap Orang Mati Dalam Proses Penyidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3017Keywords:
Suspect, Investigation, Legal ConsequencesAbstract
Introduction: The research in this thesis is motivated by the determination of suspects regarding dead people. In Article 109 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, investigators must pay attention to the provisions regarding disclosure of investigations if the suspect dies. Legally, Article 77 of the Criminal Code states "the authority to demand abolition if the accused has died". the goal to be achieved is to analyze and explain whether a dead person can be designated as a suspect as well as analyze and explain the legal consequences of determining a dead person as a suspect.
Purposes of the Research: The goal to be achieved is to analyze and explain whether a dead person can be designated as a suspect as well as analyze and explain the legal consequences of determining a dead person as a suspect.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research or research to find legal rules with the approach used by the author in discussing this problem is the statutory approach.
Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The result obtained in this writing is that the determination of a dead person as a suspect is invalid because it has violated the criminal procedural law. The legal consequences of naming 6 members of the FPI laskar and Hasya Atallah as suspects will have an impact on the good name of the suspect and also the victim's family, and efforts can be made to compensate the suspect, who can be represented by his family
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Adrianto S. Kader, Pemeriksaan Tersangka Oleh Penyidik Berdasarkan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, (2014), Vol. 02, No. 02. [2] Andi Muhammad Sofyan, dkk, Hukum Acara Pidana, Kencana, Jakarta, 2014. [3] Chandra hamzah, Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Bukti Permulaan yang cukup, PSHK, Jakarta, 2014. [4] Didik Endro Purwoleksono, Didik Endro Purwoleksono, Hukum Pidana, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 2014. [5] Ekaputra, Mohammad, & Abdul Khair, Sistem Pidana Di Dalam KUHP dan Pengaturannya Menurut Konsep KUHP Baru, Medan : USU Press, 2010. [6] Erwin Asmadi, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Sebagai Saksi dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana, Jurnal Kajian Hukum Iuris Studia, (2020), Vol. 01, No.02. [7] Johana Olivia Rumajar, Alasan Pemberhentian Penyidikan Suatu Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Lex Crimen, (2014), Vol.03, No.04, hlm 95. [8] Nalom K. Barlyan, Penetapan Tersangka & Praperadilan, Cet. I, Rajawali Pers, Depok, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alfred Gilbert Serlaloy, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, Anna Maria Salamor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
