Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019Keywords:
Implementation of Decisions and Child CustodyAbstract
Introduction: The implementation of child custody decisions made by the Ternate Religious Court is in accordance with the positive law applicable in Indonesia, namely Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage and the compilation of Islamic law (KHI).
Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the implementation of child custody decisions regarding the Ternate Religious Court Decision Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte and what obstacles the Ternate Religious Court faces in the process of implementing the decision.
Methods of the Research: This type of research is normative law.
Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results obtained in writing this are; 1. Article 105 KHI explains that the right to custody of children under 12 years of age is the right of the mother, so the judge in the Ternate religious court in a decision with Register Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte dated 18 November 2020 granted the plaintiff's claim. and giving custody of the child (hadlannah) to the Plaintiff and in accordance with article 98 of the Compilation of Islamic Law regarding material care procedures, the defendant must pay for the child's education until the age of 21 years. 2. There are several obstacles in implementing the Decision with Register Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte, namely: a. The Respondent to the execution does not want to hand over the child to the Petitioner for the execution; b. The applicant for execution deliberately obstructed the execution, by threatening to carry out acts of violence if the child was taken by force; c. The child was deliberately hidden by the Respondent to the execution; d. The child himself did not want to accompany the Petitioner in the execution
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Djamanat Samosir, HUKUM ACARA PERDATA Tahap-Tahap Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata, (Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2011). [2] Fara Divana, Pelaksanaan eksekusi dalam perkara perdata di pengadilan negeri pamekasan, http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/PPKN/article/view/6210, diakses 19 Juni 2015. [3] M. Nur Rasaid, Hukum Acara Perdata, cet. III, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset, 2003). [4] M. Yahya Harahap. 1993. Ruang lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Ctk. Pertama, PT. Gramedia, Jakarta. [5] Moh. Taufik Makarao, Pokok-pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, cet. I, (Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2004). [6] Riduan Syahrani, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum,(Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999). [7] Rokiah Mustaring, “Eksekusi Putusan Hadhanah, Teori dan Problematikanya”, Pengadilan Agama Manado, 20 Juni 2023, https://pa-manado.go.id/eksekusi-putusan-hadhanah-teori-dan- problematikanya/ [8] Umul khair, Pelaksanaan Hak Asuh Setelah Terjadinya Perceraian, JCH (Jurnal Cendakia Hukum) Volume 5 Nomor 2, Maret 2020. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh. [9] Wildan Sayuthi Mustofa. 2002. Pemecahan permasalahan Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama, Ctk. Pertama, PT. Tatanusa, Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laras Ayu, Barzah Latupono, Sabri Fataruba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
