1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 2 (2024)
  3. Ayu

Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA

Laras Ayu(1email), Barzah Latupono(2), Sabri Fataruba(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: The implementation of child custody decisions made by the Ternate Religious Court is in accordance with the positive law applicable in Indonesia, namely Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage and the compilation of Islamic law (KHI).

Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the implementation of child custody decisions regarding the Ternate Religious Court Decision Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte and what obstacles the Ternate Religious Court faces in the process of implementing the decision.

Methods of the Research: This type of research is normative law.

Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results obtained in writing this  are; 1. Article 105 KHI explains that the right to custody of children under 12 years of age is the right of the mother, so the judge in the Ternate religious court in a decision with Register Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte dated 18 November 2020 granted the plaintiff's claim. and giving custody of the child (hadlannah) to the Plaintiff and in accordance with article 98 of the Compilation of Islamic Law regarding material care procedures, the defendant must pay for the child's education until the age of 21 years. 2. There are several obstacles in implementing the Decision with Register Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte, namely: a. The Respondent to the execution does not want to hand over the child to the Petitioner for the execution; b. The applicant for execution deliberately obstructed the execution, by threatening to carry out acts of violence if the child was taken by force; c. The child was deliberately hidden by the Respondent to the execution; d. The child himself did not want to accompany the Petitioner in the execution


Keywords


Implementation of Decisions and Child Custody


DOI


10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019

Published


2024-10-31

How To Cite


APA: Ayu, L., Latupono, B., & Fataruba, S. (2024). Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA. SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, 4(2), 84–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019.
IEEE: L. Ayu, B. Latupono, and S. Fataruba, "Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA", SANISA J. Kreativitas Mhs. Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 84–94, Oct. 2024. Accessed on: May. 2, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019
Harvard: Ayu, L., Latupono, B., and Fataruba, S., (2024). "Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA". SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, Volume 4(2), pp. 84–94. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019 (Accessed on: 2 May 2025)
Chicago: Ayu, Laras, Barzah Latupono, and Sabri Fataruba. "Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA." SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum 4, no. 2 (October 31, 2024): 84–94. Accessed May 2, 2025. doi:10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019
Vancouver: Ayu L, Latupono B, Fataruba S. Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA. SANISA J. Kreativitas Mhs. Huk. [Internet]. 2024 Oct 31 [cited 2025 May 2];4(2):84–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019
MLA 8th: Ayu, Laras, Barzah Latupono, and Sabri Fataruba. "Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA." SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, vol. 4, no. 2, 31 Oct. 2024, pp. 84–94, doi:10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019. Accessed 2 May. 2025.
BibTeX: 
@article{sanisa3019,
		author = {Laras Ayu and Barzah Latupono and Sabri Fataruba},
		title = {Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA},
		journal = {SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum},
		volume = {4},
		number = {2},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Implementation of Decisions and Child Custody},
		abstract = {Introduction: The implementation of child custody decisions made by the Ternate Religious Court is in accordance with the positive law applicable in Indonesia, namely Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage and the compilation of Islamic law (KHI).Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the implementation of child custody decisions regarding the Ternate Religious Court Decision Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte and what obstacles the Ternate Religious Court faces in the process of implementing the decision. Methods of the Research: This type of research is normative law.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results obtained in writing this  are; 1. Article 105 KHI explains that the right to custody of children under 12 years of age is the right of the mother, so the judge in the Ternate religious court in a decision with Register Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte dated 18 November 2020 granted the plaintiff's claim. and giving custody of the child (hadlannah) to the Plaintiff and in accordance with article 98 of the Compilation of Islamic Law regarding material care procedures, the defendant must pay for the child's education until the age of 21 years. 2. There are several obstacles in implementing the Decision with Register Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte, namely: a. The Respondent to the execution does not want to hand over the child to the Petitioner for the execution; b. The applicant for execution deliberately obstructed the execution, by threatening to carry out acts of violence if the child was taken by force; c. The child was deliberately hidden by the Respondent to the execution; d. The child himself did not want to accompany the Petitioner in the execution},
				issn = {2776-2289},		pages = {84--94}			doi = {10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sanisa/article/view/3019}
		}
RefWorks:

   

Djamanat Samosir, HUKUM ACARA PERDATA Tahap-Tahap Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata, (Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2011). [2] Fara Divana, Pelaksanaan eksekusi dalam perkara perdata di pengadilan negeri pamekasan, http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/PPKN/article/view/6210, diakses 19 Juni 2015. [3] M. Nur Rasaid, Hukum Acara Perdata, cet. III, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset, 2003). [4] M. Yahya Harahap. 1993. Ruang lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Ctk. Pertama, PT. Gramedia, Jakarta. [5] Moh. Taufik Makarao, Pokok-pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, cet. I, (Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2004). [6] Riduan Syahrani, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum,(Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999). [7] Rokiah Mustaring, “Eksekusi Putusan Hadhanah, Teori dan Problematikanya”, Pengadilan Agama Manado, 20 Juni 2023, https://pa-manado.go.id/eksekusi-putusan-hadhanah-teori-dan- problematikanya/ [8] Umul khair, Pelaksanaan Hak Asuh Setelah Terjadinya Perceraian, JCH (Jurnal Cendakia Hukum) Volume 5 Nomor 2, Maret 2020. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh. [9] Wildan Sayuthi Mustofa. 2002. Pemecahan permasalahan Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama, Ctk. Pertama, PT. Tatanusa, Jakarta.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 25 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 24 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Pelaksanaan Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Dan Kepastian Hukumnya Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Laras Ayu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Barzah Latupono; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Sabri Fataruba; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Implementation of Decisions and Child Custody
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: The implementation of child custody decisions made by the Ternate Religious Court is in accordance with the positive law applicable in Indonesia, namely Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage and the compilation of Islamic law (KHI).Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the implementation of child custody decisions regarding the Ternate Religious Court Decision Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte and what obstacles the Ternate Religious Court faces in the process of implementing the decision. Methods of the Research: This type of research is normative law.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results obtained in writing this  are; 1. Article 105 KHI explains that the right to custody of children under 12 years of age is the right of the mother, so the judge in the Ternate religious court in a decision with Register Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte dated 18 November 2020 granted the plaintiff's claim. and giving custody of the child (hadlannah) to the Plaintiff and in accordance with article 98 of the Compilation of Islamic Law regarding material care procedures, the defendant must pay for the child's education until the age of 21 years. 2. There are several obstacles in implementing the Decision with Register Number 623/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte, namely: a. The Respondent to the execution does not want to hand over the child to the Petitioner for the execution; b. The applicant for execution deliberately obstructed the execution, by threatening to carry out acts of violence if the child was taken by force; c. The child was deliberately hidden by the Respondent to the execution; d. The child himself did not want to accompany the Petitioner in the execution
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2024-10-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sanisa/article/view/3019
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/sanisa.v4i2.3019
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum; Vol 4, No 2 (2024): Volume 4, Nomor 2, Oktober 2024
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

 

Licence: SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..


Copyright (c) 2024 Laras Ayu, Barzah Latupono, Sabri Fataruba

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.