Ketidakadilan Pengaturan Dana Bagi Hasil Perikanan

Yohanes Pattinasarany

doi:10.47268/sanisa.v6i1.3914

Authors

Yohanes Pattinasarany Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v6i1.3914

Keywords:

Injustice, Funds, Sharing, Fishery Results

Abstract

Introduction: The state has determined the percentage of Revenue Sharing Funds (hereinafter abbreviated as DBH) from state revenues from the management of fisheries natural resources between the central government and regional governments through the provisions of Article 119 of Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central and Regional Governments. 20% (twenty percent) is the central government's share, and 80% (eighty percent) is the regional share. The 80% (eighty percent) of the regional share is divided among all regencies/cities and provinces that are not divided into autonomous districts/cities in Indonesia.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the inequities in the regulation of Revenue Sharing Funds for fisheries resource management for producing provinces. The research method used is normative legal research

Methods of the Research: The research method used in this paper is normative legal research, which primarily examines positive law provisions, legal principles, and legal doctrines to address the legal issues at hand. The approaches used are the statutory approach and the conceptual approach.

Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results show that 80% (eighty percent) of the fisheries DBH regulation, which is the regional share, is divided among all regencies/cities and provinces that are not divided into autonomous districts/cities in Indonesia. This indicates that producing provinces do not receive a share of the fisheries DBH distribution. However, districts/cities are not given the authority to manage fishery natural resources. Such a distribution, which excludes producing provinces like Maluku Province, is considered unfair. This differs from the regulation of the Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH) for natural resources in the forestry, mineral and coal, oil and gas, and geothermal sectors. The regulation of the fishery DBH should use a contribution approach to the results obtained from fisheries management activities. This means that the distribution is carried out proportionally as a manifestation of distributive justice in the distribution of the fishery DBH. The regulation of the fishery DBH distribution is adaptive according to the contribution of revenue from the fisheries sector generated by the region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Ahmad Yani, Hubungan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah di Indonesia, RajaGrafino Persada, 2023, Jakarta.

Amin Nasrun Renur, dkk. Blue economic in Maluku Province, Indonesia: where do we start, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 517 (2020) 01200

Carl Joachim Friedrich, “Filsafat Hukum Perspektif Historis, Nuansa dan Nusamedia, 2004. Bandung.

Hamid, Edi Suandi, Ketimpangan Fiskal Vertikal dan Formula Alternatif Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU), Disertasi UGM (tidak dipublikasikan), 2003, Yogyakarta.

Lamijan dan Wiwoho, J, Upah Kerja dan Keadilan, Suatu Tinjauan Teoretis, Pena Persada Redaksi, 2021, Jakarta.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad, Ekonomi Pembangunan, Teori, Masalah dan Kebijakan, UPP AMP YKPN, 2000, Yogyakarta.

M. Khoirul Muluk, Desentralisasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah, Bayumedia Publishing, 2007, Malang.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Tentang Hubungan Keuangan Antara Pemernitah Pusat dan Pemerintahan Daerah.