Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)

Yohanis Egi Pedan; Sherly Adam; Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa

doi:10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)

Yohanis Egi Pedan⁽¹⁾, Sherly Adam⁽²⁾, Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are a stage in which the panel of judges comprehensively assesses the facts revealed during the trial process based on legal and non-legal considerations as the basis for a decision that embodies the value of justice.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the legal considerations of judges in acquittal verdicts for criminal homicide in verdict number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby and to analyze and discuss acquittal verdicts for perpetrators of criminal homicide from the perspective of the objectives of criminal punishment.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research using a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The procedure for collecting legal materials is carried out through literature study, processed through editing, systematization, and qualitative analysis.

Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of the study show that the judge's legal considerations regarding the perpetrator of the crime of murder in decision number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby, based on the judge's legal considerations of all elements of the alternative charges under Article 338 of the Criminal Code, Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code, Article 359 of the Criminal Code, and Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which were brought by the public prosecutor against the defendant Gregorius Ronald Tannnur, were not legally proven. The reason for this was that the judge was convinced by the opinion of a driving safety expert that the victim was outside the lane of the car driven by the defendant and, based on CCTV footage that did not clearly show that the victim died as a result of murder or being run over by the defendant's car, the judge acquitted the defendant. An acquittal of a perpetrator of a criminal act of murder is contrary to the purpose of punishment if it is not based on strong evidence. If an acquittal is given because the judge was not careful in examining the evidence and witnesses or for other reasons that are not in accordance with the law, then this verdict can be considered unfair and can reduce public trust in the judicial system to provide justice and protect the community

Keywords

Acquittal; Criminal Act of Murder

DOI

10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

Published

2025-12-23

How To Cite

APA: Pedan, Y.E., Adam, S., & Latupeirissa, J.E. (2025). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby). SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, 5(2), 73–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662.

IEEE: Y.E. Pedan, S. Adam, and J.E. Latupeirissa, "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)", SANISA J. Kreativitas Mhs. Huk., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73–84, Dec. 2025. Accessed on: Dec. 24, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

Harvard: Pedan, Y.E., Adam, S., and Latupeirissa, J.E., (2025). "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)". SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, Volume 5(2), pp. 73–84. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662 (Accessed on: 24 December 2025)

Chicago: Pedan, Yohanis Egi, Sherly Adam, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)." SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum 5, no. 2 (December 23, 2025): 73–84. Accessed December 24, 2025. doi:10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

Vancouver: Pedan YE, Adam S, Latupeirissa JE. Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby). SANISA J. Kreativitas Mhs. Huk. [Internet]. 2025 Dec 23 [cited 2025 Dec 24];5(2):73–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

MLA 8th: Pedan, Yohanis Egi, Sherly Adam, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)." SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, vol. 5, no. 2, 23 Dec. 2025, pp. 73–84, doi:10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662. Accessed 24 Dec. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{sanisa3662,
		author = {Yohanis Pedan and Sherly Adam and Julianus Latupeirissa},
		title = {Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)},
		journal = {SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum},
		volume = {5},
		number = {2},
		year = {2025},
		keywords = {Acquittal; Criminal Act of Murder},
		abstract = {Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are a stage in which the panel of judges comprehensively assesses the facts revealed during the trial process based on legal and non-legal considerations as the basis for a decision that embodies the value of justice.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the legal considerations of judges in acquittal verdicts for criminal homicide in verdict number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby and to analyze and discuss acquittal verdicts for perpetrators of criminal homicide from the perspective of the objectives of criminal punishment.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research using a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The procedure for collecting legal materials is carried out through literature study, processed through editing, systematization, and qualitative analysis.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of the study show that the judge's legal considerations regarding the perpetrator of the crime of murder in decision number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby, based on the judge's legal considerations of all elements of the alternative charges under Article 338 of the Criminal Code, Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code, Article 359 of the Criminal Code, and Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which were brought by the public prosecutor against the defendant Gregorius Ronald Tannnur, were not legally proven. The reason for this was that the judge was convinced by the opinion of a driving safety expert that the victim was outside the lane of the car driven by the defendant and, based on CCTV footage that did not clearly show that the victim died as a result of murder or being run over by the defendant's car, the judge acquitted the defendant. An acquittal of a perpetrator of a criminal act of murder is contrary to the purpose of punishment if it is not based on strong evidence. If an acquittal is given because the judge was not careful in examining the evidence and witnesses or for other reasons that are not in accordance with the law, then this verdict can be considered unfair and can reduce public trust in the judicial system to provide justice and protect the community},
				issn = {2776-2289},		pages = {73--84}			doi = {10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sanisa/article/view/3662}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Amir Minarbi, Beban Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, Ruang Karya Bersama, Banjar, Kalimantan Selatan, 2023.

Dharmawan, A.R., Ramadanti, N.K, Pidana Alternatif Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Kaitannya dengan Tujuan Pemidanaan, Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik, Vol. 1 No. 4, 2024.

Fence M. Wantu, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, Reviva Cendikia, Yogyakarta, 2019.

Harrys Pratama Teguh dkk, Dinamika Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia, Ruang Karya, Banjar,Kalimantan Selatan, 2024.

Henny Saida Flora dkk, Hukum Pidana Di Era Digital, CV. Rey Media Grafika, Batam, 2024.

Julianus E. Latupeirissa, Deasy J.A. Hehanussa, Patrick Corputty, Victim Precipitation Sebagai Pertimbangan Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana (Kajian Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana), Jurnal Belo, Vol. 7 No. 1, 2021.

Koesparmono Irsan, Panduan Memahami Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Pidana, Gramata Publishing, Bekasi, 2016.

Kurniawati, S., Putusan Bebas Terhadap Pelaku Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Tinjaun Hukum Islam ( Analisis Putusan No. 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby ), Bachelor’s Thesis, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Messy Rivelya Hape dan Selfianus Laritmas, Analisis Hukum Pidana Tambahan Kebiri Kimia Pasal 81 Ayat 7 Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Tujuan Pemidanaan, INNOVATIVE : Journal Of Social Science Research, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2023.

Mochamad Januar Rizki, Mengenali Konsep Baru Jenis Pemidanaan dalam KUHP Nasional, Hukum Online, 28 April 2024, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengenali-konsep-baru-jenis-pemidanaan-dalam-kuhp-nasional-lt662de997a2036/?page=2

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 1466 K/Pid/2024

Rusli Muhammad, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2007.

Samsul Susilawati, Pembelajaran moral Dan Desain Pembelajaran Moral, Pustaka Egaliter, Yogyakarta, 2020.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum : Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2005.

Sherly Adam, Koordinasi Kelembagaan dalam Penenggelaman Kapal Hasil Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan, SASI, Vol. 26 No. 1, 2020.

Tim Literasi Nusantara, KUHAP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana), PT. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup, Malang, 2022.

Yuliana, M., Adam, S., & Latumaerissa, D., Peran Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat bukti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Bersama (Studi Putusan No. 348/Pid. B/2021/PN. Amb), PATTIMURA Law Study Review, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2023.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 0 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 0 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Yohanis Egi Pedan; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Sherly Adam; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Acquittal; Criminal Act of Murder

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are a stage in which the panel of judges comprehensively assesses the facts revealed during the trial process based on legal and non-legal considerations as the basis for a decision that embodies the value of justice.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the legal considerations of judges in acquittal verdicts for criminal homicide in verdict number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby and to analyze and discuss acquittal verdicts for perpetrators of criminal homicide from the perspective of the objectives of criminal punishment.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research using a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The procedure for collecting legal materials is carried out through literature study, processed through editing, systematization, and qualitative analysis.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of the study show that the judge's legal considerations regarding the perpetrator of the crime of murder in decision number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby, based on the judge's legal considerations of all elements of the alternative charges under Article 338 of the Criminal Code, Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code, Article 359 of the Criminal Code, and Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which were brought by the public prosecutor against the defendant Gregorius Ronald Tannnur, were not legally proven. The reason for this was that the judge was convinced by the opinion of a driving safety expert that the victim was outside the lane of the car driven by the defendant and, based on CCTV footage that did not clearly show that the victim died as a result of murder or being run over by the defendant's car, the judge acquitted the defendant. An acquittal of a perpetrator of a criminal act of murder is contrary to the purpose of punishment if it is not based on strong evidence. If an acquittal is given because the judge was not careful in examining the evidence and witnesses or for other reasons that are not in accordance with the law, then this verdict can be considered unfair and can reduce public trust in the judicial system to provide justice and protect the community

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2025-12-23

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sanisa/article/view/3662

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum; Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Oktober 2025 (in progress)

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Licence: SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..