Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby)

Yohanis Egi Pedan; Sherly Adam; Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa

doi:10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

Authors

Yohanis Egi Pedan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
Sherly Adam Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6766-5014 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

Keywords:

Acquittal, Criminal Act of Murder

Abstract

Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are a stage in which the panel of judges comprehensively assesses the facts revealed during the trial process based on legal and non-legal considerations as the basis for a decision that embodies the value of justice.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the legal considerations of judges in acquittal verdicts for criminal homicide in verdict number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby and to analyze and discuss acquittal verdicts for perpetrators of criminal homicide from the perspective of the objectives of criminal punishment.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research using a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The procedure for collecting legal materials is carried out through literature study, processed through editing, systematization, and qualitative analysis.

Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of the study show that the judge's legal considerations regarding the perpetrator of the crime of murder in decision number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby, based on the judge's legal considerations of all elements of the alternative charges under Article 338 of the Criminal Code, Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code, Article 359 of the Criminal Code, and Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which were brought by the public prosecutor against the defendant Gregorius Ronald Tannnur, were not legally proven. The reason for this was that the judge was convinced by the opinion of a driving safety expert that the victim was outside the lane of the car driven by the defendant and, based on CCTV footage that did not clearly show that the victim died as a result of murder or being run over by the defendant's car, the judge acquitted the defendant. An acquittal of a perpetrator of a criminal act of murder is contrary to the purpose of punishment if it is not based on strong evidence. If an acquittal is given because the judge was not careful in examining the evidence and witnesses or for other reasons that are not in accordance with the law, then this verdict can be considered unfair and can reduce public trust in the judicial system to provide justice and protect the community

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Amir Minarbi, Beban Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, Ruang Karya Bersama, Banjar, Kalimantan Selatan, 2023.

Dharmawan, A.R., Ramadanti, N.K, Pidana Alternatif Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Kaitannya dengan Tujuan Pemidanaan, Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik, Vol. 1 No. 4, 2024.

Fence M. Wantu, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, Reviva Cendikia, Yogyakarta, 2019.

Harrys Pratama Teguh dkk, Dinamika Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia, Ruang Karya, Banjar,Kalimantan Selatan, 2024.

Henny Saida Flora dkk, Hukum Pidana Di Era Digital, CV. Rey Media Grafika, Batam, 2024.

Julianus E. Latupeirissa, Deasy J.A. Hehanussa, Patrick Corputty, Victim Precipitation Sebagai Pertimbangan Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana (Kajian Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana), Jurnal Belo, Vol. 7 No. 1, 2021.

Koesparmono Irsan, Panduan Memahami Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Pidana, Gramata Publishing, Bekasi, 2016.

Kurniawati, S., Putusan Bebas Terhadap Pelaku Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Tinjaun Hukum Islam ( Analisis Putusan No. 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby ), Bachelor’s Thesis, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Messy Rivelya Hape dan Selfianus Laritmas, Analisis Hukum Pidana Tambahan Kebiri Kimia Pasal 81 Ayat 7 Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Tujuan Pemidanaan, INNOVATIVE : Journal Of Social Science Research, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2023.

Mochamad Januar Rizki, Mengenali Konsep Baru Jenis Pemidanaan dalam KUHP Nasional, Hukum Online, 28 April 2024, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengenali-konsep-baru-jenis-pemidanaan-dalam-kuhp-nasional-lt662de997a2036/?page=2

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 1466 K/Pid/2024

Rusli Muhammad, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2007.

Samsul Susilawati, Pembelajaran moral Dan Desain Pembelajaran Moral, Pustaka Egaliter, Yogyakarta, 2020.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum : Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2005.

Sherly Adam, Koordinasi Kelembagaan dalam Penenggelaman Kapal Hasil Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan, SASI, Vol. 26 No. 1, 2020.

Tim Literasi Nusantara, KUHAP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana), PT. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup, Malang, 2022.

Yuliana, M., Adam, S., & Latumaerissa, D., Peran Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat bukti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Bersama (Studi Putusan No. 348/Pid. B/2021/PN. Amb), PATTIMURA Law Study Review, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2023.