Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques

Sabela Gayo(1email)


(1) Faculty of Law Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Jakarta, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: In resolving ordinary maritime disputes related to national borders, from several types of dispute resolution, mediation is the right way to resolve disputes involving third parties.

Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to find out that in resolving martim aurann disputes the law is contained in international law, namely UNCLOS 1982 which regulates martim disputes.

Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative juridical with analysis using legal documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.

Results of the Research: Alternative settlement of territorial boundary disputes can be done by, first, referring to UNCLOS 1982 through Bilateral Mutual Agreement in drawing a temporary line (equidistant line) using the equity principle and considering relevant factors and the possibility of modifying the equidistant line with the diplomatic approach of both countries, second, through the ASEAN mechanism, and. third, through the mechanism of the International Court of justice by promoting equitable principles and relevant circumstances.However, resolving with the second alternative is more appropriate because it can use mediation methods in maritime dispute resolution.

Keywords


Mediation; Maritime; Dispute.


DOI


10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477

Published


2023-09-22

How To Cite


APA: Gayo, S. (2023). Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques. SASI, 29(3), 589-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477.
IEEE: S. Gayo, "Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques", SASI, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 589-595, Sep. 2023. Accessed on: Nov. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477
Harvard: Gayo, S., (2023). "Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques". SASI, Volume 29(3), pp. 589-595. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477 (Accessed on: 21 November 2024)
Chicago: Gayo, Sabela. "Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques." SASI 29, no. 3 (June 12, 2023): 589-595. Accessed November 21, 2024. doi:10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477
Vancouver: Gayo S. Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques. SASI [Internet]. 2023 Sep 22 [cited 2024 Nov 21];29(3):589-595. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477
MLA 8th: Gayo, Sabela. "Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques." SASI, vol. 29, no. 3, 12 Jun. 2023, pp. 589-595, doi:10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{SASI1477,
		author = {Sabela Gayo},
		title = {Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {29},
		number = {3},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Mediation; Maritime; Dispute.},
		abstract = {Introduction: In resolving ordinary maritime disputes related to national borders, from several types of dispute resolution, mediation is the right way to resolve disputes involving third parties.Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to find out that in resolving martim aurann disputes the law is contained in international law, namely UNCLOS 1982 which regulates martim disputes.Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative juridical with analysis using legal documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.Results of the Research: Alternative settlement of territorial boundary disputes can be done by, first, referring to UNCLOS 1982 through Bilateral Mutual Agreement in drawing a temporary line (equidistant line) using the equity principle and considering relevant factors and the possibility of modifying the equidistant line with the diplomatic approach of both countries, second, through the ASEAN mechanism, and. third, through the mechanism of the International Court of justice by promoting equitable principles and relevant circumstances.However, resolving with the second alternative is more appropriate because it can use mediation methods in maritime dispute resolution.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {589--595}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1477}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Journal Article

A, M. Fauzi, and Syafri Harto. “Kepentingan Amerika Serikat Dalam Upaya Memperbaiki Hubungan Bilateral Jepang-Korea Selatan Pasca Distorsi Sejarah.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik 1, no. 2 (2014): 1–15.

Adhipratama, Farrel Fawzi, and Ida Bagus Wyasa Putra. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Sebagai Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Maritim Antara Yunani Dan Turki.” Kertha Desa 9, no. 10 (2021): 25–38.

Masfiani, Ismi Yulia, L. Tri Setyawanta R, and Nanik Trihastuti. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Maritim Antara Costa Rica Dan Nicaragua Di Laut Karibia Dan Samudra Pasifik Dalam Perspektif UNCLOS 1982.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2016): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.12898.

Nauli, Putriana Septi, and Stivani Ismawira Sinambela. “Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Demimitasi Batas Maritim, Diwilayah Greater Sunrise Antar Timor Leste Dan Australia Dari Perspektif Kajian Hukum International.” Jurnal PIR: Power in International Relations 6, no. 1 (2021): 80–94. https://doi.org/10.22303/pir.6.1.2021.94-108.

Novianto, Rizal Dwi, Dimas Agung Firmansyah, and Naufal Adi Pratama. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Laut Natuna Utara.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 1, no. 1 (2010): 69–78.

OnumaYasuaki. “International Law in and with International Politics : The Function of InternationalLaw in International Society.” European Journal of International Law 14, no. 1 (2003): 105–39

Setiawati, Novi, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, and Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepulauan Dalam Perspektif Hukum International.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 2, no. 3 (2019): 168–80. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v2i3.28782.

Syafitri, Utami Gita. “Sengketa Pulau Dokdo Antara Jepang Dan Korea Selatan.” Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI 2, no. 2 (2012): 639–52.

Udiani, Made Chintya Sastri, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, and Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini. “Hukum Internasional Sebagai Sumber Hukum Di Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Internasional.” Ganesha Law Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 73–83.

Book

Adolf, Huala. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Arsana, I Made Andi. Batas Maritim Antar Negara. Suatu Tinjauan Teknis Dan Yuridis. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2007.

Churchill, R, and A Lowe. The Law of The Sea. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.

Hadiwijoyo, Suryo Sakti. Batas Wilayah Negara Indonesia: Dimensi Permasalahan Dan Strategi Penanganan. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2009.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006.

Thesis, Web Page, and Others

Paramitha, Fauzia Dyah Ayu. “Strategi Jepang Dan Korea Selatan Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Teritorial Pulau Takeshima/Dokdo.” Skripsi: Universitas Airlangga, 2023.

Sefriani. Hukum Internasional: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 603 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 290 times



Copyright (c) 2023 Sabela Gayo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.