Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques
(1) Faculty of Law Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: In resolving ordinary maritime disputes related to national borders, from several types of dispute resolution, mediation is the right way to resolve disputes involving third parties.
Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to find out that in resolving martim aurann disputes the law is contained in international law, namely UNCLOS 1982 which regulates martim disputes.
Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative juridical with analysis using legal documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.
Results of the Research: Alternative settlement of territorial boundary disputes can be done by, first, referring to UNCLOS 1982 through Bilateral Mutual Agreement in drawing a temporary line (equidistant line) using the equity principle and considering relevant factors and the possibility of modifying the equidistant line with the diplomatic approach of both countries, second, through the ASEAN mechanism, and. third, through the mechanism of the International Court of justice by promoting equitable principles and relevant circumstances.However, resolving with the second alternative is more appropriate because it can use mediation methods in maritime dispute resolution.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477
Published
2023-09-22
How To Cite
@article{SASI1477, author = {Sabela Gayo}, title = {Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques}, journal = {SASI}, volume = {29}, number = {3}, year = {2023}, keywords = {Mediation; Maritime; Dispute.}, abstract = {Introduction: In resolving ordinary maritime disputes related to national borders, from several types of dispute resolution, mediation is the right way to resolve disputes involving third parties.Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to find out that in resolving martim aurann disputes the law is contained in international law, namely UNCLOS 1982 which regulates martim disputes.Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative juridical with analysis using legal documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.Results of the Research: Alternative settlement of territorial boundary disputes can be done by, first, referring to UNCLOS 1982 through Bilateral Mutual Agreement in drawing a temporary line (equidistant line) using the equity principle and considering relevant factors and the possibility of modifying the equidistant line with the diplomatic approach of both countries, second, through the ASEAN mechanism, and. third, through the mechanism of the International Court of justice by promoting equitable principles and relevant circumstances.However, resolving with the second alternative is more appropriate because it can use mediation methods in maritime dispute resolution.}, issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {589--595} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1477} }
Journal Article
A, M. Fauzi, and Syafri Harto. “Kepentingan Amerika Serikat Dalam Upaya Memperbaiki Hubungan Bilateral Jepang-Korea Selatan Pasca Distorsi Sejarah.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik 1, no. 2 (2014): 1–15.
Adhipratama, Farrel Fawzi, and Ida Bagus Wyasa Putra. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Sebagai Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Maritim Antara Yunani Dan Turki.” Kertha Desa 9, no. 10 (2021): 25–38.
Masfiani, Ismi Yulia, L. Tri Setyawanta R, and Nanik Trihastuti. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Maritim Antara Costa Rica Dan Nicaragua Di Laut Karibia Dan Samudra Pasifik Dalam Perspektif UNCLOS 1982.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2016): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.12898.
Nauli, Putriana Septi, and Stivani Ismawira Sinambela. “Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Demimitasi Batas Maritim, Diwilayah Greater Sunrise Antar Timor Leste Dan Australia Dari Perspektif Kajian Hukum International.” Jurnal PIR: Power in International Relations 6, no. 1 (2021): 80–94. https://doi.org/10.22303/pir.6.1.2021.94-108.
Novianto, Rizal Dwi, Dimas Agung Firmansyah, and Naufal Adi Pratama. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Laut Natuna Utara.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 1, no. 1 (2010): 69–78.
OnumaYasuaki. “International Law in and with International Politics : The Function of InternationalLaw in International Society.” European Journal of International Law 14, no. 1 (2003): 105–39
Setiawati, Novi, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, and Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepulauan Dalam Perspektif Hukum International.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 2, no. 3 (2019): 168–80. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v2i3.28782.
Syafitri, Utami Gita. “Sengketa Pulau Dokdo Antara Jepang Dan Korea Selatan.” Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI 2, no. 2 (2012): 639–52.
Udiani, Made Chintya Sastri, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, and Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini. “Hukum Internasional Sebagai Sumber Hukum Di Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Internasional.” Ganesha Law Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 73–83.
Book
Adolf, Huala. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Arsana, I Made Andi. Batas Maritim Antar Negara. Suatu Tinjauan Teknis Dan Yuridis. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2007.
Churchill, R, and A Lowe. The Law of The Sea. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.
Hadiwijoyo, Suryo Sakti. Batas Wilayah Negara Indonesia: Dimensi Permasalahan Dan Strategi Penanganan. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2009.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006.
Thesis, Web Page, and Others
Paramitha, Fauzia Dyah Ayu. “Strategi Jepang Dan Korea Selatan Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Teritorial Pulau Takeshima/Dokdo.” Skripsi: Universitas Airlangga, 2023.
Sefriani. Hukum Internasional: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.Copyright (c) 2023 Sabela Gayo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.