Kekuatan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Terkait Keberatan dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Sebagai Alternative Dispute Resolution dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen
(1) Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Consumer dispute can be resolved by litigation and non-litigation based on agreement of the parties. Presence of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) considered as a new hope for parties because thats’s give an option to resolve consumer dispute, through BPSK it is expected that dispute can be resolved in a simple, fast, and low-cost manner. However, in fact the verdict issued by BPSK has the disadvantage of not having specificity, it caused by the article 54 point 3 of Consumer Protection Law mention that the BPSK decision is final and binding but can still be submitted for objection, even cancellation, then the absence of executorial power on the BPSK decision causes this BPSK decision to have no merit.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v25i2.197
Published
2019-12-27
How To Cite
@article{SASI197, author = {Surya Gunarsa}, title = {Kekuatan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Terkait Keberatan dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Sebagai Alternative Dispute Resolution dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen}, journal = {SASI}, volume = {25}, number = {2}, year = {2019}, keywords = {Arbitration; BPSK; Consumer; Court Decision; Dispute}, abstract = {Consumer dispute can be resolved by litigation and non-litigation based on agreement of the parties. Presence of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) considered as a new hope for parties because thats’s give an option to resolve consumer dispute, through BPSK it is expected that dispute can be resolved in a simple, fast, and low-cost manner. However, in fact the verdict issued by BPSK has the disadvantage of not having specificity, it caused by the article 54 point 3 of Consumer Protection Law mention that the BPSK decision is final and binding but can still be submitted for objection, even cancellation, then the absence of executorial power on the BPSK decision causes this BPSK decision to have no merit.}, issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {160--172} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v25i2.197}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/197} }
Buku
[1] Fuadi, Munir. (2006), Arbitrase Nasional: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
[2] Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (1993), Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesial (Cet. I), Yogyakarta: Liberty.
[3] Nugroho, Susanti Adi. (2008), Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Tinjau dari Hukum Acara serta Kendala Implemen- tasinya, Jakarta: Kencana.
[4] Sudirto, Zaeni Asyhadie. (2004), Mengenai Arbitrase Salah Satu Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
[5] Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamuji, Sri. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
[6] Siahaan, NHT. (2005), “Hukum Konsumen (Perlindungan Konsumen dan Tanggung Jawab Produk)â€, Bogor: Panta Rei.
[7] Winarta, Frans Hendra. (2013), “Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketaâ€, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Jurnal dan Lain-Lain
[8] Andriansyah, Muhammad (2014) “Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Oleh Pengadilan Negeriâ€, Jurnal Cita Hukum. Volume II No. 2.
[9] Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (2005), “Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Dan Menghambat Pelaksanaan Putusan Hakim (eksekusi) dalam Perkara Perdataâ€, Majalah ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Jatiswara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram, Vol.20, No.3, Juli.
[10] Prabowo, Tri Ari dan Nazriyah, R. (2017) “Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014â€, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 14, Nomor 4, Desember.
[11] Putnado, Muhammad Gakhairi. (2017), “Kajian Hukum Pembatalan Putusan BPSK Nomor 11/PTS-BPSK/BKT/X/2015 Atas Upaya Hukum Keberatan Oleh Pihak Pelaku Usaha (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bukittingi Nomor 24/PDT.SUS-BPSK/2015/PN.BKT)â€, Diponegoro Law Journal, Volume 6, Nomor 2.
[12] Rosita. (2017), “Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi)â€, Al-Bayyinah of Islamic Law, Volume IV Nomor 2, Desember, http://dx.doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v1i2.20.
[13] Siallagan, Gabriel. (2013) “Analisis Yuridis Upaya Keberatan Terhadap Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Perlindungan Konsumenâ€Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, Volume 3 Nomor 5.
[14] Wulandari, Bernadetta T. (2006), “BPSK Sebagai Alternatif Upaya Penegakkan Hak Konsumen Di Indonesiaâ€, Gloria Juris, Volume 6 Nomor 2.
[15] Adminbpl, “Ini Alasan Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Menjadi Populer Di Dunia Bisnisâ€, https://bplawyers.co.id/2016/08/29/penyelesaiansengketaarbitrase/.
Cited-By:
1. Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022)
Sam Julius Richard Saroinsong, Joupy Gustav Mambu, Feibe Pijoh, Yan Edoard Rumapar
ISBN: 978-2-494069-35-0 first page: 1890 year: 2023
Type: Book [View Source]
2. Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Secara Alternatif Melewati Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI)
Dewi Ratrika Rinupa Sejati
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies vol: 2 issue: 1 first page: 19 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]
Copyright (c) 2019 Surya Muhammad Gunarsa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022)
Sam Julius Richard Saroinsong, Joupy Gustav Mambu, Feibe Pijoh, Yan Edoard Rumapar
ISBN: 978-2-494069-35-0 first page: 1890 year: 2023
Type: Book [View Source]
2. Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Secara Alternatif Melewati Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI)
Dewi Ratrika Rinupa Sejati
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies vol: 2 issue: 1 first page: 19 year: 2024
Type: Journal [View Source]