Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi


*Herman Katimin - Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
CrossMark

Abstract

The difficulty of capital punishment for perpetrators of corruption, although there are several examples of corruption cases that have fulfilled certain elements of the conditions as Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 20 of 2002 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. To discuss this problem, the research method used is juridical normative relating to certain elements of the state and the amount of state financial losses or the state's economy in determining the death penalty. The results of the discussion included not explaining the specific elements of certain circumstances as a burden for corruptors. In addition, the amount of state financial losses or the country's economy is very important in determining the death penalty is not formulated in certain circumstances. Therefore, it is recommended that specific formulations of certain elements and the amount of state financial losses or state economies that reach billions of up to triulian rupiah be subject to the death penalty.

Keywords

State Financial Losses and State Economy; Corruption; Death Penalty; Certain Circumstances

How To Cite


APA: Katimin, H. (2020). Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi. SASI, 26(1), 39-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210.
IEEE: H. Katimin, "Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi", SASI, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 39-51, May. 2020. Accessed on: Apr. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210
Harvard: Katimin, H., (2020). "Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi". SASI, Volume 26(1), pp. 39-51. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210 (Accessed on: 19 April 2021)
Chicago: Katimin, Herman. "Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi." SASI 26, no. 1 (May 19, 2020): 39-51. Accessed April 19, 2021. doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210
Vancouver: Katimin H. Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi. SASI [Internet]. 2020 May 19 [cited 2021 Apr 19];26(1):39-51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210
MLA 8th: Katimin, Herman. "Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi." SASI, vol. 26, no. 1, 19 May. 2020, pp. 39-51, doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210. Accessed 19 Apr. 2021.
BibTeX:
@article{SASI210,
			author = {Herman Katimin},
			title = {Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi},
			journal = {SASI},
			volume = {26},
			number = {1},
			year = {2020},
			keywords = {State Financial Losses and State Economy; Corruption; Death Penalty; Certain Circumstances},
			abstract = {The difficulty of capital punishment for perpetrators of corruption, although there are several examples of corruption cases that have fulfilled certain elements of the conditions as Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 20 of 2002 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. To discuss this problem, the research method used is juridical normative relating to certain elements of the state and the amount of state financial losses or the state's economy in determining the death penalty. The results of the discussion included not explaining the specific elements of certain circumstances as a burden for corruptors. In addition, the amount of state financial losses or the country's economy is very important in determining the death penalty is not formulated in certain circumstances. Therefore, it is recommended that specific formulations of certain elements and the amount of state financial losses or state economies that reach billions of up to triulian rupiah be subject to the death penalty.},
					issn = {2614-2961},			pages = {39--51}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210},
					url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/210}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 

Buku

[1] Ali, Mahrus. (2011). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

[2] Chaerudin, Syhaiful Ahmad Dinas dan Dafillah, Syarif. (2008). Strategi Pencegahan dan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

[3] Hadikusuma, H. (1995). Metode Pembuatan Kertas Kerja atau Skripsi Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

[4] Pascoe, Daniel dkk. (2016). Politik Hukuman Mati di Indonesia, Serpong: Marjin Kiri.

[5] Saleh, Roeslan. (1987). Sifat Melawan Hukum dari Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pidana¸ Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

[6] Sumaryanto, Djoko. (2019). Pengembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana dalam Rangka Pengembalian Kerugian Negara, Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

[7] Wiyono, R. (2009). Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Jurnal dan Lain-Lain

[8] Adji, Indriyanto Seno. (2001). Pidana mati Bagi Koruptor Sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi, Jurnal Keadilan.

[9] Hikmah dan Sopoyono, Eko. (2019). Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berbasis Nilai Keadilan, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Volume 1, Nomor 1.

[10] Muwahid. (2005). Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Progresif dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Uin Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Al-Quanun, Vol. 18 No. 2.

[11] Pribadi, Muhammaf Arif dkk. (2015). Eksistensi Pidana Mati Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Jurnal Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.

[12] Purba, Elizabeth. (2018). Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Berbagai Negara yang menerapkan hukuman mati (Indonesia, Cina dan Thailand), Jurnal Mahupiki, Vol 1, No 4.

[13] Sidauruk, Bornok Mariantha. (2011). Prospek Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia,Skripsi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang.

[14] Toule, Elsa R.M. (2013). Eksistensi Ancaman Pidana Mati dalam Undang-Undang TIndak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Prioris, Vol. 3 No. 3.

[15] Yanto, Oksidelfa. (2017). Penjatuhan pidana mati pelaku tindak pidana korupsi dalam keadaan tertentu (Death Penalty To Corruptors In a Certain Condition), Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Indonesia Journal of Legislation, Vol 14, No 1.

[16] Rofii, M. Sya’roni. Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor : Sebuah Diskursus Mendesak Di Masa Kritis. Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum, [S.L.], V. 12, N. 1, P. 53-65, May 2015. Issn 1829-8117. Available At: Http://E-Journal.Metrouniv.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Istinbath/Article/View/575.

[17] https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3987822/hakim-korupsi-e-ktp-rugikan-negara-rp-23-triliun.

[18] https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20191225121706-4-125555/kerugian-negara-rp-137-t-ini-respons-bos-ojk-soal-jiwasraya.

[19] https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/hukum-kriminal/08/02/2019/kasus-korupsi-sda-ini-sebabkan-kerugian-negara-hingga-triliunan-rupiah/.

[20] https:// www. kejaksaan.go.id/unit_ kejaksaan.php?idu =31&idsu=47&idke=0&hal=78&id =1893&bc=.

[21] https://www.tagar.id/kasus-korupsi-kementerian-agama-dana-haji-sampai-jual-beli-jabatan.

[22] https://republika.co.id/berita/kolom/fokus/plgszk318/korupsi-di-atas-penderitaan-korban-bencana-alam.

[23] https://metropekanbaru.com/icw-bupati-kudus-mengulang-korupsi-cabut-saja-hak-politik-koruptor/.

354 times.
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Views: 231 times.






Copyright (c) 2020 Herman Katimin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.