Kontroversi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Membatalkan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Melakukan Rekrutmen Terhadap Hakim
)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v26i2.252
Published
2020-06-04
How To Cite
@article{SASI252,
author = {Suparto Suparto},
title = {Kontroversi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Membatalkan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Melakukan Rekrutmen Terhadap Hakim},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {26},
number = {2},
year = {2020},
keywords = {Recruitment; Judge; Independency; Judicial Power},
abstract = {The Supreme Court conducted a selection of judges without the involvement of the Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee deemed the recruitment was violating the law since it was not involving them in the process. While the Supreme Court viewed that the implementation guidelines for the mutual regulation of the Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court was yet to be existed, while the need for fresh judges was deemed as urgent at that time. Based on that premise, the Supreme Court conducted the recruitment and appointment of judges, several supreme court judges and registrars were conducting a judicial review on the Law No. 49 of 2009, Law No. 50 of 2009, and Law No. 51 of 2009.The Constitutional Court granted their plea with Stipulation No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015.One of the points of considerations of the constitutional judges was the involvement of Judiciary Committee on the recruitment of judges was deemed to disrupt the independency of the Supreme Court. Actually, the involvement of the Judiciary Committee in the selection of judges will not intrude the independency of the judicial power or the judge itself. The independency of judges will be disrupted if the Judiciary Committee is intervening with the technical aspect of judicial power which includescross-examination, trial, and the verdict on a case.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {266--279} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i2.252},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/252}
}
Buku
[1] Suparto. (2017). Dinamika Hubungan Antara Mahkamah Agung Dengan Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Jakarta : Bina Karya.
[2] Syafrinaldi, ed. (2015). Hukum dan Teori Dalam Realita Masyarakat, Pekanbaru : UIR Press.
[3] Syafrinald,. ed. (2018). Problematika Hukum Indonesia Teori dan Praktek, Depok : Raja Grafindo Persada.
[4] Voermans, W. (2012). Komisi Yudisial Di Beberapa Negara Uni Eropa, Jakarta : LeIP.
Jurnal
[5] Faizal, A. (2016). "Politik Hukum Perlindungan Hakim", Jurnal Cita Hukum, 4 (1), 1-14 : 3 https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i1.2621
[6] Mukuan, C. (2016). "Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Perekrutan Hakim Menurut Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 2004 jo Undang-Undang No. 18 Tahun 2011 Tentang Komisi Yudisial", Jurnal Lex Administratum, IV (1), 5-12 : 5.
[7] Permana, T.C.I. (2014). "Eksistensi dan Peran Komisi Yudisial : Pengkajian Konteks Filosofi, Sejarah dan Tujuan Pembentukannya Dalam Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia", Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 3 (1), 85-100 : 96. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.3.1.2014.85-100
[8] Rahmatullah, I. dan Agusty, R.Z. (2016). "Memperkuat Hubungan Antar Lembaga Negara Dalam Bingkai Negara Hukum", Jurnal Salam, 3 (2), 231-244 : 241. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v3i2.7856
[9] Sihaloho, M. (2015). "Seleksi Pengangkatan Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia : Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor. 43/PUU-XII/2015", Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, 33 (2), 204-218 : 216-217. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v33i2.103
[10] Suanro. (2016). "Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Tafsir Mahkamah Konstitusi ; Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 43/PUU-XIII/2015", Jurnal Yudisial, 9 (2), 131-150 : 147
[11] Suparto. (2017). "Kedudukan dan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia dan Perbandingannya Dengan Komisi Yudisial Di Beberapa Negara Eropa", Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan,47 (4), 497-516 : 507. https://doi.org/10.21143/.vol47.no4.1585
[12] Ulya, Z. (2016). "Pembatalan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Rekruitmen Hakim Dikaitkan Dengan Konsep Independensi Hakim (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 43/PUU-XIII/2015", Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 28 (3), 482-496 : 493. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16686
[13] Wicaksono, E., et.al. (2016). "Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.43/PUU-XIII/2015 Tinjauan Tentang Inkonstitusionalitas Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Melakukan Rekruitmen Hakim Bersama Mahkamah Agung", Diponegoro Law Journal, 5 (4), 1-19 : 13,15.
: 6629 times
Download : 1091 times
Cited-By:
1. Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Mahkamah Agung ( Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 65 P/HUM/2018)
Suparto Suparto
SASI vol: 27 issue: 1 first page: 61 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Kewenangan Uji Material (Judicial Review) Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi
Lintang Galih Pratiwi
SASI vol: 26 issue: 4 first page: 514 year: 2020
Type: Journal [View Source]
Copyright (c) 2020 Suparto Suparto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Mahkamah Agung ( Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 65 P/HUM/2018)
Suparto Suparto
SASI vol: 27 issue: 1 first page: 61 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Kewenangan Uji Material (Judicial Review) Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi
Lintang Galih Pratiwi
SASI vol: 26 issue: 4 first page: 514 year: 2020
Type: Journal [View Source]
Email this article 
