Klaim Republik Rakyat China atas Zona Ekonomi Ekslusif Indonesia

Authors

  • Efie Baadilla Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.395

Keywords:

Claims, Zone Economic Exclusive, South China Sea

Abstract

The South China Sea is a strategic marine area and contains both living and non-living natural resources. The purpose of this paper is to analyze China's claim to Indonesia's ZEE in the South China Sea, which is known to Indonesia as the North Natuna Sea. China's claim to the Nine dash line in the South China Sea has had an impact on Indonesia and several countries. The research method uses normative research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of his study show that the recent conflict between Indonesia and China in the South China Sea has brought about a new conflict between the two countries even though Indonesia has so far not considered a problem. In fact, the application of the nine dash line as Traditional fishing grounds was not known in UNCLOS 1982, but the concept known was Traditional fishing rights. Indonesia has sovereignty and sovereign rights over North Natuna waters based on UNCLOS, for this reason, Indonesia needs to continue to carry out exploitation and exploration activities, supervision and legal action to guarantee the sovereign rights of the State.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

[1] Gumilang, E; Utomo, H; Buntoro, K. (2018). "Dampak Aktivitas Militer Asing Di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Terhadap Keamanan Maritim Indonesia", Jurnal Keamanan Maritim, 4(3): 21-42.

[2] Haiton, B. (2009), "The Modern Origins of Chinas South China Sea Claims: Maps, Misunderstandings, and the Maritime Goebody", Sage Journals.

[3] Monteiro, S. (2020), "Yurisdiksi Negara Pantai di Wilayah Delimitasi Maritim Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif yang Belum Ditetapkan Berdasarkan Ketentuan Hukum Laut Internasional (Study Di Timor Leste-Indonesia)", Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 6 (1): 303-334.
https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23770

[4] Prakasa, S. U. W; Purwo, Al. (2019), "Analisis Historical Traditional Fishing Right Pada Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia", Legality, 27 (1): 83-97.
https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i1.8960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i1.8960

[5] Rehatta, V. J. B. (2014), "Penyelesaian Sengketa Perikanan di Laut Lepas Menurut Hukum Internasional", SASI, 20 (1): 62-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v20i1.346

[6] Santoso, T. I., (2020), "Aksi Agresivitas Cina Pada Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Laut Natuna Utara: Perspektif Tugas Pokok TNI". Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, Edisi 41 (Maret): 35-46.

[7] Tampi, B. (2017), "Konflik Kepulauan Natuna Antara Indonesia dengan China (Suatu Kajian Yuridis)", Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 23 (10): 1-16.

[8] Adololf, H. (1991). Aspek-Aspek Negara dalam Hukum Internasional, Jakarta: Rajawali.

[9] Koers, A. W, (1994). Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsas-Bangsa tentang Hukum Laut, Yokyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

[10] Kusumaatmaja, M. (2003), Hukum Laut Internasional, Bandung: Alumni.

[11] Mauna, B. (2000), Hukum Internasional: Pengertian, Peranan dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global, Bandung: Alumni.

[12] Subagyo, P. J. (2005). Hukum Laut Indonesia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

[13] Sefriani, (2017). Hukum Internasional: Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

[14] https//news.detik.com/berita/d4859575. Diakses 15 Januari 2020.

[15] https;www.medcom.id/ nota protes RI 7 Januari 2020.

[16] Juana, Hikmahanto, Ceramah pada Seminar Indonesian Society of International Law Lecturers, Samarinda Tanggal 3 Agustus 2019

[17] Juwana, H. "Dialog tvOne: Kapal Cina Masuk Laut Natuna", Tanggal 5 Januari 2020

[18] Juwana, H, "Press Release", 28 Januari 2020

[19] Juana, H, "Press Release", 30 Januari 2020

[20] Pernyataan pers Menteri Luar Negeri Indonesia, tvOne,26 Januari 2020.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-21

How to Cite

Klaim Republik Rakyat China atas Zona Ekonomi Ekslusif Indonesia. (2020). SASI, 26(3), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.395

Most read articles by the same author(s)