Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional

Rendyano Rizalno Hiariej; Arman Anwar; Welly Angela Riry

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1109

Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional

Rendyano Rizalno Hiariej⁽¹⁾, Arman Anwar⁽²⁾, Welly Angela Riry⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Indonesia from time immemorial until after independence faced various kinds of problems, both international and non-international. Although this problem can be solved in different ways, there are also parties who can solve it in an unsympathetic way. This can encourage the emergence of conflicts arising from the current struggle, in particular armed conflicts.

Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to examine and discuss how the regulation of rebel organizations as a legal subject is reviewed from international law.

Methods of the Research: The method used is a normative juridical research method using a case approach, a statutory approach and a conceptual approach.

Results of the Research: The results obtained from the study show that the instruments of international law governing rebels as subjects of international law are the Hague Convention IV of 1907, as well as The Supplementary Protocol II of the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The Rebels, Insurgents and Belligerents remain obliged to comply with the provisions of international law. The Free Papua Organization (OPM) does not yet have a juridical personality as a subject of international law because it does not meet the criteria for rebels as stipulated in the 1907 Hague Convention IV and the Geneva Conventions. 1949. While the status of the opening of the OPM Representative Office in the United Kingdom does not affect the British attitude in respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Indonesia including the recognition of Papua as part of the Republic of Indonesia. The resolution of the Papuan conflict should take a way of peaceful and integrated negotiations with the interests of the welfare of the people in Papua as a whole.

Keywords

OPM; International Law; Regulation.

How To Cite

APA: Hiariej, R.R., Anwar, A., & Riry, W.A. (2022). Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(5), 456 – 466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1109.

IEEE: R.R. Hiariej, A. Anwar, and W.A. Riry, "Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 456 – 466, Jul. 2022. Accessed on: Apr. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1109

Harvard: Hiariej, R.R., Anwar, A., and Riry, W.A., (2022). "Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(5), pp. 456 – 466. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1109 (Accessed on: 20 April 2024)

Chicago: Hiariej, Rendyano Rizalno, Arman Anwar, and Welly Angela Riry. "Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 5 (July 31, 2022): 456 – 466. Accessed April 20, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1109

Vancouver: Hiariej RR, Anwar A, Riry WA. Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Jul 31 [cited 2024 Apr 20];2(5):456 – 466. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1109

MLA 8th: Hiariej, Rendyano Rizalno, Arman Anwar, and Welly Angela Riry. "Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 5, 31 Jul. 2022, pp. 456 – 466, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1109. Accessed 20 Apr. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1109,
		author = {Rendyano Hiariej and Arman Anwar and Welly Riry},
		title = {Pengaturan Mengenai Pengakuan Terhadap Organisasi Pemberontak Sebagai Subjek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {5},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {OPM; International Law; Regulation.},
		abstract = {Introduction: Indonesia from time immemorial until after independence faced various kinds of problems, both international and non-international. Although this problem can be solved in different ways, there are also parties who can solve it in an unsympathetic way. This can encourage the emergence of conflicts arising from the current struggle, in particular armed conflicts.Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to examine and discuss how the regulation of rebel organizations as a legal subject is reviewed from international law.Methods of the Research: The method used is a normative juridical research method using a case approach, a statutory approach and a conceptual approach.Results of the Research: The results obtained from the study show that the instruments of international law governing rebels as subjects of international law are the Hague Convention IV of 1907, as well as The Supplementary Protocol II of the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The Rebels, Insurgents and Belligerents remain obliged to comply with the provisions of international law. The Free Papua Organization (OPM) does not yet have a juridical personality as a subject of international law because it does not meet the criteria for rebels as stipulated in the 1907 Hague Convention IV and the Geneva Conventions. 1949. While the status of the opening of the OPM Representative Office in the United Kingdom does not affect the British attitude in respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Indonesia including the recognition of Papua as part of the Republic of Indonesia.  The resolution of the Papuan conflict should take a way of peaceful and integrated negotiations with the interests of the welfare of the people in Papua as a whole.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {456--466}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1109},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1109}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Ahmad Syafi’I Mufid, Peta Gerakan Radikal di Indonesia, Puslitbang Kehidupan, 2013.

Aiin Adwiyah, Arman Anwar, and Josina Wattimena. 2022. “Self Defense Yang Dilakukan Oleh Amerika Serikat Terhadap Jenderal Soleimani Dalam Prespektif Hukum Internasional”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 (1), 66-73

Bima Ari Putri Wijata, Insurgency and Belligerency, Semarang, 2013.

Boer Mauna, Hukum Internasional: Pengertian, Peranan dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global, Keagamaan Balitbanag dan Diklat Kemena, 2015.

Erlina Permanasari, Pengantar Hukum Humaniter, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1999.

Haryomataram, Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

Haryomataram, Pengantar Hukum Humaniter, Jakarta: Rajawali, 1984.

Huala Adolf, Aspek-Aspek Negara dalam Hukum Internasional, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 1991.

I Wayan Parthiana, Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1990.

Levee en Masse oleh International Committee of the Red Cross dalam

websitenya,http://www.icrc.org/customaryihl/eng/print/v1_cha_chapter1_rule5

M. Fathoni Hakim, “Pemberontakan Organisasi Papua Merdeka; Suatu Studi Kasus Tentang Integrasi Politik di Irian Jaya dari tahun 1964-1984”, Tesis, Pascasarjana Ilmu Politik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial & Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2010.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja & Etty R. Agoes, Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Bandung: Bina Cipta, 2003.

Riyanto, Sigit. 2012 “Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional Kontemporer”, Jurnal Yustisia,Vol 3 No. 9.

Samekto, Kasus Aceh Indonesia Tak Dapat Dituntut”, Suara Merdeka, 2003.

Sudarsono, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2007.

Sugono, Dendy ed. Et.all, , Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Kamus Pusat, 2008.

Welly Angela Riry, 2021, Ratifikasi Perjanjian Internasional Sebagai Salah Satu Bentuk Politik Hukum Nasional, Jurnal Syantax Transformation Vol. 2 No 2, 2021.

Welly Angela Riry, dkk, Perjanjian Kerjasama Internasional Dalam Konstruksi Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia, Balobe Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 1, 2021.

Full Text: PDF