Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata

Jihan Rizki Putri Permono; Merry Tjoanda; Pieter Radjawane

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110

Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata

Jihan Rizki Putri Permono⁽¹⁾, Merry Tjoanda⁽²⁾, Pieter Radjawane⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The development of information technology right now introduced to the public by the existence of electronic evidence.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to discuss the strength of e-mail evidence in civil case trials in strengthening an argument in court

Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research. This type of research is descriptive analysis. Focusing on an inventory of positive law, legal principles and doctrines, legal findings in cases in concreto, legal systematics, legal synchronization levels, legal comparisons and legal history.

Results of the Research: Electronic evidence can have legal force if the information obtained guarantees its integrity, can be accounted for, and can be displayed so as to explain a situation. The regulation of electronic information and electronic documents is contained in Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) where this law is expressly declared valid as evidence in court, especially in civil courts and regulation no. 82 of 2012 concerning the implementation of electronic systems and transactions and reinforced by Article 5 paragraph 1 of the Electronic Information and Technology Law (UU ITE) that electronic information and/or electronic documents and/or their printed results are legal evidence.

Keywords

Strength; E-mail; Evidence

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110

Published

2022-07-31

How To Cite

APA: Permono, J.R., Tjoanda, M., & Radjawane, P. (2022). Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(5), 467 – 479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110.

IEEE: J.R. Permono, M. Tjoanda, and P. Radjawane, "Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 467 – 479, Jul. 2022. Accessed on: Nov. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110

Harvard: Permono, J.R., Tjoanda, M., and Radjawane, P., (2022). "Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(5), pp. 467 – 479. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110 (Accessed on: 21 November 2024)

Chicago: Permono, Jihan Rizki Putri, Merry Tjoanda, and Pieter Radjawane. "Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 5 (July 31, 2022): 467 – 479. Accessed November 21, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110

Vancouver: Permono JR, Tjoanda M, Radjawane P. Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Jul 31 [cited 2024 Nov 21];2(5):467 – 479. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110

MLA 8th: Permono, Jihan Rizki Putri, Merry Tjoanda, and Pieter Radjawane. "Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 5, 31 Jul. 2022, pp. 467 – 479, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1110,
		author = {Jihan Permono and Merry Tjoanda and Pieter Radjawane},
		title = {Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-mail Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {5},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Strength; E-mail; Evidence},
		abstract = {Introduction: The development of information technology right now introduced to the public by the existence of electronic evidence.Purposes of the Research:  The purpose of this study is to discuss the strength of e-mail evidence in civil case trials in strengthening an argument in courtMethods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research. This type of research is descriptive analysis. Focusing on an inventory of positive law, legal principles and doctrines, legal findings in cases in concreto, legal systematics, legal synchronization levels, legal comparisons and legal history.Results of the Research: Electronic evidence can have legal force if the information obtained guarantees its integrity, can be accounted for, and can be displayed so as to explain a situation. The regulation of electronic information and electronic documents is contained in Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) where this law is expressly declared valid as evidence in court, especially in civil courts and regulation no. 82 of 2012 concerning the implementation of electronic systems and transactions and reinforced by Article 5 paragraph 1 of the Electronic Information and Technology Law (UU ITE) that electronic information and/or electronic documents and/or their printed results are legal evidence.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {467--479}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1110},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1110}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Bambang Sugeng A.S. dan Sujayadi, Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata dan contoh dokumen litigasi, Jakarta: Kencana Prenamedia Group, 2012.

Djanggih, H., & Hipan, N. Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial (Kajian Putusan Nomor: 324/Pid./2014/PN.SGM). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 1 (2018): 93-102.

Fransiscus Xaverius Vincent Roger Letsoin. "Pengakuan Tandatangan Pada Dokumen Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia." SASI 16, no. 3 (2010): 52-60.

Gunawan Tamher, Ronald Saija, and Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun. "Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 11 (2022): 1103–1119.

Hazar Kusmayanti, Yola Maulin, Eidy Sandra, “Breach of Notarial Deed for Peace under Indonesian Civil Law Perspective”, Media Hukum 26, no. 1 (2019).

Hwian Christianto, Alat Bukti Dokumen Elektronik Dalam Perkara Perdata https://gagasanhukum.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/alat-bukti-dokumen-elektronik-dalam-perkaraperdata.

Iman Sjahputra. Problematika Hukum Internet Indonesia. Jakarta: 2002.

Johan Wahyudi, Dokumen Elektronik sebagai Alat Bukti pada Pembuktian diPengadilan, Vol. XVII No.2 Mei 2012, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.

Koesparmono Irsan, Pengkajian Hukum tentang masalah kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti Elektronik, Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1996.

M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.

M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.

Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Peradilan Agama, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1998.

M. Yahya Harahap Pembahasan Permasalahan Penerapan KUHAP, Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini, 1985.

Mertokusumo Sudikno , Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2010.

Muchtar A H Labetubun, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Logo (Suatu Kajian Overlapping Hak Cipta Dan Merek),” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 5, no. 1 (2019): 151–66, https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v5i1.93.

Moh. Nafri,“Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia” Maleo Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2019).

Wahyudi, J. Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Pembuktian di Pengadilan. Perspektif, 2012.

Full Text: PDF