Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan

Cantika W Muhrim; Sherly Adam; Elias Zadrach Leasa

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442

Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan

Cantika W Muhrim⁽¹⁾, Sherly Adam⁽²⁾, Elias Zadrach Leasa⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are one aspect of realizing the value of a judge's decision that contains justice and contains legal certainty. In deciding a case the judge must consider the juridical, sociological and philosophical truths.

Purposes of the Research: Analyze and discuss the judges legal considerations against the mitigating testimony based on the decision of the district cour No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. analyze and discuss the imposition of sanctions against the crime of rapoe based on decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”.

Methods of the Research: This research uses the juridical normative method by using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.

Results of the Research: The results showed that the judge’s leal considerations in the decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb resulted in the defendant bein acquitted because of the weak evidence presented by the public prosecutor, namely there were no eye witnesses, expert witnesses and also Visum et Repertum which were not used as evidence. On the other hand, the defendant has a mitigating witness, where mitigating facts greatly influence the judgge in imposing sancsions. Based on this decision the judge that the intercourse was consesual, so the judge handed down an acquittal against the defendant.

Keywords

Optimization of Hadling; The Criminal act Fisheries; Legal Certainty

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442

Published

2022-12-20

How To Cite

APA: Muhrim, C.W., Adam, S., & Leasa, E.Z. (2022). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(10), 1033 – 1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442.

IEEE: C.W. Muhrim, S. Adam, and E.Z. Leasa, "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1033 – 1043, Dec. 2022. Accessed on: May. 2, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442

Harvard: Muhrim, C.W., Adam, S., and Leasa, E.Z., (2022). "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(10), pp. 1033 – 1043. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442 (Accessed on: 2 May 2024)

Chicago: Muhrim, Cantika W, Sherly Adam, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 10 (December 20, 2022): 1033 – 1043. Accessed May 2, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442

Vancouver: Muhrim CW, Adam S, Leasa EZ. Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Dec 20 [cited 2024 May 2];2(10):1033 – 1043. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442

MLA 8th: Muhrim, Cantika W, Sherly Adam, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 10, 20 Dec. 2022, pp. 1033 – 1043, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442. Accessed 2 May. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1442,
		author = {Cantika Muhrim and Sherly Adam and Elias Leasa},
		title = {Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {10},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Optimization of Hadling; The Criminal act Fisheries; Legal Certainty},
		abstract = {Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are one aspect of realizing the value of a judge's decision that contains justice and contains legal certainty. In deciding a case the judge must consider the juridical, sociological and philosophical truths.Purposes of the Research: Analyze and discuss the judges legal considerations against the mitigating testimony based on the decision of the district cour No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. analyze and discuss the imposition of sanctions against the crime of rapoe based on decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. Methods of the Research: This research uses the juridical normative method by using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.Results of the Research: The results showed that the judge’s leal considerations in the decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb resulted in the defendant bein acquitted because of the weak evidence presented by the public prosecutor, namely there were no eye witnesses, expert witnesses and also Visum et Repertum which were not used as evidence. On the other hand, the defendant has a mitigating witness, where mitigating facts greatly influence the judgge in imposing sancsions. Based on this decision the judge that the intercourse was consesual, so the judge handed down an acquittal against the defendant.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1033--1043}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1442}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001 E. Utrecht, Hukum Pidana I, Universitas Jakarta, Jakarta, 1958, hal. 157. Ivan Setiawan, Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum, Volume 6 No.2, September 2016 J. E. Sahetappy, Ancaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana, Almuni Bandung, 1979 Karjadi R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Politea, Bogor, 1997 Koeswadji, Perkembangan Macam-Macam Pidana Dalam Rangka Pembangunan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung, 1995 Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1984 S. M. Amin, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Negeri, Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 2009. Satochid Kartanegara, Hukum Pidana Bagian Satu, Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, Jakarta, 1998. SR. Sianturi, Tindak Pidana Di KUHP Berikut Uraiannya, Alumni Petehaem, Cetakan ke-2, Jakarta, 1989 Syarifah Dewi Indawati, Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Menjatuhkan Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Terdakwa Dalam Perkara Penipuan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Denpasar Nomor: 24/PID/2015/PT.DPS), Jurnal Verstek Volume 5 Nomor 2.

Full Text: PDF