Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan

Cantika W Muhrim(1email), Sherly Adam(2), Elias Zadrach Leasa(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are one aspect of realizing the value of a judge's decision that contains justice and contains legal certainty. In deciding a case the judge must consider the juridical, sociological and philosophical truths.

Purposes of the Research: Analyze and discuss the judges legal considerations against the mitigating testimony based on the decision of the district cour No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. analyze and discuss the imposition of sanctions against the crime of rapoe based on decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”.

 

Methods of the Research: This research uses the juridical normative method by using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.

Results of the Research: The results showed that the judge’s leal considerations in the decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb resulted in the defendant bein acquitted because of the weak evidence presented by the public prosecutor, namely there were no eye witnesses, expert witnesses and also Visum et Repertum which were not used as evidence. On the other hand, the defendant has a mitigating witness, where mitigating facts greatly influence the judgge in imposing sancsions. Based on this decision the judge that the intercourse was consesual, so the judge handed down an acquittal against the defendant.

Keywords


Optimization of Hadling; The Criminal act Fisheries; Legal Certainty


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442

Published


2022-12-20

How To Cite


APA: Muhrim, C.W., Adam, S., & Leasa, E.Z. (2022). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(10), 1033 – 1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442.
IEEE: C.W. Muhrim, S. Adam, and E.Z. Leasa, "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1033 – 1043, Dec. 2022. Accessed on: Jun. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442
Harvard: Muhrim, C.W., Adam, S., and Leasa, E.Z., (2022). "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(10), pp. 1033 – 1043. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442 (Accessed on: 15 June 2024)
Chicago: Muhrim, Cantika W, Sherly Adam, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 10 (December 20, 2022): 1033 – 1043. Accessed June 15, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442
Vancouver: Muhrim CW, Adam S, Leasa EZ. Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Dec 20 [cited 2024 Jun 15];2(10):1033 – 1043. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442
MLA 8th: Muhrim, Cantika W, Sherly Adam, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 10, 20 Dec. 2022, pp. 1033 – 1043, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442. Accessed 15 Jun. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI1442,
		author = {Cantika Muhrim and Sherly Adam and Elias Leasa},
		title = {Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {10},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Optimization of Hadling; The Criminal act Fisheries; Legal Certainty},
		abstract = {Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are one aspect of realizing the value of a judge's decision that contains justice and contains legal certainty. In deciding a case the judge must consider the juridical, sociological and philosophical truths.Purposes of the Research: Analyze and discuss the judges legal considerations against the mitigating testimony based on the decision of the district cour No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. analyze and discuss the imposition of sanctions against the crime of rapoe based on decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. Methods of the Research: This research uses the juridical normative method by using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.Results of the Research: The results showed that the judge’s leal considerations in the decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb resulted in the defendant bein acquitted because of the weak evidence presented by the public prosecutor, namely there were no eye witnesses, expert witnesses and also Visum et Repertum which were not used as evidence. On the other hand, the defendant has a mitigating witness, where mitigating facts greatly influence the judgge in imposing sancsions. Based on this decision the judge that the intercourse was consesual, so the judge handed down an acquittal against the defendant.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1033--1043}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1442}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001 E. Utrecht, Hukum Pidana I, Universitas Jakarta, Jakarta, 1958, hal. 157. Ivan Setiawan, Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum, Volume 6 No.2, September 2016 J. E. Sahetappy, Ancaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana, Almuni Bandung, 1979 Karjadi R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Politea, Bogor, 1997 Koeswadji, Perkembangan Macam-Macam Pidana Dalam Rangka Pembangunan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung, 1995 Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1984 S. M. Amin, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Negeri, Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 2009. Satochid Kartanegara, Hukum Pidana Bagian Satu, Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, Jakarta, 1998. SR. Sianturi, Tindak Pidana Di KUHP Berikut Uraiannya, Alumni Petehaem, Cetakan ke-2, Jakarta, 1989 Syarifah Dewi Indawati, Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Menjatuhkan Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Terdakwa Dalam Perkara Penipuan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Denpasar Nomor: 24/PID/2015/PT.DPS), Jurnal Verstek Volume 5 Nomor 2.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 207 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 198 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Cantika W Muhrim, Sherly Adam, Elias Zadrach Leasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.