Pengaturan Perjanjian Internasional Dan Relevansinya Dengan Klaim Pulau Dokdo Berdasarkan Perjanjian San Fransisco 1951
), Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw(2), Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The Dokdo Island dispute is one of the disputes involving Japan and South Korea. Both Japan and South Korea still hold fast that Dokdo Island is part of their country's sovereignty.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to find out and examine the arrangement of international agreements in claiming an area as well as to find out and examine the settlement of claims made by Japan against Dokdo Island based on the 1951 San Francisco Agreement.
Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this research is normative juridical (normative legal research type), which is an approach that is carried out by researching or studying well library materials or literature studies. Especially to examine the provisions of positive law, legal principles, legal principles, and international law doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced.
Results of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the emphasizes that an international treaty dispute must be resolved by peaceful means in accordance with the principles of justice and international law. The 1951 San Francisco agreement itself does not explain the arrangement of international agreements in claiming an area, either directly or indirectly bordering areas. Because the San Francisco agreement itself was a peace treaty between Japan and the Allies to end World War II. Various dispute resolution efforts have been carried out such as diplomatic and judicial settlements, but until now the right way to resolve the Dokdo Island dispute has not been found. Based on the contents of the 1951 San Francisco Agreement, there was no discussion related to the settlement of the Dokdo island dispute between Japan and South Korea or other international disputes because the agreement was only a peace agreement between Japan and its allies in ending World War II. However, there are several ways of resolving disputes that can be taken by both parties, both through non-litigation and litigation channels, such as through mediation, negotiation to settlement through the International Court of Justice.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v2i11.1448
Published
2023-01-31
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI1448,
author = {Cliff Latumeten and Johanis Peilouw and Lucia Tahamata},
title = {Pengaturan Perjanjian Internasional Dan Relevansinya Dengan Klaim Pulau Dokdo Berdasarkan Perjanjian San Fransisco 1951},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {2},
number = {11},
year = {2023},
keywords = {1951 San Francisco Treaty; Dokdo Island; Territory; Japan and South Korea.},
abstract = {Introduction: The Dokdo Island dispute is one of the disputes involving Japan and South Korea. Both Japan and South Korea still hold fast that Dokdo Island is part of their country's sovereignty.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to find out and examine the arrangement of international agreements in claiming an area as well as to find out and examine the settlement of claims made by Japan against Dokdo Island based on the 1951 San Francisco Agreement. Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this research is normative juridical (normative legal research type), which is an approach that is carried out by researching or studying well library materials or literature studies. Especially to examine the provisions of positive law, legal principles, legal principles, and international law doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced.Results of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the emphasizes that an international treaty dispute must be resolved by peaceful means in accordance with the principles of justice and international law. The 1951 San Francisco agreement itself does not explain the arrangement of international agreements in claiming an area, either directly or indirectly bordering areas. Because the San Francisco agreement itself was a peace treaty between Japan and the Allies to end World War II. Various dispute resolution efforts have been carried out such as diplomatic and judicial settlements, but until now the right way to resolve the Dokdo Island dispute has not been found. Based on the contents of the 1951 San Francisco Agreement, there was no discussion related to the settlement of the Dokdo island dispute between Japan and South Korea or other international disputes because the agreement was only a peace agreement between Japan and its allies in ending World War II. However, there are several ways of resolving disputes that can be taken by both parties, both through non-litigation and litigation channels, such as through mediation, negotiation to settlement through the International Court of Justice.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {1099--1111} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i11.1448},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1448}
}
Brian Taylor Sumner, Territorial Disputes At The International Court of Justice, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 53, No. 1779, 2004.
Colonizer-Colony Pair: The Case of the Dokdo/Takeshima Dispute between Korea and Japan. Korea Observer.
Dokdo takeshima, “ Shimane Declares Takeshima Day as February 22 – Japan Adds insult Injury “ Dokdo Takeshima Island Liancourt Rocks Facts of the Dokdo Island Dispute (dokdo-takeshima.com).
Eddy Pratomo, Hukum Perjanjian Internasional (Pengertian, Status Hukum, dan Ratifikasi), Alumni, Bandung 2011.
I. H. Hanafi, Penemuan Hukum dalam Mahkamah Internasional (kasus Corfu Channel), https://fh.unpatti.ac.id/penemuan-hukum-dalam-mahkamah-internasional-kasus-corfu-channel/.
Jepang Geram Pejabat Korea Selatan mengunjungi pulau sengketa https://news.okezone.com/read/2017/01/25/18/1600831/jepang-geram-pejabat-korea-selatan-kunjungi-pulau-sengketa.
Kim, H.M, & Cho, J. A New Approach to a Territorial Dispute Involving a Former Colonizer-Colony Pair: The Case of the Dokdo/Takeshima Dispute between Korea and Japan. Korea Observer, 2011.
Lawrence Olson, Japan in Postwar Asia, Praeger Publishers, New York – Washington – London, 1970.
L.F.L. Oppenheim, International Law, Vol. 1, Ninth Edition 1992.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Prenada Media Grup. Jakarta, 2005.
R. Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarata, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, 2004.
Schwartz, T., & Yoo, J. Asian Territorial Disputes and the 1951 San Fransisco Peace, 2019.
Seokwoo Lee, Boundary & Territory Briefing, The Resolution of the Territorial Dispute between Korea and Japan over the Liancourt Rocks, Volume 3 number 8, 2002.
Treaty: The Case of Dokdo. Chinese Journal of International Law, 18(3), 503-550. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmz017.
Yavier Pattiasina, Josina Agusthina Yvonne Wattimena, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw. (2022). Putusan Permanen Court Of Arbitration Dalam Sengketa Antara Philipina-China Dan Implikasinya Bagi Stabilitas Keamanan Di Laut China Selatan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 13-24.
: 560 times
Download : 469 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Pengaturan Perjanjian Internasional Dan Relevansinya Dengan Klaim Pulau Dokdo Berdasarkan Perjanjian San Fransisco 1951 |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Cliff Markus Latumeten; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | 1951 San Francisco Treaty; Dokdo Island; Territory; Japan and South Korea. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The Dokdo Island dispute is one of the disputes involving Japan and South Korea. Both Japan and South Korea still hold fast that Dokdo Island is part of their country's sovereignty.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to find out and examine the arrangement of international agreements in claiming an area as well as to find out and examine the settlement of claims made by Japan against Dokdo Island based on the 1951 San Francisco Agreement. Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this research is normative juridical (normative legal research type), which is an approach that is carried out by researching or studying well library materials or literature studies. Especially to examine the provisions of positive law, legal principles, legal principles, and international law doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced.Results of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the emphasizes that an international treaty dispute must be resolved by peaceful means in accordance with the principles of justice and international law. The 1951 San Francisco agreement itself does not explain the arrangement of international agreements in claiming an area, either directly or indirectly bordering areas. Because the San Francisco agreement itself was a peace treaty between Japan and the Allies to end World War II. Various dispute resolution efforts have been carried out such as diplomatic and judicial settlements, but until now the right way to resolve the Dokdo Island dispute has not been found. Based on the contents of the 1951 San Francisco Agreement, there was no discussion related to the settlement of the Dokdo island dispute between Japan and South Korea or other international disputes because the agreement was only a peace agreement between Japan and its allies in ending World War II. However, there are several ways of resolving disputes that can be taken by both parties, both through non-litigation and litigation channels, such as through mediation, negotiation to settlement through the International Court of Justice. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2023-01-31 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1448 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v2i11.1448 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 2, No 11 (2023): Volume 2 Nomor 11, Januari 2023 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Cliff Markus Latumeten, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw, Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
