Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Yang Dirugikan Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama Pembiayaan Biji Nikel

Hamada Reinaldy Mantulameten; Merry Tjoanda; Novyta Uktolseja

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i12.1457

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Yang Dirugikan Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama Pembiayaan Biji Nikel

Hamada Reinaldy Mantulameten⁽¹⁾, Merry Tjoanda⁽²⁾, Novyta Uktolseja⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: This article analyzes the business cooperation agreement which in practice, the principle of balance is often ignored, so that when a default occurs, the creditor consortium cannot force the debtor to carry out its achievements through the execution of the debtor's assets as collateral, due to the lack of collateral provided by the debtor.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to find out the implementation of the financing cooperation agreement between PT Kingstone Anugerah Perkasa and PT Bumi Putera Abadi and PT Mineral Trobos, and to find out about legal protection for the aggrieved party in the financing cooperation agreement between PT Kingstone Anugerah Perkasa and PT Bumi Putera Abadi with PT Trobos Minerals.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach conseptual approach and case approach, and uses secondary data and is analyzed qualitatively.

Results of the Research: The financing cooperation agreement between PT Kingstone Anugrah Perkasa and PT Bumi Putera Abadi and PT Mineral Trobos did not go well. This is because in the post-contract/implementation phase of the agreed contents of the agreement, PT Mineral Trobos defaulted by not carrying out its obligation to complete the permit no later than 60 days from the signing of the financing cooperation agreement, so that PT Kingstone Anugrah Perkasa and PT Bumi Putera Abadi have the right to filed a lawsuit for default of PT Mineral Trobos to the Kendari District Court.

Keywords

Cooperation Agreement; Default; Legal Protection

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v2i12.1457

Published

2023-02-28

How To Cite

APA: Mantulameten, H.R., Tjoanda, M., & Uktolseja, N. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Yang Dirugikan Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama Pembiayaan Biji Nikel. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(12), 1185 – 1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i12.1457.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1457,
		author = {Hamada Mantulameten and Merry Tjoanda and Novyta Uktolseja},
		title = {Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Yang Dirugikan Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama Pembiayaan Biji Nikel},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {12},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Cooperation Agreement; Default; Legal Protection},
		abstract = {Introduction: This article analyzes the business cooperation agreement which in practice, the principle of balance is often ignored, so that when a default occurs, the creditor consortium cannot force the debtor to carry out its achievements through the execution of the debtor's assets as collateral, due to the lack of collateral provided by the debtor.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to find out the implementation of the financing cooperation agreement between PT Kingstone Anugerah Perkasa and PT Bumi Putera Abadi and PT Mineral Trobos, and to find out about legal protection for the aggrieved party in the financing cooperation agreement between PT Kingstone Anugerah Perkasa and PT Bumi Putera Abadi with PT Trobos Minerals. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach conseptual approach and case approach, and uses secondary data and is analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research: The financing cooperation agreement between PT Kingstone Anugrah Perkasa and PT Bumi Putera Abadi and PT Mineral Trobos did not go well. This is because in the post-contract/implementation phase of the agreed contents of the agreement, PT Mineral Trobos defaulted by not carrying out its obligation to complete the permit no later than 60 days from the signing of the financing cooperation agreement, so that PT Kingstone Anugrah Perkasa and PT Bumi Putera Abadi have the right to filed a lawsuit for default of PT Mineral Trobos to the Kendari District Court.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1185--1192}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i12.1457},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1457}
		}

Citation format: Download Citation:

Anggraeni, Shirley Zerlinda. Perbedaan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Waarmerking, Legalisasi, dan Akta Notariil. E Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Semaya. Vol. 05, No. 02, 2017.

Ariyani, Evi, Hukum Perjanjian. Yogyakarta: Ombak, 2013.

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus, Hukum Perikatan dalam KUH Perdata Buku Ketiga. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Pradana Media Group, 2011.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Nurainy Usman, Merry Tjoanda, Saartje Sarah Alfons, “Akibat Hukum Dari Pemutusan Kontrak Secara Sepihak”, Batulis Civil Law Rev, Volume 2 Nomor 1, Mei 2021.

Full Text: PDF