Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Penerbitan Surat Perintah Penyidikan Ganda

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

Abstract
Introduction: An Investigative Order or Sprindik is one of the legal processes related to administration in giving authority to investigators to be able to carry out investigations.
Purposes of the Research: To analyze and discuss whether it is justified in terms of criminal procedural law procedures, issuance of investigative orders (sprindiks) on the same legal subject with different objects and to explain what legal consequences occur when two sprindiks are issued from the same subject, in the case of BNI Ambon branch main office in 2019.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research. In this study, three approaches to the problem are used, namely the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses the literature study method. All data in this study were analyzed qualitatively.
Results of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the rules regarding the issuance of the Sprindik are in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure law but there are no rules that specifically regulate the number of times the Sprindik is issued by investigators. In a criminal case, the issuance of the double Sprindik resulted in the abuse of power (abuse of power), conflict of interest among investigators, and the cancellation of the Sprindik through the pretrial process and the existence of the Double Sprindik resulted in the absence of legal certainty regarding which Sprindik was used. This is because there are no regulations that explicitly regulate the number of times the Sprindik is issued.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v3i1.1555
Published
2023-03-31
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI1555, author = {Vivi Ririhena and John Pasalbessy and Jacob Hattu}, title = {Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Penerbitan Surat Perintah Penyidikan Ganda}, journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum}, volume = {3}, number = {1}, year = {2023}, keywords = {Double Sprindik; Investigator; Investigation; Criminal Case}, abstract = {Introduction: An Investigative Order or Sprindik is one of the legal processes related to administration in giving authority to investigators to be able to carry out investigations.Purposes of the Research: To analyze and discuss whether it is justified in terms of criminal procedural law procedures, issuance of investigative orders (sprindiks) on the same legal subject with different objects and to explain what legal consequences occur when two sprindiks are issued from the same subject, in the case of BNI Ambon branch main office in 2019. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research. In this study, three approaches to the problem are used, namely the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses the literature study method. All data in this study were analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the rules regarding the issuance of the Sprindik are in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure law but there are no rules that specifically regulate the number of times the Sprindik is issued by investigators. In a criminal case, the issuance of the double Sprindik resulted in the abuse of power (abuse of power), conflict of interest among investigators, and the cancellation of the Sprindik through the pretrial process and the existence of the Double Sprindik resulted in the absence of legal certainty regarding which Sprindik was used. This is because there are no regulations that explicitly regulate the number of times the Sprindik is issued.}, issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {100--111} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i1.1555}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1555} }
Afandi Maruli Silalahi dan Ijul Tajudin, “Profesionalisme Penegak Hukum Terhadap Penetapan Tersangka Setelah Putusan Praperadilan Yang Menyatakan Tidak Sahnya Penetapan Tersangka”. Jurnal Bina Mulia, Vol. 2, 2018.
Albert Aries, (2015), Fungsi Surat Perintah Penyidikan (Sprindik), https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt55c1a0bd9b5e8/fungsi-surat-perintah-penyidikan-sprindik.
Andi Sofyan dan Abd. Asis (2nd ed), Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar.
Bagir Manan, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2001.
Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Hukum Acara Pidana, Cetakan II, Universitas Terbuka, Tanggerang Selatan, 2017.
Hattu, T. Y., Toule, E. R. M., & Wadjo, H. Z. Penyidikan Terhadap Pelaku Pencurian Benda Sitaan Pada Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 1. No. 10, Desember 2021.
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, (2nd ed), Cet. 18, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2017.
Ramadhan Kasim dan Apriyanto Nusa, Hukum Acara Pidana, Teori, Asas Dan Perkembangannya Pasca Putusan Kosntitusi, Setara Press, Malang, 2019.
Ratna Nurul Afifah, Praperadilan dan Ruang Lingkupnya, Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta, 1986.
Singadji, W. N., Hehanussa, D. J. A., & Supusepa, R. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Judi Online Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(8), 815-823.
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Penerbitan Surat Perintah Penyidikan Ganda |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Vivi Angely Ririhena; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | John Dirk Pasalbessy; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Jacob Hattu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Double Sprindik; Investigator; Investigation; Criminal Case |
4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: An Investigative Order or Sprindik is one of the legal processes related to administration in giving authority to investigators to be able to carry out investigations.Purposes of the Research: To analyze and discuss whether it is justified in terms of criminal procedural law procedures, issuance of investigative orders (sprindiks) on the same legal subject with different objects and to explain what legal consequences occur when two sprindiks are issued from the same subject, in the case of BNI Ambon branch main office in 2019. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research. In this study, three approaches to the problem are used, namely the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses the literature study method. All data in this study were analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the rules regarding the issuance of the Sprindik are in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure law but there are no rules that specifically regulate the number of times the Sprindik is issued by investigators. In a criminal case, the issuance of the double Sprindik resulted in the abuse of power (abuse of power), conflict of interest among investigators, and the cancellation of the Sprindik through the pretrial process and the existence of the Double Sprindik resulted in the absence of legal certainty regarding which Sprindik was used. This is because there are no regulations that explicitly regulate the number of times the Sprindik is issued. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2023-03-31 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1555 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v3i1.1555 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3, No 1 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 1, Maret 2023 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Vivi Angely Ririhena, John Dirk Pasalbessy, Jacob Hattu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.