Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Kepemilikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang telah dialihkan Tanpa sepengetahuan Kreditur
), Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta(2), Sarah Selfina Kuahaty(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The transfer of a fiduciary guarantee must obtain approval from the Fiduciary Giver (Debtor) and the Fiduciary Recipient (Creditor) but in reality there is often a transfer process by the Fiduciary Giver to the buyer who is the third person which is carried out without the knowledge of the Fiduciary recipient (Creditor).
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to find out and analyze the Legal Protection of Ownership Rights of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects that have been transferred without the knowledge of the creditor.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research, the type of research is descriptive analytical. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used in this research is through literature study. The analysis of legal materials is descriptive qualitative.
Results of the Research: The results showed that: 1). Legal protection for third parties who have received ownership rights over the object of fiduciary security carried out by the fiduciary giver (debtor) without the knowledge of the fiduciary guarantee recipient (creditor) has never been regulated in the Fiduciary Law. 2). As explained in Pasal 19, Pasal 21 ayat 1, 2, 3, and 4, Pasal 24 and Pasal 25 of the Fiduciary Law that payments for installments on the object of fiduciary security that have been transferred by the fiduciary guarantee provider (debtor) to a third party are made without the knowledge of the fiduciary recipient (creditor) is still part of the debtor's obligation to pay off the installments of the fiduciary guaranteeKeywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v3i2.1559
Published
2023-04-28
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI1559,
author = {Semuel Simaela and Jenny Matuankotta and Sarah Kuahaty},
title = {Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Kepemilikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang telah dialihkan Tanpa sepengetahuan Kreditur},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {3},
number = {2},
year = {2023},
keywords = {Legal Protection; Fiduciary Guarantee; Diversion},
abstract = {Introduction: The transfer of a fiduciary guarantee must obtain approval from the Fiduciary Giver (Debtor) and the Fiduciary Recipient (Creditor) but in reality there is often a transfer process by the Fiduciary Giver to the buyer who is the third person which is carried out without the knowledge of the Fiduciary recipient (Creditor).Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to find out and analyze the Legal Protection of Ownership Rights of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects that have been transferred without the knowledge of the creditor. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research, the type of research is descriptive analytical. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used in this research is through literature study. The analysis of legal materials is descriptive qualitative.Results of the Research: The results showed that: 1). Legal protection for third parties who have received ownership rights over the object of fiduciary security carried out by the fiduciary giver (debtor) without the knowledge of the fiduciary guarantee recipient (creditor) has never been regulated in the Fiduciary Law. 2). As explained in Pasal 19, Pasal 21 ayat 1, 2, 3, and 4, Pasal 24 and Pasal 25 of the Fiduciary Law that payments for installments on the object of fiduciary security that have been transferred by the fiduciary guarantee provider (debtor) to a third party are made without the knowledge of the fiduciary recipient (creditor) is still part of the debtor's obligation to pay off the installments of the fiduciary guarantee},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {140--157} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i2.1559},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1559}
}
Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum Perikatan, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1992.
C.S.T. Kansil, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 1989.
Dominikus Rato, Hukum Benda dan Harta Kekayaan Adat, cetakan ke-I, Laksbang Yustitia, Surabaya, 2016.
Budi Junaedi, Merry Tjoanda, and Teng Berlianty. 2022. “Perlindungan Hukum Pada Debitur Atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Parate Eksekusi”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 (2), 124-32. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6433.
Martha Elizabeth Sutrahitu, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty, Agustina Balik, Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Cipta terhadap Pelanggaran Melalui Aplikasi Telegram, TATOHI Jurnal Imu Hukum, Volume 1 Nomor 4, Juni 2021: h. 346 – 355.
P.N.H.Simanjuntak, Hukum Perdata Indonesia: Edisi Pertama, Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group, 2015.
Philipus M. Hadjon, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta. 2011.
Riky Rustam, Hukum Jaminan, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2017.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2000.
Syadzwina Hindun Nabila. 2022. “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 2/PUU-XIX/2021”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 no (3), 240-47. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i3.7513.
Theresia Louize Pesulima, Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty, Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Peredaran Produk Kesehatan Ilegal di Era Pandemik Covid-19 Di Kota Ambon, SASI, Volume 27 Nomor 2, April - Juni 2021 : h. 160 - 171.
Wahyu Sasongko, Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Hukum Pelindungan Konsumen (Bandar Lampung: UNILA, .2007.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Hukum Perdata Tentang Hak-Hak Atas Benda, cetakan ke-3, Pembimbing Masa, Jakarta, 1959.
: 1201 times
Download : 883 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Kepemilikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang telah dialihkan Tanpa sepengetahuan Kreditur |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Semuel Willem Simaela; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Sarah Selfina Kuahaty; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Legal Protection; Fiduciary Guarantee; Diversion |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The transfer of a fiduciary guarantee must obtain approval from the Fiduciary Giver (Debtor) and the Fiduciary Recipient (Creditor) but in reality there is often a transfer process by the Fiduciary Giver to the buyer who is the third person which is carried out without the knowledge of the Fiduciary recipient (Creditor).Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to find out and analyze the Legal Protection of Ownership Rights of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects that have been transferred without the knowledge of the creditor. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research, the type of research is descriptive analytical. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used in this research is through literature study. The analysis of legal materials is descriptive qualitative.Results of the Research: The results showed that: 1). Legal protection for third parties who have received ownership rights over the object of fiduciary security carried out by the fiduciary giver (debtor) without the knowledge of the fiduciary guarantee recipient (creditor) has never been regulated in the Fiduciary Law. 2). As explained in Pasal 19, Pasal 21 ayat 1, 2, 3, and 4, Pasal 24 and Pasal 25 of the Fiduciary Law that payments for installments on the object of fiduciary security that have been transferred by the fiduciary guarantee provider (debtor) to a third party are made without the knowledge of the fiduciary recipient (creditor) is still part of the debtor's obligation to pay off the installments of the fiduciary guarantee |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2023-04-28 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1559 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v3i2.1559 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3, No 2 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 2, April 2023 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Semuel Willem Simaela, Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
