Proses Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Genose Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i2.1561Keywords:
Criminal Act, Letter Forgery, GeNose C19Abstract
Introduction: Forgery of letters is caused by unauthorized changes ( without valid permission ) to letter or documents.Threats to trevelers if they are found to have falsified a covid-19 free certificate with the aim of traveling in the midst of the covid-19 outbreak.
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of the current study is to analyze and discuse how the process of forgery of letters during the covid-19 pandemic can be classified as a criminal act of forgery of letter, as regulated in article 263 of the criminal code.
Methods of the Research: The research method in this study is a noemative research, using a law approach and a conceptual approach. research data sources include primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources. Data collection techniques in the from of literature study. Processing and analysis of legal material used in writing is using qualitative analysis methods.
Results of the Research: The result of the research show that the criminal act of forging letters as referred to in article 236 of the criminal code, which was found on Thursday 27 May 2021, around 18:30 WIT at one of the Travel Agents PT. Laperissa Chaur on Ay Patty street, Ambon City. There were individuals who faked the GoNose covid-19 letter, the letter was made and assisted by suspect Rusrman, Husni Suatrean alias Nyong, Mahmudin alias Udin, and Rizky Nuralini Rizdianto alias Iki.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, “Pelaksanaan Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Terorisme,” JURNAL BELO 4, no.2 (2019): 145-57, https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol6issue2page208-220
Laden Marpaung, Asaa-Teori-praktik Hukum pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2005.
Lintang Desi Ariyanti Putri. "Efektivitas Penerapan Sanksi Pelanggaran Protokol Kesehatan Covid-19 (Corona Virus Disease-19) Di Indonesia." MAGISTRA Law Review 2.01 (2021): 13-20.
Muammar, and Wahdaniah Baharuddin. 2022. “Prinsip Miranda Rule Sebagai Hak Asasi Tersangka Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 no (3), 201-11. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i3.7504.
Susanto, Eko Adi, and Gunarto Gunarto. "Pertanggungjawaban PidanaYang Memakai Surat Palsu DitinjauDari Pasal 263 Ayat (2)KUHP."Jurnal Daulat Hukum1, no. 1 .2018.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (suatu tinjauan singkat), Cet IV, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1995.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gabriel Makatita, Reimon Supusepa, Judy Marria Saimima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
