Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh

Kristin Atihuta(1email), Merry Tjoanda(2), Pieter Radjawane(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Civil lawsuits can meet the formal and material requirements that will be submitted to the court so that no formal or material defects are found in the lawsuit.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to find and analyze how the legal consequences of a formal or material defect in a lawsuit and judges consideration about wrong object lawsuit in the land rights disputes in a court

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative judicial with a statutory approach and conceptual approach and Sources of research legal materials include primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources. Data collection techniques in the form of literature study. Processing and analysis of legal materials used in writing is using qualitative analysis method.

Results of the Research: The result of this research is that there is a formal defect in the Plaintiff's lawsuit based on the facts in the case examination in court. The Plaintiff cannot prove the argument of his lawsuit because there are differences in the object of the land dispute being sued in this case. Therefore, in filing a good and correct land dispute claim, it must meet the formal and material requirements that have become the basis of a civil lawsuit. with the consideration that the case is unacceptable.

Keywords


Lawsuit; Land Rights Dispute; Judges Consideration


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793

Published


2023-10-08

How To Cite


APA: Atihuta, K., Tjoanda, M., & Radjawane, P. (2023). Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(4), 329–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793.
IEEE: K. Atihuta, M. Tjoanda, and P. Radjawane, "Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 329–338, Oct. 2023. Accessed on: Apr. 26, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793
Harvard: Atihuta, K., Tjoanda, M., and Radjawane, P., (2023). "Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3(4), pp. 329–338. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793 (Accessed on: 26 April 2025)
Chicago: Atihuta, Kristin, Merry Tjoanda, and Pieter Radjawane. "Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 4 (June 6, 2023): 329–338. Accessed April 26, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793
Vancouver: Atihuta K, Tjoanda M, Radjawane P. Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2023 Oct 8 [cited 2025 Apr 26];3(4):329–338. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793
MLA 8th: Atihuta, Kristin, Merry Tjoanda, and Pieter Radjawane. "Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 3, no. 4, 6 Jun. 2023, pp. 329–338, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793. Accessed 26 Apr. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI1793,
		author = {Kristin Atihuta and Merry Tjoanda and Pieter Radjawane},
		title = {Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {3},
		number = {4},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Lawsuit; Land Rights Dispute; Judges Consideration},
		abstract = {Introduction: Civil lawsuits can meet the formal and material requirements that will be submitted to the court so that no formal or material defects are found in the lawsuit. Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to find and analyze how the legal consequences of a formal or material defect in a lawsuit and judges consideration about wrong object lawsuit in the land rights disputes in a court Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative judicial with a statutory approach and conceptual approach and Sources of research legal materials include primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources. Data collection techniques in the form of literature study. Processing and analysis of legal materials used in writing is using qualitative analysis method.Results of the Research: The result of this research is that there is a formal defect in the Plaintiff's lawsuit based on the facts in the case examination in court. The Plaintiff cannot prove the argument of his lawsuit because there are differences in the object of the land dispute being sued in this case. Therefore, in filing a good and correct land dispute claim, it must meet the formal and material requirements that have become the basis of a civil lawsuit. with the consideration that the case is unacceptable.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {329--338}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1793}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Triwulan Tutik, Hukum Perdata Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, Kharisma putra utama, Jakarta, 2008.

Adonia Ivonne Laturette, Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah, Jurnal Sasi Vol.22 No.2 Bulan Juli - Desember 2016.

Syahrani, Riduan, Materi Dasar Hukum Acara Perdata: Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004.

M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata (Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, danPutusanPengadilan), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Rusmadi Murad, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Atas Tanah” Bandung: Alumni, 1999.

Ronald Saija, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Penerbit Deepublish, Yogyakarta, 2017.

Barzah Latupono, Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta, Penerbit: Widina, 2021.

M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata: tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 588 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 459 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Analisa Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Gugatan Salah Objek Dalam Perkara Perdata No 19/Pdt.G/2020/PN Msh
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Kristin Atihuta; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Merry Tjoanda; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Pieter Radjawane; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Lawsuit; Land Rights Dispute; Judges Consideration
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: Civil lawsuits can meet the formal and material requirements that will be submitted to the court so that no formal or material defects are found in the lawsuit. Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to find and analyze how the legal consequences of a formal or material defect in a lawsuit and judges consideration about wrong object lawsuit in the land rights disputes in a court Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative judicial with a statutory approach and conceptual approach and Sources of research legal materials include primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources. Data collection techniques in the form of literature study. Processing and analysis of legal materials used in writing is using qualitative analysis method.Results of the Research: The result of this research is that there is a formal defect in the Plaintiff's lawsuit based on the facts in the case examination in court. The Plaintiff cannot prove the argument of his lawsuit because there are differences in the object of the land dispute being sued in this case. Therefore, in filing a good and correct land dispute claim, it must meet the formal and material requirements that have become the basis of a civil lawsuit. with the consideration that the case is unacceptable.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2023-10-08
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1793
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1793
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3, No 4 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 4, Juni 2023
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kristin Atihuta, Merry Tjoanda, Pieter Radjawane

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.