Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

Abstract
Introduction: Writing with the title: "The Validity of the Process of Proving Criminal Cases in Online Trials", has a problem formulation whether the process of proving criminal cases carried out online is accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code and how to prove criminal cases ideally.
Purposes of the Research: This writing is intended to analyze and explain the process of proving criminal cases in online courts and ideally proving criminal cases.
Methods of the Research: This writing uses a normative juridical research method, the legal materials used are secondary legal materials obtained through library research on primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials are discussed with a statutory approach, a concept approach and a case approach.
Results of the Research: That in principle the process of proving criminal cases conducted online can be accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code as an effort to fill the legal vacuum in the case of "certain circumstances" which are determined as emergencies or other circumstances. Whereas a criminal case evidence is said to be ideal, both in direct/normal trial and electronic/online trial, if it has fulfilled the evidentiary parameters, namely: implementation of proof principles/theory; evidence; submission of evidence; burden of proof; power of proof; and minimal evidence.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801
Published
2023-10-08
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI1801, author = {Tirza Latupeirissa and Deassy Hehanussa and Julianus Latupeirissa}, title = {Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online}, journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, year = {2023}, keywords = {Validity; Proof; Online Trial}, abstract = {Introduction: Writing with the title: "The Validity of the Process of Proving Criminal Cases in Online Trials", has a problem formulation whether the process of proving criminal cases carried out online is accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code and how to prove criminal cases ideally.Purposes of the Research: This writing is intended to analyze and explain the process of proving criminal cases in online courts and ideally proving criminal cases.Methods of the Research: This writing uses a normative juridical research method, the legal materials used are secondary legal materials obtained through library research on primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials are discussed with a statutory approach, a concept approach and a case approach.Results of the Research: That in principle the process of proving criminal cases conducted online can be accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code as an effort to fill the legal vacuum in the case of "certain circumstances" which are determined as emergencies or other circumstances. Whereas a criminal case evidence is said to be ideal, both in direct/normal trial and electronic/online trial, if it has fulfilled the evidentiary parameters, namely: implementation of proof principles/theory; evidence; submission of evidence; burden of proof; power of proof; and minimal evidence.}, issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {421--438} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1801} }
Jurnal
Samima J. M. dan Matrutty R. G. I., Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Daring Pada Pandemi Covid-19 Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Pengadilan Terbuka Untuk Umum, Belo 7, no. 1 (2021): 16, https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol7issue1page96-112.
Buku
Adhami Chazawi, (2008), Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Alumni, Bandung
Hiariej E. O. S., (2012), Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Yogyakarta, PT. Gelora Aksara Pratama.
Harahap M.Y., (2010), Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali), Edisi Kedua, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita, (2003), Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana, Bandung, Mandar Maju.
Lilik Mulyadi, (2007), Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bandung, Alumni.
Soesilo R., Pembelajaran Lengkap Hukum Pidana, Politera, Bandung, 1981
Soesilo R., (1996), Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Serta Komentar-Komentar- nya, Bogor, CV Politeia.
Rusli Muhammad, (2007), Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.
Online/World Wide Web
Heylaw.edu, (2022), Bedah Materi PKPA: Bentuk-Bentuk Acara Pemeriksaan Persidangan Dalam Perkara Pidana, https://heylawedu.id/blog/bedah-materi-pkpa–bentuk–bentuk–acara-pemeriksa- an-persidangan-dalam-perkara-pidana, diakses 9 Mei 2022.
Ombudsman Republik Indonesia (ORI), (2020) Kajian Cepat/Rapid Assesment Potensi Maladministrasi Pada Penyelenggaraan Persidangan Online di Tengah Pandemi, diakses 10 Januari 2022.
Pasalbessy J. D., Webinar Nasional Series II Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Hatta, Legalitas Persidangan Online pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, 13 Juli 2020, https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=FTlWhtRT--o&t=4394s. diakses 18 Desember 2021.
Romdhoni H., (2020), INANEWS.co.id, Gerai Hukum; Mengenal Tiga Tahapan Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana, http://www.inanews.co.id/2020/02/gerai-hukum–mengenal–tiga–tahapan-peme- riksaan-perkara-pidana, diakses 9 Mei 2022.
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Tirza Gloria Latupeirissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Validity; Proof; Online Trial |
4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Writing with the title: "The Validity of the Process of Proving Criminal Cases in Online Trials", has a problem formulation whether the process of proving criminal cases carried out online is accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code and how to prove criminal cases ideally.Purposes of the Research: This writing is intended to analyze and explain the process of proving criminal cases in online courts and ideally proving criminal cases.Methods of the Research: This writing uses a normative juridical research method, the legal materials used are secondary legal materials obtained through library research on primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials are discussed with a statutory approach, a concept approach and a case approach.Results of the Research: That in principle the process of proving criminal cases conducted online can be accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code as an effort to fill the legal vacuum in the case of "certain circumstances" which are determined as emergencies or other circumstances. Whereas a criminal case evidence is said to be ideal, both in direct/normal trial and electronic/online trial, if it has fulfilled the evidentiary parameters, namely: implementation of proof principles/theory; evidence; submission of evidence; burden of proof; power of proof; and minimal evidence. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2023-10-08 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1801 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3, No 4 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 4, Juni 2023 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Tirza Gloria Latupeirissa, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.