Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online

Tirza Gloria Latupeirissa; Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa; Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801

Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online

Tirza Gloria Latupeirissa⁽¹⁾, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa⁽²⁾, Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Writing with the title: "The Validity of the Process of Proving Criminal Cases in Online Trials", has a problem formulation whether the process of proving criminal cases carried out online is accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code and how to prove criminal cases ideally.

Purposes of the Research: This writing is intended to analyze and explain the process of proving criminal cases in online courts and ideally proving criminal cases.

Methods of the Research: This writing uses a normative juridical research method, the legal materials used are secondary legal materials obtained through library research on primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials are discussed with a statutory approach, a concept approach and a case approach.

Results of the Research: That in principle the process of proving criminal cases conducted online can be accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code as an effort to fill the legal vacuum in the case of "certain circumstances" which are determined as emergencies or other circumstances. Whereas a criminal case evidence is said to be ideal, both in direct/normal trial and electronic/online trial, if it has fulfilled the evidentiary parameters, namely: implementation of proof principles/theory; evidence; submission of evidence; burden of proof; power of proof; and minimal evidence.

Keywords

Validity; Proof; Online Trial

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801

Published

2023-10-08

How To Cite

APA: Latupeirissa, T.G., Hehanussa, D.J., & Latupeirissa, J.E. (2023). Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(4), 421–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801.

IEEE: T.G. Latupeirissa, D.J. Hehanussa, and J.E. Latupeirissa, "Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 421–438, Oct. 2023. Accessed on: May. 3, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801

Harvard: Latupeirissa, T.G., Hehanussa, D.J., and Latupeirissa, J.E., (2023). "Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3(4), pp. 421–438. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801 (Accessed on: 3 May 2024)

Chicago: Latupeirissa, Tirza Gloria, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. "Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 4 (June 6, 2023): 421–438. Accessed May 3, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801

Vancouver: Latupeirissa TG, Hehanussa DJ, Latupeirissa JE. Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2023 Oct 8 [cited 2024 May 3];3(4):421–438. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801

MLA 8th: Latupeirissa, Tirza Gloria, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. "Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 3, no. 4, 6 Jun. 2023, pp. 421–438, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801. Accessed 3 May. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1801,
		author = {Tirza Latupeirissa and Deassy Hehanussa and Julianus Latupeirissa},
		title = {Keabsahan Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Persidangan Yang Bersifat Online},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {3},
		number = {4},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Validity; Proof; Online Trial},
		abstract = {Introduction: Writing with the title: "The Validity of the Process of Proving Criminal Cases in Online Trials", has a problem formulation whether the process of proving criminal cases carried out online is accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code and how to prove criminal cases ideally.Purposes of the Research:  This writing is intended to analyze and explain the process of proving criminal cases in online courts and ideally proving criminal cases.Methods of the Research: This writing uses a normative juridical research method, the legal materials used are secondary legal materials obtained through library research on primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials are discussed with a statutory approach, a concept approach and a case approach.Results of the Research: That in principle the process of proving criminal cases conducted online can be accepted according to the Criminal Procedure Code as an effort to fill the legal vacuum in the case of "certain circumstances" which are determined as emergencies or other circumstances. Whereas a criminal case evidence is said to be ideal, both in direct/normal trial and electronic/online trial, if it has fulfilled the evidentiary parameters, namely: implementation of proof principles/theory; evidence; submission of evidence; burden of proof; power of proof; and minimal evidence.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {421--438}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i4.1801},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1801}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Jurnal

Samima J. M. dan Matrutty R. G. I., Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Daring Pada Pandemi Covid-19 Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Pengadilan Terbuka Untuk Umum, Belo 7, no. 1 (2021): 16, https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol7issue1page96-112.

Buku

Adhami Chazawi, (2008), Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Alumni, Bandung

Hiariej E. O. S., (2012), Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Yogyakarta, PT. Gelora Aksara Pratama.

Harahap M.Y., (2010), Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali), Edisi Kedua, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.

Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita, (2003), Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana, Bandung, Mandar Maju.

Lilik Mulyadi, (2007), Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bandung, Alumni.

Soesilo R., Pembelajaran Lengkap Hukum Pidana, Politera, Bandung, 1981

Soesilo R., (1996), Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Serta Komentar-Komentar- nya, Bogor, CV Politeia.

Rusli Muhammad, (2007), Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.

Online/World Wide Web

Heylaw.edu, (2022), Bedah Materi PKPA: Bentuk-Bentuk Acara Pemeriksaan Persidangan Dalam Perkara Pidana, https://heylawedu.id/blog/bedah-materi-pkpa–bentuk–bentuk–acara-pemeriksa- an-persidangan-dalam-perkara-pidana, diakses 9 Mei 2022.

Ombudsman Republik Indonesia (ORI), (2020) Kajian Cepat/Rapid Assesment Potensi Maladministrasi Pada Penyelenggaraan Persidangan Online di Tengah Pandemi, diakses 10 Januari 2022.

Pasalbessy J. D., Webinar Nasional Series II Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Hatta, Legalitas Persidangan Online pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, 13 Juli 2020, https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=FTlWhtRT--o&t=4394s. diakses 18 Desember 2021.

Romdhoni H., (2020), INANEWS.co.id, Gerai Hukum; Mengenal Tiga Tahapan Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana, http://www.inanews.co.id/2020/02/gerai-hukum–mengenal–tiga–tahapan-peme- riksaan-perkara-pidana, diakses 9 Mei 2022.

Full Text: PDF