Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin

Nandito Joi Sangadji; Hadibah Zachra Wadjo; Carolina Tuhumury

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808

Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin

Nandito Joi Sangadji⁽¹⁾, Hadibah Zachra Wadjo⁽²⁾, Carolina Tuhumury⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Criminal liability arises when the damage caused by the negligence of the hospital's medical staff meets three factors: The three factors are the presence or absence of negligence, wrongdoing, and other relevant sanctions. In addition, under the criminal justice system, if a company commits a crime, its owner can be jailed or fined.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the refusal of patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated against the Health Law Number 36 of 2009 and to analyze and explain the legal policy mechanism taken for patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated who are referred to the hospital.

Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative, which is focused on providing explanations that explain a particular category. Approach the problem of the statute approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The collection of legal materials through primary legal materials is then free from secondary legal materials. The processing and analysis of legal materials is described in a qualitative way with the aim of describing the findings in the field.

Results of the Research: The refusal of patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated is contrary to the Health Law No. 36 of 2009. In which the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health has regulated the refusal of health services by hospitals. The legal policy mechanism that is taken for emergency patients because they have not been vaccinated is that they still pay attention to the existing legal rules for both patients and for the hospital, by prioritizing patient safety first, all patients are entitled to outpatient medical services, inpatient care, or emergency department at a health facility. This is regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 29 of 2004 concerning medical practice, Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 36 of 2009 concerning health. The refusal to take care of the patient's health is ignored by medical institutions, because it can worsen the patient's condition.

Keywords

Patient Refusal; Not Vaccinated Yet; Emergency State

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808

Published

2023-10-10

How To Cite

APA: Sangadji, N.J., Wadjo, H.Z., & Tuhumury, C. (2023). Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(5), 482–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808.

IEEE: N.J. Sangadji, H.Z. Wadjo, and C. Tuhumury, "Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 482–495, Oct. 2023. Accessed on: Apr. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808

Harvard: Sangadji, N.J., Wadjo, H.Z., and Tuhumury, C., (2023). "Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3(5), pp. 482–495. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808 (Accessed on: 30 April 2025)

Chicago: Sangadji, Nandito Joi, Hadibah Zachra Wadjo, and Carolina Tuhumury. "Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 5 (October 10, 2023): 482–495. Accessed April 30, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808

Vancouver: Sangadji NJ, Wadjo HZ, Tuhumury C. Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2023 Oct 10 [cited 2025 Apr 30];3(5):482–495. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808

MLA 8th: Sangadji, Nandito Joi, Hadibah Zachra Wadjo, and Carolina Tuhumury. "Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 3, no. 5, 10 Oct. 2023, pp. 482–495, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808. Accessed 30 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1808,
		author = {Nandito Sangadji and Hadibah Wadjo and Carolina Tuhumury},
		title = {Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {3},
		number = {5},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Patient Refusal; Not Vaccinated Yet; Emergency State},
		abstract = {Introduction: Criminal liability arises when the damage caused by the negligence of the hospital's medical staff meets three factors: The three factors are the presence or absence of negligence, wrongdoing, and other relevant sanctions. In addition, under the criminal justice system, if a company commits a crime, its owner can be jailed or fined.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the refusal of patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated against the Health Law Number 36 of 2009 and to analyze and explain the legal policy mechanism taken for patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated who are referred to the hospital.Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative, which is focused on providing explanations that explain a particular category. Approach the problem of the statute approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The collection of legal materials through primary legal materials is then free from secondary legal materials. The processing and analysis of legal materials is described in a qualitative way with the aim of describing the findings in the field.Results of the Research: The refusal of patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated is contrary to the Health Law No. 36 of 2009. In which the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health has regulated the refusal of health services by hospitals. The legal policy mechanism that is taken for emergency patients because they have not been vaccinated is that they still pay attention to the existing legal rules for both patients and for the hospital, by prioritizing patient safety first, all patients are entitled to outpatient medical services, inpatient care, or emergency department at a health facility. This is regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 29 of 2004 concerning medical practice, Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 36 of 2009 concerning health. The refusal to take care of the patient's health is ignored by medical institutions, because it can worsen the patient's condition.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {482--495}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1808}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Abdul Bari Syaifudin, (2002), Buku Acuan Nasional Pelayanan Kesehatan Maternal dan Neonatal, Yayasan Bina Pustaka, Jakarta

Anna Maria Salamor, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat, dalam Baccarita Law Journal, Volume 2 Nomor 1, 2021

Ayunda R, Kosasih V, Disemadi HS. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Terhadap Efek Samping Pasca Pelaksanaan Vaksinasi Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Nusantara, Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 2021

Baharudin Lopa, (1987), Permasalahan Pembinaan dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Bulan Bintang, Jakarta

Indroharto, (2002), Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta

JimlyAsshiddiqie, (2011), Konstitusi dan KonstitusionalismeIndonesia, SinarGrafika, Jakarta

Marulak Pardede, Aspek Hukum Kekarantinaan Kesehatan Dan Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Penanggulangan Pandemi Covid-19, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Volume, 2021

Muh. Ali Masnun, dkk., Perlindungan Hukum Atas Vaksin Covid-19 dan Tanggung Jawab Negara Pemenuhan Vaksin Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Kesejahteraan. Junal Ilmu hukum, Volume 17 Nomor 1, 2021

Munir Fuady, (2005), Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pendekatan Kontemporer, Citra Aditya Bakti, Jakarta

Samsi Jacobalis, (1989), Menjaga Mutu Pelayanan Rumah sakit, Windu Satria, Jakarta

Satjipto Raharjo, (1980), Hukum dan Masyarakat, Cetakan Terakhir, Angkasa, Bandung

Setiyo Adi Nugroho & Indra Nur Hidayat, Efektifitas dan keamanan Vaksin covid 19, Jurnal Keperawatan Provesionalisme, vol. 9 no. 2, 2021

Sylvia Hasanah Thorik, Efektivitas Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar Di Indonesia Dalam Penanggulangan Pandemi Covid-19, Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, Volume 4, 2020

Wibowo Hadiwardoyo, Kerugian Ekonomi Nasional Akibat Pandemi Covid-19, Baskara: Journal of Business & Entrepreneurship, Volume 2, 2020

Zuleha, (2017), Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Deepublish, Yogyakarta.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 529 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 272 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Penolakan Pasien Dalam Keadaan Darurat Karena Belum Divaksin

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Nandito Joi Sangadji; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Hadibah Zachra Wadjo; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Carolina Tuhumury; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Patient Refusal; Not Vaccinated Yet; Emergency State

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: Criminal liability arises when the damage caused by the negligence of the hospital's medical staff meets three factors: The three factors are the presence or absence of negligence, wrongdoing, and other relevant sanctions. In addition, under the criminal justice system, if a company commits a crime, its owner can be jailed or fined.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the refusal of patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated against the Health Law Number 36 of 2009 and to analyze and explain the legal policy mechanism taken for patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated who are referred to the hospital.Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative, which is focused on providing explanations that explain a particular category. Approach the problem of the statute approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The collection of legal materials through primary legal materials is then free from secondary legal materials. The processing and analysis of legal materials is described in a qualitative way with the aim of describing the findings in the field.Results of the Research: The refusal of patients in an emergency situation because they have not been vaccinated is contrary to the Health Law No. 36 of 2009. In which the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health has regulated the refusal of health services by hospitals. The legal policy mechanism that is taken for emergency patients because they have not been vaccinated is that they still pay attention to the existing legal rules for both patients and for the hospital, by prioritizing patient safety first, all patients are entitled to outpatient medical services, inpatient care, or emergency department at a health facility. This is regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 29 of 2004 concerning medical practice, Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 36 of 2009 concerning health. The refusal to take care of the patient's health is ignored by medical institutions, because it can worsen the patient's condition.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2023-10-10

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1808

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1808

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3, No 5 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 5, Juli 2023

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..