Problematika Buruh Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020

Siti Zumrah Koly(1email), Saartje Sarah Alfons(2), Merlien Irene Matitaputty(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Changes to the provisions regarding outsourcing in the Job Creation Law have substantively eliminated legal protection for outsourced workers and workers in general and perpetuated the contract system by expanding the scope of work of outsourced workers.

Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to find out the problems experienced by outsourcing workers after the decision of the consitutional court number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Methods of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a normative juridical research type, namely the process to find the rule of law, legal principles and legal doctrine to answer the legal issues faced. By using the research approach statue approach (approach of Act), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), philosophical approach and sociological approach as a supporting approach.

Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it was  found that after decision of the constitutional court number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 brought several problems for workers, especially outsourcing workers as contained in law number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation and also had not accommodated the perpective of Indonesian legal products regarding that fulfillment of labor rights in law number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation, including : (1) continuing to perpetuate the outsourcing system which was massively rejected when it was encated in law number 13 of 2003 concerning manpower, (2) the loss of restrictions on the types of work that can be outsourced in order to benefit the company to reduce production costs in terms of wages because the outsourcing system in determining wages has three components that are distibuted, namely outsourcing companis, outsourcing workers, and service user companies, (3) threatened with unilateral layoffs because in the changes to the provisions for layoffs in law No or 11 of 2020 concerning job creation states that layoffs are sufficient to be carried out throught notification from.


Keywords


Problematic; Outsourcing; Constitutional Court


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1812

Published


2023-10-10

How To Cite


APA: Koly, S.Z., Alfons, S.S., & Matitaputty, M.I. (2023). Problematika Buruh Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(5), 521–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1812.
IEEE: S.Z. Koly, S.S. Alfons, and M.I. Matitaputty, "Problematika Buruh Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 521–532, Oct. 2023. Accessed on: Dec. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1812
Harvard: Koly, S.Z., Alfons, S.S., and Matitaputty, M.I., (2023). "Problematika Buruh Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3(5), pp. 521–532. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1812 (Accessed on: 22 December 2024)
Chicago: Koly, Siti Zumrah, Saartje Sarah Alfons, and Merlien Irene Matitaputty. "Problematika Buruh Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 5 (October 10, 2023): 521–532. Accessed December 22, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1812
Vancouver: Koly SZ, Alfons SS, Matitaputty MI. Problematika Buruh Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2023 Oct 10 [cited 2024 Dec 22];3(5):521–532. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1812
MLA 8th: Koly, Siti Zumrah, Saartje Sarah Alfons, and Merlien Irene Matitaputty. "Problematika Buruh Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 3, no. 5, 10 Oct. 2023, pp. 521–532, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1812. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI1812,
		author = {Siti Koly and Saartje Alfons and Merlien Matitaputty},
		title = {Problematika Buruh Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {3},
		number = {5},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Problematic; Outsourcing; Constitutional Court},
		abstract = {Introduction: Changes to the provisions regarding outsourcing in the Job Creation Law have substantively eliminated legal protection for outsourced workers and workers in general and perpetuated the contract system by expanding the scope of work of outsourced workers.Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to find out the problems experienced by outsourcing workers after the decision of the consitutional court number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.Methods of the Research: The research method in this paper uses a normative juridical research type, namely the process to find the rule of law, legal principles and legal doctrine to answer the legal issues faced. By using the research approach statue approach (approach of Act), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), philosophical approach and sociological approach as a supporting approach.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it was  found that after decision of the constitutional court number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 brought several problems for workers, especially outsourcing workers as contained in law number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation and also had not accommodated the perpective of Indonesian legal products regarding that fulfillment of labor rights in law number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation, including : (1) continuing to perpetuate the outsourcing system which was massively rejected when it was encated in law number 13 of 2003 concerning manpower, (2) the loss of restrictions on the types of work that can be outsourced in order to benefit the company to reduce production costs in terms of wages because the outsourcing system in determining wages has three components that are distibuted, namely outsourcing companis, outsourcing workers, and service user companies, (3) threatened with unilateral layoffs because in the changes to the provisions for layoffs in law No or 11 of 2020 concerning job creation states that layoffs are sufficient to be carried out throught notification from.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {521--532}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i5.1812},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1812}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Agusmudah. Dinamika dan Kajian Teori Hukum Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia. Bogor, (2010)

Atang Hermawan Usman, Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Dan Pemerintah Sebagai Faktor Tegaknya Negara Hukum Di Indonesia (2014) 30 Jurnal Wawasan Hukum.

Azikin Zaenal, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perburuhan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, (2004)

Latupono Barzah, Perlindungan Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Pekerja Kontrak (Outsourcing) Di Kota Ambon, Jurnal Sasi ,Vol 17 No. 3 , (2011)

Silaban Rekson, Buruh Versus Pengusaha, Jakarta, Romawi Press, (2009)

Tjandraningsih Indasari, et all., Diskriminatif dan Eksploitatif Praktek Kerja Kontrak dan outsourcing buruh di sektor Industri Metal di Indonesia Bandung: AKATIGA-FSPMI-FES, (2010)

Soekanto Soerjono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, (1986)

Laurensius Arliman S. Perkembangan dan Dinamika Hukum Ketenagkerjaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Selat.Vol.5.No.1. (2017)

Manululang H Sendjun , Pokok-Pokok Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Di Indonesia, Rineka Citra, Jakarta, (1998)

Kertas Kebijakan Catatan Kritis Terhadap UU No 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja Pengesahan DPR 5 Oktober (2020) Edisi 2/ 5 November 2020

FPBN dan Aliansi SB Jatam, Ketika Buruh Nombok Biaya Hidupnya : Biaya-biaya tersembunyi fleksibilitas akibat pemberlakuan UU 13/2003 (2005)

Setyowati Jati Peni, Fungsi Filsafat, Agama, Ideologi Dan Hukum Dalam Perkembangan Politik Di Indonesia (2016) Yuridika.

Razy Fakhrur Muhammad dan Fedryansyah Muhammad, Konflik Gerakan Masyarakat Sipil Dan Pemerintah Dalam Proses Penyusunan Rancangan Undang-Undang Omnibus Law 2020 (2020) 2 Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik

https://gajimu.com/pekerjaan-yanglayak/omnibus-law-uu-cipta-kerja/pekerja-outsourcing-atau-alih-daya

https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/tentang-uang-konpensasi-pesangon-nya-karyawan-kontrak-lt560b6b4ee463f

http://www.vhrmedia.net/home/index.php?id=print&aid=1959&cid=3&lang=

https://mapcorner.wg.ugm.ac.id/2019/08/pekerja-kita-butuh-perlindungan-bukan-fleksibilisasi/

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 418 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 254 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Siti Zumrah Koly, Saartje Sarah Alfons, Merlien Irene Matitaputty

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.