Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan

Felix Brayen Uruilal(1email), Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena(2), Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: The state sovereignty dispute between China and Taiwan Hostility also occurs between the authorities of China and Taiwan, which are the 23rd province of China but are administratively separated, which talks about the legality of international legal recognition.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine the status of Taiwan in the sovereignty of the State of China, as well as the legality of international law on the recognition of countries in the conflict between China and Taiwan.

Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research by means of research conducted by collecting primary, secondary, tertiary data obtained by using a literature study. The data that has been collected is analyzed qualitatively, the descriptions of which are arranged systematically based on discipline, legal science to achieve clarity on the issues to be discussed.

Results of the Research: The status of Taiwan in the sovereignty of the State of China is the status quo where Taiwan does not have international sovereignty, is not de facto independent, Taiwan is a country because it already has a clear population, territory, area and government. However, de jure Taiwan has not yet been recognized as a country by the international community and the United Nations. The legality of international law in the case of China and Taiwan is a collection of laws which mostly consist of principles and rules that must be obeyed by countries. for that there must be a permanent recognition to be one of the concepts that determine the criteria of a state in international law which is contained in three opposing theories, namely Constitutive Theory, Declarative Theory, and Middle Way Theory. In this theory clearly get the legality of the problems that occur between China and Taiwan.


Keywords


Legality; International Law; Recognition; Conflict


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858

Published


2023-10-24

How To Cite


APA: Uruilal, F.B., Wattimena, J.A., & Tahamata, L.C. (2023). Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(8), 739–748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858.
IEEE: F.B. Uruilal, J.A. Wattimena, and L.C. Tahamata, "Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 739–748, Oct. 2023. Accessed on: May. 9, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858
Harvard: Uruilal, F.B., Wattimena, J.A., and Tahamata, L.C., (2023). "Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3(8), pp. 739–748. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858 (Accessed on: 9 May 2025)
Chicago: Uruilal, Felix Brayen, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, and Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata. "Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 8 (October 24, 2023): 739–748. Accessed May 9, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858
Vancouver: Uruilal FB, Wattimena JA, Tahamata LC. Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2023 Oct 24 [cited 2025 May 9];3(8):739–748. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858
MLA 8th: Uruilal, Felix Brayen, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, and Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata. "Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 3, no. 8, 24 Oct. 2023, pp. 739–748, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858. Accessed 9 May. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI1858,
		author = {Felix Uruilal and Josina Wattimena and Lucia Tahamata},
		title = {Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {3},
		number = {8},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Legality; International Law; Recognition; Conflict},
		abstract = {Introduction: The state sovereignty dispute between China and Taiwan Hostility also occurs between the authorities of China and Taiwan, which are the 23rd province of China but are administratively separated, which talks about the legality of international legal recognition.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine the status of Taiwan in the sovereignty of the State of China, as well as the legality of international law on the recognition of countries in the conflict between China and Taiwan.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research by means of research conducted by collecting primary, secondary, tertiary data obtained by using a literature study. The data that has been collected is analyzed qualitatively, the descriptions of which are arranged systematically based on discipline, legal science to achieve clarity on the issues to be discussed.Results of the Research: The status of Taiwan in the sovereignty of the State of China is the status quo where Taiwan does not have international sovereignty, is not de facto independent, Taiwan is a country because it already has a clear population, territory, area and government. However, de jure Taiwan has not yet been recognized as a country by the international community and the United Nations. The legality of international law in the case of China and Taiwan is a collection of laws which mostly consist of principles and rules that must be obeyed by countries. for that there must be a permanent recognition to be one of the concepts that determine the criteria of a state in international law which is contained in three opposing theories, namely Constitutive Theory, Declarative Theory, and Middle Way Theory. In this theory clearly get the legality of the problems that occur between China and Taiwan.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {739--748}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1858}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Jurnal

Lucia Ch. O, Tahamata, Hak Hidup Anak Dalam Kandungan Di Luar Perkawinan Yang Sah Dalam Pandangan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jurnal SASI, Vol. 21, No. 2 Juli – Desember 2015.

Elias, M. A, Wattimena, J. A, & Rehatta, V. J. Perspektif Hukum Internasional Terhadap Perlindungan Ham Aktivis Kemanusian. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1 (7), 643 – 653. (2021)

Elsa Libella dkk, Pengakuan Dalam Pembentukan Negara Ditinjau Dari Segi Hukum Internasional, Journal Of Judical Reviuw, No. 22 Vol 2, Desember 2020

Mahendra Putra Kurnia, Hukum Internaisonal Kajian Ontologis, Risalah Hukum, Vol 4 No. 2, Desember 2008.

Buku

Ardiwisastra Yudha Bhakti, Hukum Internasional, Bunga Rampai, Alumni, Bandung, 2003.

Huala Adolf, Aspek-aspek Negara Dalam Hukum Internasional, Cetakan I, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 1991.

Sefriani, Hukum Internasional Suatu Pengantar, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2010.

S Tasrif, Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Putra Abaridin, Bandung, 1978.

Woodhouse Drake Carey Suisse S.A, Republic of Somalia, United Kingdom, 1993

Web

https://www.kompas.com/stori/read/2021/09/20/150000779/mengapa-china-tidak-menyerang-taiwan-?page=all, Diakses pada tanggal 22 Oktober 2022

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 825 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 2526 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Legalitas Hukum Internasional Tentang Pengakuan Negara–Negara Terhadap Konflik China Dan Taiwan
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Felix Brayen Uruilal; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Legality; International Law; Recognition; Conflict
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: The state sovereignty dispute between China and Taiwan Hostility also occurs between the authorities of China and Taiwan, which are the 23rd province of China but are administratively separated, which talks about the legality of international legal recognition.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine the status of Taiwan in the sovereignty of the State of China, as well as the legality of international law on the recognition of countries in the conflict between China and Taiwan.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research by means of research conducted by collecting primary, secondary, tertiary data obtained by using a literature study. The data that has been collected is analyzed qualitatively, the descriptions of which are arranged systematically based on discipline, legal science to achieve clarity on the issues to be discussed.Results of the Research: The status of Taiwan in the sovereignty of the State of China is the status quo where Taiwan does not have international sovereignty, is not de facto independent, Taiwan is a country because it already has a clear population, territory, area and government. However, de jure Taiwan has not yet been recognized as a country by the international community and the United Nations. The legality of international law in the case of China and Taiwan is a collection of laws which mostly consist of principles and rules that must be obeyed by countries. for that there must be a permanent recognition to be one of the concepts that determine the criteria of a state in international law which is contained in three opposing theories, namely Constitutive Theory, Declarative Theory, and Middle Way Theory. In this theory clearly get the legality of the problems that occur between China and Taiwan.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2023-10-24
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1858
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v3i8.1858
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3, No 8 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 8, Oktober 2023
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Felix Brayen Uruilal, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.